Oh.
My.
God.
Dude. Sanders is a new candidate, who isn't covered by local newspapers, is dismissed by national media, and is completely funded by his small donor base. Since day 1, Sanders has been playing catch up in the polls. Sanders SHOULD NOT be doing better percentage wise because Sanders does not get coverage/hasn't been on the election trails as long as Clinton.
He needed to tie her in Iowa in order to show the nation he was the real deal. The Clinton campaign pivoted and said that Iowa doesn't determine the president.
He needed to win in New Hampshire. The Clinton campaign pivoted and said that New Hampshire is close to vermont and there are nothing but white folks voting.
He didn't start campaigning heavy in Nevada and South Carolina until he was able to get the funds and the momentum from Iowa and New Hampshire.
Where and how should Sanders be doing better percentage wise? Go do the googles ya self. Narrow the search from January 2015 to December 2015, enter a specific state + democratic + poll and find me the results that have Sanders on top. He came into the game an under dog. He wasn't the number one choice of progressives. The Democratic establishment doesn't support him. The unions have been forcing their members to attend Clinton rallies. He's not getting any major sponsorships.
This tactic of minimizing his accomplishments to date reeks of Clinton back peddling. Every win isn't big enough, and every loss is the back breaking critical hit.
I'm tired of having to defend this old ass nikka like he's my favorite person in the world.