theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
yall already know what my suggestion is
I got accused of being an alt-right troll and reported last night because I stated that it was Hillary's job to get idiots to vote for her.
And I wouldn't be surprised if they take action against me.
Frankly, this sub has allowed a crazy person, who is widely recognized as a crazy person throughout the coli, to set the tone.
LolI don't give a fukk if I say Trump is innocent in every thread and challenge ever opinion against him . It does not make me racist . If I say DACA should be bushed it does not make me racist . If I say a democrat is a liar it does not make me racist .
I should not be bushed/warned for not following the democrat narrative . This is why we get to NEG. This is why there was a mass exodus from SOHH. People couldn't have opinions .
I am not white .
I have never voted republican in my life .
I have voted democrat every election. State and local .
I did not want to vote for Hillary . I did not want to vote for her friends . This is how it works . If I don't like your policies I'm not going to vote for the people who agree with you . This is simple . This is how politics SHOULD work .
I supported Bernie . I donated to Bernie . Put the sign in the grass . Voted Obama twice . Have voted for every Democrat possible . From governor to school board .
Stop with the false narrative you clowns is spinning .
If I challenge anything Obama/Hillary say I get 37 negs. I'm 100% sure there is a group chat of them nikkas telling each other who to neg . I don't even trip . I usually dap them up in response .
But getting warned for racism is some hoe shyt . I wouldn't give a fukk , but I feel like this might be ground work for a future bushing/banning because I don't support these RACISTS democrat s.
The first two sentences is because this forum is essentially a cliquish and HS popularity contest. A very emo bunch. The presentation should be in the information itself. A summary can be included but isn't necessary to trigger a debate. Information should present itself. I prefer things presented open ended allowing people to disseminate respond based on their experiences instead of controlled dialogue which omits the groupthink that is prevalent. Adults should be beyond handholding stage. Then again I am not the most popular person, so what do I know.Presentation of the topics. Every topic on the first page has at least 5x the views as it has responses.
Instead of posting entire articles, why not just summarize it in your own words and leave a link for interested parties to research? Your summary will cause positive or negative responses but you will have discourse.
Just figured I make this thread as I will say, outside of the few deservedly banned of alt-right trolls, I personally would love to see more diverse content and more people post in this section. I think someone posted a few months back about too much US political content and not enough of other content which I would actually agree with. I mean its understandable with our current idiot of a president but I would love to see more people contribute content of different variety. I notice @DEAD7 makes occasional spurts of effort to do this with posting five different articles about scientific advances and the like. Wish he wasn't the only one to do so.
So just out of curiosity, what would you do to encourage more people to be active in this portion of the site?
Please don't let this devolve to a flame war or use it to express personal grudges
The first two sentences is because this forum is essentially a cliquish and HS popularity contest. A very emo bunch. The presentation should be in the information itself. A summary can be included but isn't necessary to trigger a debate. Information should present itself. I prefer things presented open ended allowing people to disseminate respond based on their experiences instead of controlled dialogue which omits the groupthink that is prevalent. Adults should be beyond handholding stage. Then again I am not the most popular person, so what do I know.
Diverse content is shared but unless a topic involves politics and race, then no traction is gained. Also, you have many posters who only reply, they are not thread starters who provoke thought (@DEAD7 and few others exceptions). You can't change readership and posters, unfortunately.
I've started threads on poverty in Black America though I am not impoverished or even near middle class. I also have no interest in committing suicide or interest in euthanasia although I created a thread about an automated suicide machine. I try to share information that isn't well publicized and change perception.Just for example, I could give 2 f*cks about Trey Gowdy. Though I don't have an issue with reading long articles, I won't do so on a topic I have zero interest in. Unless you've given me a reason to do so. Which is where I feel that framing can help jump start conversation.
No most posters generally are not thread starters, that's a problem. If people shared ideas as much as they did their opinion to someone else, then there may be a different dynamic. This is the reason why there are threads started by handful of people, myself included. This attributes to the "dikkriding for daps" pandemic.I do agree with your statement about thread starters not engaging and provoking thought on the topics they start.
I disagree that it is controlled dialogue, it's opinion. I also will admit that opinions are not often honored around here but framing a conversation should not be considered a means to control that conversation's narrative.
reported :jayfdup:I don't give a fukk if I say Trump is innocent in every thread and challenge ever opinion against him . It does not make me racist . If I say DACA should be bushed it does not make me racist . If I say a democrat is a liar it does not make me racist .
I should not be bushed/warned for not following the democrat narrative . This is why we get to NEG. This is why there was a mass exodus from SOHH. People couldn't have opinions .
I am not white .
I have never voted republican in my life .
I have voted democrat every election. State and local .
I did not want to vote for Hillary . I did not want to vote for her friends . This is how it works . If I don't like your policies I'm not going to vote for the people who agree with you . This is simple . This is how politics SHOULD work .
I supported Bernie . I donated to Bernie . Put the sign in the grass . Voted Obama twice . Have voted for every Democrat possible . From governor to school board .
Stop with the false narrative you clowns is spinning .
If I challenge anything Obama/Hillary say I get 37 negs. I'm 100% sure there is a group chat of them nikkas telling each other who to neg . I don't even trip . I usually dap them up in response .
But getting warned for racism is some hoe shyt . I wouldn't give a fukk , but I feel like this might be ground work for a future bushing/banning because I don't support these RACISTS democrat s.
I got accused of being an alt-right troll and reported last night because I stated that it was Hillary's job to get idiots to vote for her.
And I wouldn't be surprised if they take action against me.
i hate that i can be so easily baited at times, but...... if better modding is so needed around here, why didn't you provide that when you were a mod....? i never had a problem with the moderation around here even when you were a mod, but you certainly didn't push for intellectual rigor....
Lewd personal attacks, reporting(with biased modding), and/or bushing is very much controlled dialogue.
Better modding and a push for intellectual rigour would do wonders for this sub forum.