right, this is an extreme case. but for someone like DBs, who are often judged by picks and tackles, this is far bigger issue. you have a safety that picks some deflected passes and gets a pick from nothing. he couldve completely fukked up covering what he was supposed to, and still get a pick...Yeah, you're a little off with this one.
Obviously plays like this are impossible to incorporate into an advanced metric. But it's not like this happens more than once a season for a QB, so it's essentially meaningless. And they'd even out anyway when they throw a good pass that the WR tips into the air and is intercepted.
The point of advanced metric isn't to make the box score tell the WHOLE story. But by adding context like down, distance, game score, play result, etc it adds a lot more context that raw passing numbers. A 5-yard completion on 3rd-and-4 is a much more productive play than a 15-yard completion on 3rd-and-20. As I understand it, QBR does that.
a 5 yard slant taken to the house by a WR can distort stats as wellim sorry but i have a hard time believing outlier type plays like this heavily distort a quarterbacks passing stats



Just remember Matt Cassell's first yr starting compares favorably with Tom Brady's first yr in the league @YouMadd?![]()

![]()
Tom Brady's first full year as a starter(after already winning a superbowl) he put up 28TD/11INTs while Cassell put up 21TD's/11 INTs
That gap is a little farther than Matt Ryans 17TDs/11INT to Ponders 20TDs/12INTs in their respective first full seasons as starters
Now If Matt Ryan had a bunch of superbowls and was considered a top QB of all time, do you think I would be using his stats as a comparison to Ponder?![]()

nothing wrong with a DB that can catch or be around the ballright, this is an extreme case. but for someone like DBs, who are often judged by picks and tackles, this is far bigger issue. you have a safety that picks some deflected passes and gets a pick from nothing. he couldve completely fukked up covering what he was supposed to, and still get a pick...
IDA yeah the TO are cool but when you blow assignments and allow long gains because of freelancing that DB hurts the team.nothing wrong with a DB that can catch or be around the ball
we had a thread on here a few weeks ago saying Darren Sharper was underrated, primarily because he was a ball hawk.

im actually cosigning. id rather have the reliable DB who i know will cover and will make a stop, versus the 1 in 10 guy.IDA yeah the TO are cool but when you blow assignments and allow long gains because of freelancing that DB hurts the team.
OTOH unpredictable DBs do give QBs problems.![]()