Mass Shooting forum reaction kit

[Afro]

Use this:




And this:

‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens

ISLA VISTA, CA—In the days following a violent rampage in southern California in which a lone attacker killed seven individuals, including himself, and seriously injured over a dozen others, citizens living in the only country where this kind of mass killing routinely occurs reportedly concluded...

www.theonion.com

Forever relevant.

Godspeed.

 

[Rhapscallion Démone]

 

[Afro]

A GIF for everything

 

[tuckgod]

There is absolutely no reason for a civilian or a police officer to be able to own or carry anything other than a handgun, shotgun, or normal hunting rifle.

Automatic and semi automatic weapons should be for armed military conflict only.

 

[Fiji Water]

There is absolutely no reason for a civilian or a police officer to be able to own or carry anything other than a handgun, shotgun, or normal hunting rifle.

Automatic and semi automatic weapons should be for armed military conflict only.

I hear you but what about a conflict that civilians might have with the military? That's just as plausible today as it was when they wrote the 2nd amendment and is the purpose/loophole for the public having such access.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Can't forget the Back-To-School Essentials.

 

[Wildin]

Automatic and semi automatic weapons should be for armed military conflict only.

You realize pistols are semi-automatic right?

 

[Kornball The Conqueror]

I hear you but what about a conflict that civilians might have with the military? That's just as plausible today as it was when they wrote the 2nd amendment and is the purpose/loophole for the public having such access.

1 armored vehicle would smash a whole city

 

[tuckgod]

You realize pistols are semi-automatic right?

You know what I mean Semantics Man.

 

[Wildin]

You know what I mean Semantics Man.

I'm not trying to pick apart your argument but with something like this you have to be very specific and detailed.

Are you wanting magazine capacity restrictions for citizens? Should one not be able to have more than a 10 or 15 round magazine? Does one need a 25, 33, 50, 100 round magazine or drum?

What about caliber? Should the average Joe be able to have 10mm or 45, 50 caliber?

An AR is a pistol caliber firearm, just with a stock/brace and sometimes and elongated barrel. Other than that there's no difference.

I have an ar pistol that uses the same magazine and caliber as my glock pistol, 9mm. Only difference between the 2 is a longer barrel and a stock.

Like I said I'm not trying to tear your argument apart, I'm want to hear something more concrete and precise.

It's like if a bar said "no hoodys" ok, does that mean just sweatshirts with a hood? What about zip up sweatshirts with a hood? What about jackets with a hood? What about a coat with a hood? Is the hood the issue or is there something more specific the establishment is trying to censor?

I could put my glock in this, like a glove. Should this be banned?

 

[JadeB]

I hear you but what about a conflict that civilians might have with the military? That's just as plausible today as it was when they wrote the 2nd amendment and is the purpose/loophole for the public having such access.

Why do y'all always try to make this argument? The US military has access to missiles, rockets, drones, etc. including nukes. If they wanted to wash American civilians, they could within a heartbeat. Don't use Afghanistan or Vietnam as examples because they both were in unfamiliar terrain and had the backing of China in the case of Vietnam and (allegedly) Saudi Arabia in the case of Afghanistan to provide support.

 

[CopiousX]

I hear you but what about a conflict that civilians might have with the military? That's just as plausible today as it was when they wrote the 2nd amendment and is the purpose/loophole for the public having such access.

This is insane. When the constitution was written; the avg citizen could do damn well with his musket against a military. Not anymore. Even Your semi automatic weapon isnt going to protect you from a predator drone. Just ask the remenants of ISIS, and see how well that strategy worked for them.


Hell, just ask the black residents of Tulsa or Philedelphia before bombs got dropped on their heads. Its not just air support thats an issue. You also gotta deal with all sorts of chemical arms the founding fathers couldnt even dream of. So your dreams of bunkering down in your home in case of tyrany literally turn into smoke when that tyranical govt can gass you out or bomb the whole house.


You would literally have to arm civilians with bazookas and cruz missiles for them to oppose a modern military.

 

[Son Goku]

There is absolutely no reason for a civilian or a police officer to be able to own or carry anything other than a handgun, shotgun, or normal hunting rifle.

Automatic and semi automatic weapons should be for armed military conflict only.

But semi-automatics handguns are cool?

 

[Son Goku]

I'm not trying to pick apart your argument but with something like this you have to be very specific and detailed.

Are you wanting magazine capacity restrictions for citizens? Should one not be able to have more than a 10 or 15 round magazine? Does one need a 25, 33, 50, 100 round magazine or drum?

What about caliber? Should the average Joe be able to have 10mm or 45, 50 caliber?

An AR is a pistol caliber firearm, just with a stock/brace and sometimes and elongated barrel. Other than that there's no difference.

I have an ar pistol that uses the same magazine and caliber as my glock pistol, 9mm. Only difference between the 2 is a longer barrel and a stock.

Like I said I'm not trying to tear your argument apart, I'm want to hear something more concrete and precise.

It's like if a bar said "no hoodys" ok, does that mean just sweatshirts with a hood? What about zip up sweatshirts with a hood? What about jackets with a hood? What about a coat with a hood? Is the hood the issue or is there something more specific the establishment is trying to censor?

I could put my glock in this, like a glove. Should this be banned?

Since we're playing semantics, this is technically not true if you don't define what an "AR" is. The rifles in the AK family are "ARs" and definitely don't shoot pistol caliber ammunition.

 

[tuckgod]

I'm not trying to pick apart your argument but with something like this you have to be very specific and detailed.

Are you wanting magazine capacity restrictions for citizens? Should one not be able to have more than a 10 or 15 round magazine? Does one need a 25, 33, 50, 100 round magazine or drum?

What about caliber? Should the average Joe be able to have 10mm or 45, 50 caliber?

An AR is a pistol caliber firearm, just with a stock/brace and sometimes and elongated barrel. Other than that there's no difference.

I have an ar pistol that uses the same magazine and caliber as my glock pistol, 9mm. Only difference between the 2 is a longer barrel and a stock.

Like I said I'm not trying to tear your argument apart, I'm want to hear something more concrete and precise.

It's like if a bar said "no hoodys" ok, does that mean just sweatshirts with a hood? What about zip up sweatshirts with a hood? What about jackets with a hood? What about a coat with a hood? Is the hood the issue or is there something more specific the establishment is trying to censor?

I could put my glock in this, like a glove. Should this be banned?

Revolver, shotgun, hunting rifle