whats the problem here?
whats the problem here?
It's not a problem problem. It's just that the last time they had one only about 100 of those were placed. I see it as taking advantage of their own voters ignorance on Bernie imo.whats the problem here?
It's all in the game.no he needs to win.Are you on autostrike mode? Did you see what the color coding meant?
You're wrong about DE, PA, and CT though. I definitely think he wins those. Baltimore is more northern urban, but the Blacks in the rural sports and suburbs are probably deep for Clinton. MD is in play.
Bernie is as much a New Yorker as Hillary is, and he really needs a huge push RIGHT NOW, there. He could take New York and N.J. if no fukkery is involved (knowing what Cuomo has already pulled, I KNOW there will be some), and all Bernie needs is to either win or not get blown out...
i mean they have a choice to pick bernie too right?It's not a problem problem. It's just that the last time they had one only about 100 of those were placed. I see it as taking advantage of their own voters ignorance on Bernie imo.It's all in the game.
California can make up any losses from New York, but he can't lose NY and NJ by larger than 10%.no he needs to win.
how many delegates can he win in a 60-40 win in cali?California can make up any losses from New York, but he can't lose NY and NJ by larger than 10%.
Of course. The idea of a caucus is essentially hearing your fellow voters make a case for the candidates they are voting for. I know plenty of older folks that essentially already chose Hillary without seeing a single debate, hardly knowing a single thing about Bernie, alli mean they have a choice to pick bernie too right?
about the boogie word socialism, touting "experience" and entirely eating up the media narrative.285 of 475 if exactly proportional. So I'd say 275-290 to account for noise in either direction.how many delegates can he win in a 60-40 win in cali?
285 of 475 if exactly proportional. So I'd say 275-290 to account for noise in either direction.
Hillary only picks up 136 out of 247 in New York with a 55% win, and 70 out of 126 in New Jersey. He can afford to lose those if he's conquering everywhere else.
little confused, so ur saying he can win 275 or 290 in cali with a 60-40 win?285 of 475 if exactly proportional. So I'd say 275-290 to account for noise in either direction.
Hillary only picks up 136 out of 247 in New York with a 55% win, and 70 out of 126 in New Jersey. He can afford to lose those if he's conquering everywhere else.
last time i checked she was up +48.Seems overly ambitious to think Hillary would only get 55% in NY, fam.
last time i checked she was up +48.
Nah b... NAHHH It ain'tSeems overly ambitious to think Hillary would only get 55% in NY, fam.

But there's Asians.![]()
They're both from there. I really don't think she has a built in home field advantage. The people of Queens think more like theSeems overly ambitious to think Hillary would only get 55% in NY, fam.
versions of Bernie, although they are more cynical. However, they've eaten A LOT of shyt from the Democratic establishment fukking up the state with neoliberalism. They could let their frustration be known.