Make sure you put the camera in airplane mode to conserve on battery lifeit's worth it, my only problem is the battery drains alil fast when recording video, but overall it's an excellent camera.
Make sure you put the camera in airplane mode to conserve on battery lifeit's worth it, my only problem is the battery drains alil fast when recording video, but overall it's an excellent camera.
so fellas, in yall humble opinion what camera should I get(canon) that has superb pictures and videos for 400.00 or less
True. I saw similar sales again last night. Rebates and what not.They have those deals multiple times a year.....he can still catch one
I just spent 330 on this camera and the monfukka is suppose to shoot hd quality videos but it grainy af and very terrible, and also the pictures come out terrible as well, can anyone out there with camera know how, point me in the right directiom, I feel like I wasted my money
nikon sensors are SONY sensors.Nikon's sensors trump all
NAh. Sony mirrorless camera lenses are on par with any DSLR offerings. Plus they're smaller too!I know mirrorless is the way forward. But I'm happy I got me a Nikon tha icon d5500 with 35 f1.8 prime. Mirrorless prolly has better sensors, but they still can't fukk with Canon and Nikon lenses. My next lens will be dat sigma 18-35 f1.8
NAh. Sony mirrorless camera lenses are on par with any DSLR offerings. Plus they're smaller too!
Whatever DSLR you have, im certain it isn't as small as the a5000 or my a6000. I went from a Nikon D90 (excellent camera btw) to my a6000 and the a6000 is superior in many aspects. Image quality is about 98% that of my D90 with tons and tons of more features and capabilities.my DSLR is pretty small. But that Sony a series are too small. I don't doubt Sony has great lenses, but they're more expensive than Nikon and Canon offerings. Also, Nikon and Canon lenses are more abundant and could easily get cheaper used on Craigslist or ebay.
I'm looking at either the Nikon d3300 and the a6000 comparable price range, I'm just debating the feature set.Whatever DSLR you have, im certain it isn't as small as the a5000 or my a6000. I went from a Nikon D90 (excellent camera btw) to my a6000 and the a6000 is superior in many aspects. Image quality is about 98% that of my D90 with tons and tons of more features and capabilities.
the sony a6000 is easily the best camera under $600. i would have gone mirrorless if i didn't have a friend who had a nikon dslr and really good lenses.I'm looking at either the Nikon d3300 and the a6000 comparable price range, I'm just debating the feature set.
i have a nikon d5500. believe me, i would've gone with the sony, but my friend whos a nikon user showed me the ropes during the summer and has some good nikon lenses (their full frame tho).Whatever DSLR you have, im certain it isn't as small as the a5000 or my a6000. I went from a Nikon D90 (excellent camera btw) to my a6000 and the a6000 is superior in many aspects. Image quality is about 98% that of my D90 with tons and tons of more features and capabilities.
I got my a6000 (body only) for only $370 (there was an instant rebate being offered at the time)I'm looking at either the Nikon d3300 and the a6000 comparable price range, I'm just debating the feature set.
an still trump Canon's so whats your point?nikon sensors are SONY sensors.
you cant fukk with Nikon glass brehthe sony a6000 is easily the best camera under a grand. i would have gone mirrorless if i didn't have a friend who had a nikon dslr and really good lenses.
i have a nikon d5500. believe me, i would've gone with the sony, but my friend whos a nikon user showed me the ropes during the summer and has some good nikon lenses (their full frame tho).