I'm not gonna debate this no more. I've come to realize that the majority of the posters here who post about boxing are young dudes who are new to the sport and were prolly brought over as Floyd fans so you nikkas lack depth in your overall knowledge of the sport and it's fighters. Most of ya'll just repeat the same shyt that nikka Floyd says like a bunch of fukking parrots.
If Floyd say a nikka garbage for losing a fight, then ya'll run wit it
If Floyd say a nikka was weight drained, then ya'll run with it
If Floyd say a nikka not making money, then ya'll run with it
If Floyd say etc......, You get where I'm going with this and I'm sure other nikkas here do too.
You can't educate a nikka who is satisfied with their knowledge of something. If you feel Duran's a bum that Floyd can KO in a couple rds like Hearns did then hey.....![]()
this can't be the way a subjective argument is gone about. you can't stop giving the merits of your position and then try to pretend it's everyone else who can't formulate their own opinion when you're failing to make your case in a SUBJECTIVE argument.
my opinion. speed kills. it's simply not a good match up for Duran. in order to think Duran really has a shot, you have to make the huge leap that what he couldn't do to SRL when he decided he wasn't going to mix it up, is something he could do to PBF. and if you make that leap, what makes you believe that cause i get theface thinking about any plodding brawler catching up to PBF in any meaningful way. Duran would have his moments, but they'd be fleeting.
at the end of the day, we've seen what speed does to Duran...one of which ended in embarrassing fashion. we've seen what brawlers do to Mayweather...not a whole lot. besides that, i always thought serious fans of the sweet science knew to pick the boxer over the brawler, all things being remotely equal.
115-113
113-115
116-112
![]()
You got eyes nikka Floyd easily beat a 34 yr old 154 Oscar....fukk outta here calling it a mere split decision![]()
Yea I got eyes... watched and taped the fight..
What you're saying is simply a goddamn lie.. You're a Floyd stan of course you saw it as a one sided victory for Floyd
Mid to late 30's B hop>>>Young B Hop
Honestly I wouldn't know who wins this but B. Hop has the style to give ANY middle from ANY era problems.
Like I said he did everything ok. He fought WW and JMW moving up. He hasn't like many step up and dominate. He didn't need to dominate 5 or 6 weight classes. But at least fight in compete 2 or 3 and dominate.jus like he outboxed segundo mercado the 1st time around...
marvin didnt have to be spectacular...his 52 kos say otherwise...67 fights...3 loses 2 draws..
that means 10 em went 2 the cards...n 52 he was puttin boyz to sleep...
Random shyt I learned from reading this thread.....
Duran=Mayorga
Floyd would KO the greatest lightweight ever in a prime mythical match in the early rounds and it would be easy as fukk.
Nobody thinks Castillo gave Floyd problems in the 2ND FIGHT, which was the fight that Floyd WASN'T INJURED in.
Floyd can beat a guy with an all time great jab and who fought effectively from 147 to 175 and who had one of best right hands ever.
Duran is slow
Floyd will some how no matter what the situation is will take away his opponents jab.
SRL is very hittable
Some boxers are invincible and some boxers aren't
![]()
![]()
![]()
It amazes me how the only fight where people can point out Floyd's flaws goes back ten years in his career.
Second....no one said Floyd's invincible. No man is.
You posted a punch of "yall run with it" without quoting no one.
so a punchers chance is what you're basing your opinion on? really? the magical punch no one has ever landed on arguably one of the best defenses boxing has ever seen, is the shot you give Duran and the reason you think he could win? that's like saying "all i need is six numbers in this lotto and BANG! I'm a millionaire!".Man fukk all that... All it takes is ONE perfectly placed punch... KO... MATCH OVER
so a punchers chance is what you're basing your opinion on? really? the magical punch no one has ever landed on arguably one of the best defenses boxing has ever seen, is the shot you give Duran and the reason you think he could win? that's like saying "all i need is six numbers in this lotto and BANG! I'm a millionaire!".
how about we assume each fighter is at their best and give credence to BOTH of their greatness. in an objective look at it, you can't say speed doesn't win the day. it's done it before. why wouldn't it happen again? That's the question you guys can't seem to answer. you're basing what you want to believe on something that has never happened to Floyd. Others are basing their belief on something that HAS happened to Duran before. which seems more far fetched? which seems more homerish? i mean, c'mon...it's like saying anything bad about floyd is acceptable to you cats even when what you're saying isn't likely, just so long as it's possible. possible does not make it PROBABLE. understand the difference. duran could possibly catch Floyd with a flash KO, but it's not probable. what's more probable is that Floyd's speed and defense will frustrate Duran in the same way SRL's speed frustrated him into quitting. instead of believing what you haven't seen, itseems more logical to lean toward what you have.
It amazes me how the only fight where people can point out Floyd's flaws goes back ten years in his career.
Second....no one said Floyd's invincible. No man is.
You posted a punch of "yall run with it" without quoting no one.