Marco Rubio trying to create law that dudes must pay child support starting at month of conception

old_timer

Taxi Squad
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
2,396
Reputation
2,368
Daps
6,851
Rubio needs to be creating scoring opportunities for his teammates, not introducing a bunch of legislation :damn:
Focus on Bulgaria and belgium, not babies
Tbilisi is less than six weeks away
He's gotta provide that senior leadership
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
22,261
Reputation
11,982
Daps
128,956
There are many ways to avoid unwanted pregnancies for men. I have no problem with this. You wanted to go raw ina bytch you know the potential consequences. Great rule of thumb: If you can’t see yourself raising a baby with that person, wrap it up.
I want to know what their plan will be if men just stop having unprotected sex. Ban all forms of birth control? then what happens if men just refuse to have sex in the United States and start moving? then what? The people making these policies don't actually think through the consequences. They just want to do this instead of doing the actual work that makes having families attractive. Maternity AND paternity leave, raising the minimum wage so a man can actually feed more than one child, regulating rent controls so people can save enough money to buy houses and have bigger families, criminal justice reform so that men who could be fathers aren't getting locked away over bullshyt crimes or being killed by police. Subsidized daycare so mothers don't have a big gap in their employment history, therefore making it harder for them to return to the workforce.

They don't care about families. They want to do the least amount of work while grabbing as much of our tax money as they can.

I'd be curious to see what would happen if a movement of ACTUALLY pro family republicans showed up. They'd actually start winning elections without having to cheat when they're talking about shyt like conserving the environment, making the dollar stretch further, putting all the pieces in place so that people can have big families, cutting the wasteful government spending on police that don't do anything but harass and kill the people who they're supposed to be protecting. etc.
 

Software

RIP Future Gohan
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
13,687
Reputation
3,414
Daps
56,699
Reppin
Swole Gang
I'm actually not opposed to this as long as the State or government requires DNA testing as necessary measure....
Yeah if it is your child then yeah. A lot of important shyt happens while the women is pregnant. You'll want her to be able to buy better quality foods, things the baby will need, help pay for prenatal doctor visits etc.
People underrate how much what is done before a child is born affects the child's life
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,232
Reputation
9,495
Daps
121,424
The state is not going to be picking up the tab for the extra kids which will be produced as a result of the over turn of Roe Vs Wade.
This law may never pass but get ready for a variation of bills like this across the country.

These pro-lifers are full of shyt. If they cared about life, there would be no kids in foster care. Newly born babies are being dumped in foster care as I type.


Reminds me of this


 

Taco

All Star
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
4,170
Reputation
553
Daps
11,600
I want to know what their plan will be if men just stop having unprotected sex. Ban all forms of birth control? then what happens if men just refuse to have sex in the United States and start moving? then what? The people making these policies don't actually think through the consequences. They just want to do this instead of doing the actual work that makes having families attractive. Maternity AND paternity leave, raising the minimum wage so a man can actually feed more than one child, regulating rent controls so people can save enough money to buy houses and have bigger families, criminal justice reform so that men who could be fathers aren't getting locked away over bullshyt crimes or being killed by police. Subsidized daycare so mothers don't have a big gap in their employment history, therefore making it harder for them to return to the workforce.

They don't care about families. They want to do the least amount of work while grabbing as much of our tax money as they can.

I'd be curious to see what would happen if a movement of ACTUALLY pro family republicans showed up. They'd actually start winning elections without having to cheat when they're talking about shyt like conserving the environment, making the dollar stretch further, putting all the pieces in place so that people can have big families, cutting the wasteful government spending on police that don't do anything but harass and kill the people who they're supposed to be protecting. etc.
:mjlol:
 
Last edited:
Top