It potentially forces structural changes because it undermines the quality of life and sense of order, and agitates the values and/or daily life of the people and institutions that are in power. There is no guarantee of success, but given the Black communities demographics, lack of general wealth, and political impotence there isn't a lot of leverage. Further, if decreasing White tranquility is the most effective way to create structural change then so be it. And so, while it is not an ideal situation we've been pushed to this point because of the lack of effective large scale solutions.
I'm curious since you've mentioned Black business in several threads now, do you think that substantial change on a large scale can occur without Black businesses being undermined on some level?
What structural changes resulted from the pillaging that occurred in Ferguson, MO or Baltimore,MD?
Can you point to a precedent in America from the last quarter century?
If you can't, then I think this is a case of trying to justify, get meaning from, and hoping that something positive results from the looting and rioting(after they started popping off)
The system, WS, or whatever name someone calls it is based on ownership & control of resources and institutions. Blacks having ownership & control of our own resources and institutions (including viable businesses) decreases our dependence on those of others. Black businesses being compromised and undermined reduces the leverage Black people have in this country. It hinders chances for progress.
Look at the comments in the "Tulsa riots" threads about how,besides the savage terrorism inflicted on Black Americans impacted the community...............how the destruction of Black owned businesses hindered that community's progress (by design)
I can't ride with people dismissing or excusing the destruction of Black businesses. I can't.