My initial reaction upon reading this post was "
Who the fukk is this guy?"
But you weren't disrespectful or anything, so I'll respond to your questions.
Every thread i see on Dr Umar, it's a guarantee you in there hating.
Really? How many threads about Umar Johnson have I actually responded to? 3? Maybe 4? I generally lurk and post in HL, and I respond to a variety of topics I see posted here, particularly those that deal with various peoples' political ideologies. You'll probably see me "hating" on everyone from Ayn Rand to Cory Booker as well. I don't post in TLR that much, so if there's threads about him there, you won't see me. I don't really know what to say beyond that.
Are you one of those paid trolls on the internet
I've posted on sohh since about 2007, and the % of my posts that are about Umar Johnson is probably about 0.0000000001%, so obviously no.
It's pretty sad though, that you think this Umar Johnson character is relevant enough on the radar of any power structure to be deemed as such a threat that they would pay people to discredit him on random message boards.
He's not a threat to upend any apparatus of power because his thoughts and positions are buffoonish and not connected to reality. If I was part of some secret agenda to oppress black people, I would probably want people listening to charlatans like him instead of getting a real education that they could use to better themselves and their people.
I don't see how anyone can hate Dr Umar.
Who hates him? I take it you are a committed disciple, so you are probably a bit protective of him. But saying he's largely full of shyt doesn't mean I hate him. I just pointed out that he's one of many people in the world who spreads false information and is a charlatan preying on peoples' ignorance and suffering for his own self-interest.
Are his views on homosexuality the only reason why you hate him?
It's funny that you are so fixated on homosexuality that that would be your first rationalization on why you think I supposedly hate him.
Personally, I don't think about homosexuality very much and it's not an issue I'm particularly passionate about. Ask yourself how many times do you hear me even speak on homosexuality one way or the other if it's not in response to one of you homophobic dudes ranting about "gay agenda" this and that, blah, blah blah? I think homosexuals should be treating with the same respect and right to pursue life, liberty, and happiness as everyone else. But I only even speak on it when I'm rebutting outlandish, goofy, frightened conspiratorial, ill-informed, alarmist rhetoric about it.
He doesn't seem to say anything that is "out there" compared to these other hotep nikkaz. I'm asking you this assuming your not a paid troll. Can you refute anything he is saying?
You're probably more familiar with his work than me. You see like a big fan. My familiarity with dude is only a few youtube clips I've seen from people posting them here and on sohh. Just in those snippets, I can see right off the bat that he makes a ton of inaccurate statements. From what I've seen, he just speaks some obvious truth that one doesn't have to be particularly learned to know, mixed in with a mish-mash of goofy conspiratorial false statements, pseudoscience, pop psychology, half-truths, and outright lies.
That's what I think a lot of you guys fail to realize. When you see someone speaking critically of Umar Johnson, or Tariq Nasheed or whatever self-promoting snake oil hustler whose charisma you found yourself drawn in by, you take it as somehow an attack on black people, or black upliftment implemented by some "agent of the cac agenda," or whatever phony narrative you have in your mind.
In reality, speaking for myself, I'm just anti-bullshyt and anti-ignorance...across the board...period. My allegiance is to truth and logic first, so if someone is lying and talking nonsense, I'm going to be against it regardless of their race. Bullshyt is bullshyt.
As far as refuting his statements, I'm not as familiar with him as you, but I recall him make false, ahistorical claims, such as some crazy shyt about Alexander the Great conquering parts of Africa with an army of mulattos in order to dilute the black population, and there was some secret meeting of the Rockefellers and the Carter Administration where they decided to spread homosexuality to reduce the black population. Both of those statements are just nonsense he completely made up and has no evidence for.
But if you want to present some video or claim he made and ask me to refute his statements on a claim by claim basis, I will. It shouldn't be very difficult to do. I'm sure he speaks some truth though. Any good self-promoting charlatan is savvy enough to mix truth in with lies.
Until then, I'll leave you Broke Wave, who did just that in a recent thread about dude...
@
Mephistopheles according to these nikkas I'm a gay agent, because I don't agree with the logical conclusions this guy is coming to?
He said that Illegal drugs are used to supplement most major stocks on Wall Street, and that if the drug trade was stopped, Wall Street would collapse and there would be no money for pensions and retirement funds.
The global drug trade is worth 435 billion dollars a year, and that is an entire industry.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100957882
By contrast, the Automobile industry has a yearly income of about 4 trillion dollars a year and is heavily represented on Wall Street. How can an industry so small in comparison supplement the income of legitimate industries? Even if I gave you double the fire I posted, it's still totally insane to think that a 870 billion dollar industry can supplement the total value of returns in the Stock Market. Apple's market cap is 500 billion dollars, more than the total value of all the drug dealing and manufacture in the world. It's clear Dr Johnson has no idea about the scale of which he is talking about and this makes me suspicious as to the rest of what he's saying.
http://www.ibisworld.com/industry/global/global-car-automobile-sales.html
He also said that, while falsely identifying the President in 1974 as Richard Nixon (It was Gerald Ford), that Henry Kissinger in a memo recommended making homosexuality more prominent in the black community as a means of population control. This alarmed me, so I actually went and read this memo. While it is about population control, not one place does it make the willed statement that this man says it makes. It's totally insane that you people would take this on blind faith. Just do a Google search on that statement and the first link will be Dr Johnson.
http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf
If you want to respond, use links to reputable organizations, like how I've done, and maybe I'll take you seriously. Until then keep believing everything this so called "Dr." feeds you.
All i needed, was God. 
Good shyt mayne. And fukk them dudes tryna say you're his alias. How stupid and dumb is that assertion? 
A poster can call anoher poster a faq and one of you will come caping in with some words for the cat that said the "homophobic" slur.
