Microsoft Pushed Blizzard to Hit 1080p With Diablo 3

LucaBrasi

West Coast Legend
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,052
Reputation
515
Daps
4,739
Reppin
California
PS3 was the more powerful machine all last gen and you didn't see the difference in maybe 5 years into the gen :ld:

I can't see a difference right now :yeshrug:
 

Zebruh

The Illustrious
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
5,497
Reputation
610
Daps
10,675
"4k POSSIBLE"(learn to read).... they made the tech. im sure its not hard for them to have an update to enable the ps4 to do so if your on the corresponding tv...

:ehh: and im sure they are working on it...

Nah breh, that's wishful thinking. Don't expect these games to be pushing 4k.

There is a platform that can do 4k though. :sas2:
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,565
Daps
110,435
Reppin
Bay Area
next gen huh :sas2: 50 fps at 1080p huh :sas2: with inferior graphics than PC huh :sas2:

my 2 year, going on 3 year old computer can run Diablo 3 at 1080p at 130 FPS and more graphic intense :sas2:

gonna be a long 6 or 8 years or so for xbox1 if they even make it to year 3 :sas2:
 

LucaBrasi

West Coast Legend
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,052
Reputation
515
Daps
4,739
Reppin
California
The difference was clear in ps3 exclusives... Multiplats... Not so much


Breh stop it Resistance 3 looked like a damn Ps2 game,

Wasn't until uncharted 2 n GOW 3 that you could really tell a difference.

Besides multiplats were Garbo on the 3.

Skyrim must've run at 20 FPS :scusthov:
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
48,670
Reputation
4,168
Daps
73,298
Reppin
Michigan
  1. focus on building the next console now
What about the current console? Are you suggesting less than 1 year in they abandon it?

  1. the next console should have the ability to play backwards compatible games from the 360 and the xbox one. period
You do understand that to make games easier to develop for they went away from the Power PC architecture of the Xbox 360 and went to an x86 architecture on the Xbox One and for them to make the next console backwards compatible they'd have to build the old hardware into the new. This would drive up the cost of the system.
  1. focus on the processor, the internals, have dev's come in help you with making it easier to program for
  2. no kinect or kinect optional
  3. little to no bugs/ no rrod...
  4. fast lasers, processors, download speeds,
  5. swappable hard drive, in this media app filled future having a 2tb hdd counts...

  1. rebuild the goodwill between the core gamers you lost since mattrick fukked up with the drm shyt
  2. dont hide popular apps such as netflix and youtube behind a paywall.
They're trying to do the first one of these now which is why the second one has already been done and has been done for months. They did that back in June and it's almost September and you're still suggesting they do it? It's also kinda hard to rebuild good will by moving on to your next console as fast as possible when you just put put new hardware less than a year ago.
  1. whoever buys the new xbox gets 1 free year of xbox live gold with free movie rentals through the in house xbox /msoft videos.
irrelevant.
  1. companion xbox app that works on all phone cariers like the playstation app is
just a start....
The Xbox One smartglass app works on iOS, Android, and Windows phone. Works on your PC or laptop too. what are they missing here? Again you're suggesting they do something already done.
  1. do not require the games to burn to hard drive make it optional. play games off disc if neccesary.
So what are you saying increase load times? Because that's what this suggestion would do. Blu-Ray disc are rather large and good for massive storage but not as great at read times and a HDD is way faster.

I would have loved to see how you would have navigated Sony though the first few years of PS3.
 
Top