give me the black guy
It's too much nonsense to just quote one person though...
I know nobody said Floyd is invincible, but ya'll damn near act like
nikkas is still kicking around that Floyd struggled against DLH shyt ?
Floyd clearly won that fight decisively but of course a Pactard has to go post judges scorecards to make a point...if I did the same shyt and brought up the judges cards for Pacs last fight all you'd here is how bullshyt the scoring was...hypocritical little fakkits.
Man I dont think I have ever seen someone with so little knowledge about boxing, comment so much on it. Most people who dont know sh!t about something just keep they mouths shut (or fingers from typing) but you just continue to spout some of the most rediculous opinions I have ever seen.
I know your trolling but damn my dude you take that sh!t to a whole other level sometimes.
Haaaaaaaawk
fukk yo thoughts lil nikka... I'm sure I've been watching boxing longer than you've been alive
nikkas is still kicking around that Floyd struggled against DLH shyt ?
Floyd clearly won that fight decisively but of course a Pactard has to go post judges scorecards to make a point...if I did the same shyt and brought up the judges cards for Pacs last fight all you'd here is how bullshyt the scoring was...hypocritical little fakkits...
Anyways I never like Floyds chances against PWill and i definitely do not like his chances against Hearns...Hearns is the only one of the four i cannt see Floyd outpointing because he won't be able to tag dude with one right and step back and reset in the pocket...
Hearns stylistically and physically would pose huge problems for Floyd...Hes too big for the dude and fought behind that jab very effectively...If there is one punch that floyd has always struggled with its the jab and Heans jab was as thorough as his dynamite right...
Ray beat Hearns cuz he essentially made him brawl with him...Floyd can't win that way...Floyd's hands are as quick as Rays were but he is nowhere near as good a combination puncher nor does he pack the power to hurt Hearns at 147...Thus I can't see Floyd capitalizing on Hearns getting brawler happy...
Damn for real? You been watching boxing for 30 years and this is what you have to show for it? I think by now you need to just give it up as a L breh. Your like the Freddy Roach of boxing posts, bunch of nonsensical ramblings by someone who thinks they know more everybody else but is fact a joke.
okay fukk the score cards
The fight was close... Floydies little punch and run tactics built up a lot of points, but the nikka couldnt put one combination together nor was he more aggressive or dominant.. Zero ring generalship not to memtion Oscar had no marks on his face. Can't say the same for Floyd
It would be one thing if Floyd was the champ, but he wasn't.. I needed to see more effort
nikkas is still kicking around that Floyd struggled against DLH shyt ?
Floyd clearly won that fight decisively but of course a Pactard has to go post judges scorecards to make a point...if I did the same shyt and brought up the judges cards for Pacs last fight all you'd here is how bullshyt the scoring was...hypocritical little fakkits...
Anyways I never like Floyds chances against PWill and i definitely do not like his chances against Hearns...Hearns is the only one of the four i cannt see Floyd outpointing because he won't be able to tag dude with one right and step back and reset in the pocket...
Hearns stylistically and physically would pose huge problems for Floyd...Hes too big for the dude and fought behind that jab very effectively...If there is one punch that floyd has always struggled with its the jab and Heans jab was as thorough as his dynamite right...
Ray beat Hearns cuz he essentially made him brawl with him...Floyd can't win that way...Floyd's hands are as quick as Rays were but he is nowhere near as good a combination puncher nor does he pack the power to hurt Hearns at 147...Thus I can't see Floyd capitalizing on Hearns getting brawler happy...
I love Mayweather and I think he will go down as a top 10, all-time fighter in any weight class, but calling Duran a slow, lumbering brawler is just disrespectful. Duran did very well against speedy boxers, aside from his hard hitting, he was a very capable defender, he knew how to not only block, but he had an effective sway technique which allowed him to minimize the damage from quick fighters or have blows just glance off of him. Honestly most of Duran's losses were due to perhaps a lack of discipline, the only fights he lost that he was flat out outclassed were against Hagler and Hearns who if I'm not mistaken were undefeated or had no more than 1 loss in their class at the time.
If you want to be technical about it, Duran was an aggressive infighter not a true brawler, like I said in earlier posts, he knew his reach was not great, so he closed the distance and forced you to play his game, he would match up against Mayweather better than you guys are giving him credit for and like I said, it's an extremely close fight and whoever wins it's by a hair.
we watched two different fights
He wasnt more agressive but he was definitely more dominant
No ring generalship
U sound like harold letterman with dat nonsense
It was his first fight ever at 154 so ofcourse he aint gonna just walk threw oscar.
He fought smart, outboxed oscar and got his win. 8 rounds to 4
Lol at punch and run tactics
Go watch gatti vs ward
Cot damn nikka hop off my dikk PLEASE.. I apologize if I said something you didnt agree with and your p*ssy started bleeding... if you can't respond or rebut or refute anything I say then just keep it moving don't start trolling.. some of y'allreally got some bytch tendancies.. shyt is disgusting... Reminds me of them bytches downtown ATL in tears crying to the police because the black Hebrew Israelites preaching the truth... nikka ignore and keep it moving or log off... SIMPLE...
![]()