Massive Explosion Pulses Through Beirut, Lebanon

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,099
Reppin
the ether
Be that as it may, it’s still the week of one of the said catastrophes.

Which means.....what?

If it happened last week, you would have said, "But this was the week the King David hotel was bombed! It's a signal!"

But if it happened next week, you would have said, "This was the week of the last atomic bombing!"

If it happened closer to the end of August, you're like, "This was the date of the First Zionist Congress!"

But if it was back earlier in July, it would be, "This is the same time Hezbollah started the Second Lebanon War, it's a message!"

May: "It's the anniversary of the foundation of the Israeli state!" or maybe "The anniversary of the attack on Ma'alot!" or maybe "The withdrawal from Lebanon!" January: "The anniversary of the end of the War of Independence!" or "the anniversary of the hostage swap with Hezbollah!" June: "The Six Day War!" or maybe "the anniversary of when Israel bombed Iraq's reactors!" or maybe "The Lebanon War!" October: "Yon Kipper War!" April: "Afula bombing!" "Death of Hitler!" February: "Hezbollah manifesto!" September: "End of Lebanon War!" November: "Founding of Hezbollah's Lebonese Resistance Brigades!"


If you decide that some random, completely unrelated event can be a "special sign", and that just being on the same week as that event is "close enough", then any fukking event will have some connection to something else that happened the same week. It makes you sound like the guy who suggested that he would blame virtually any major industrial accident in Lebanon on Mossad, just because it's "too big a coincidence" that...Mossad exists, I guess.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,075
Daps
122,397
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Oldschooler said:
It wasn't a nuclear bomb or a rocket imo. But i also think that it is very plausible that the fire was deliberately set under the guise of an accident. With all the conflict happening in the middle east and in particular between Israel, Hezbollah, and Iran you can't deny that hitting a country in economic turmoil with a dagger like this is very plausible.

:salute:

And THAT is the difference between a true skeptic and a Conspiritard.

I lean more towards this just being an accident, but I'm not going to rule-out foul-play unless more evidence comes forward.​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,075
Daps
122,397
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Mike Nasty said:
Did you really say propulsion can't work in space?

Breh, he's also stated that the difference between a sidereal day and a solar day means the Earth is flat.

:dead:

He's got me on 'Ignore' because I could prove the Sun moves 15 degrees/hr. regardless of your position on the Earth which is IMPOSSIBLE on a flying petri dish.

Him not comprehending Newton's Laws of Motion is par-for-the-course.​
 
Last edited:

Chez Lopez

Neo-Abolitionist
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Messages
1,785
Reputation
-1,036
Daps
2,478
Reppin
YAHUSHA HA MASHIACH
You're sure I didn't read the wikipedia article on underground testing? And? I have a degree in physics breh, I could have WRITTEN the article if I felt like it. :snoop:

Why don't you explain to me which part of the article you misunderstood so someone can clarify for you. :sas1::sas2:

Sure. Ill bite. Pls explain to me the particular signatures, based on the video evidence (sound, crater, sand, explosion, shock wave, etc) that would distinguish an underground or underwater nuclear bomb detonation and a thermal/chemical detonation. Please account for the differences in an air or land burst vs an underground or underwater burst. Pls also note not all nukes are the same and describe any low yield alternatives or specialized nuclear devices, such as the mini nuke (SADM). Be prepared to defend your argument.

If you provide a convincing alternative Ill consider it. Thanks!
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,124
Reputation
12,240
Daps
204,920
Are kats really saying this a nuclear explosion?

This is easy to tell because the radiation readings would go off all over the world. They can tell whenever a nuke or some large amount of radiation goes into the atmosphere.

You saw this with Chernobyl and the situation in Japan. They can tell if its a nuke or something small by the radiation levels thrown into the air.

Hell and if you want to go there in Beirut the explosion would have messed up electronics in the area and the radioactive readings would be off the charts. Cause they are at ground zero.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,075
Daps
122,397
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Sankofa Alwayz said:
shyt looks almost like 9/11...Thing look like a sunken crater :picard:

That's nothing. Check this out......​

tianjin-crater.jpg


What caused that big hole?........

 
Top