uhhhh NO
In most cases unless the artist hasn't signed a licensing deal or publishing contract and is truly INDEPENDENT like let's say a TECH 9
he or she has NO SAY SO as to whether their music can be streamed
it is up to the PUBLISHER or whoever own the right of the music , in the case of Em and 50 it would be the distributor...
and as far as PANDORA they are FULL OF SHYT.........
these mofos HAVE BEEN LOBBYING CONGRESS hard lately just to STARVE ARTISTS more and more ...the payout they are handing out is JUST CRUMBS ON THE TABLE...
they doing all types of slick shyt...like purchasing a terrestrial broadcast station in the middle of west bubblefukk America (rapid city, south Dakota)
in order to qualify as a TRADITIONAL BROADCASTER like and AVOID THE "DIGITAL ROYALTIES" that deem to steep to be paying....
these MUFFUKAS ARE DIRTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pandora Buys a South Dakota Radio Station to Save Money | SPIN | Geek Show
By buying an FM radio station Pandora is attempting to join the nation's other traditional radio stations in paying significantly lower royalties than it's currently obligated to pony up. Right now Pandora pays out more than half of its revenue in royalties, which is why it recently instituted a 40-hour free-listening limit on mobile devices. Meanwhile, terrestrial radio stations pay a scant 1.7 percent of their annual revenue for music royalties. Many of them also stream music online, meaning a station that combines FM radio with a web stream qualifies for the favorable rates.
That's the sweet spot Pandora hopes to hit and it's already getting sued for tying. BMI, a group that competes with ASCAP and collects royalties for publishers and songwriters, sued Pandora in federal court on Thursday. "Pandoras stunt makes a mockery of performing rights licenses and the rate courts process," BMI said, while arguing that simply owning one radio station does not mean Pandora should qualify for the same rates as terrestrial stations.