My homie asked his girl to sign a pre-nup. She said no

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

If you don't trust someone and the prospect of them changing worries you shouldn't marry them, you shouldn't marry anyone Like I said, pre-nups can be thrown out and you can still lose. Its really more logical for some of you to never get married with the way you feel.

I wouldn't mind if divorce wasn't an option that was on the table.


At letting my non working wife go to the casino, without me, and spend my money.

For the MILLIONTH time, asking for a prenup does not mean (or even suggest) a lack of trust.

The prospect of change? EVERYBODY changes. Life shapes us. The idea is to grow together. Unless you're GOD there's no way you could be completely sure on how things will turn out, regardless of what you believe.

No matter how hard you try to paint marriage as some mythical, fantastical union, there's risk involved. A prenup only serves to mitigate some of that risk. That's just the smart thing to do when engaging in a deal of that magnitude.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

For the MILLIONTH time, asking for a prenup does not mean (or even suggest) a lack of trust.
The prospect of change? EVERYBODY changes. Life shapes us. The idea is to grow together. Unless you're GOD there's no way you could be completely sure on how things will turn out, regardless of what you believe.
No matter how hard you try to paint marriage as some mythical, fantastical union, there's risk involved. A prenup only serves to mitigate some of that risk. That's just the smart thing to do when engaging in a deal of that magnitude.

Switch "If you think at some point you will not be able to trust someone with letting you have what you earned"... with "trust" then.

There's risk with everything, but marriage is the only thing strictly made to last forever. If you change will become a big problem for you with your spouse, I don't think marriage is for you.

You say you aren't sure (taking a risk) of people's ability to stay the same, so you get a prenup.
I tell you pre-nups are not a sure thing (taking a risk), and you still are trying to argue the logic behind getting married with your train of thought

If you are trying to protect yourself from a risk, I'm sure a pre-nup (a risky thing), wouldn't be the optimal option here. I don't think it's wise to protect your risk, with a risk.

 

[Sonianicewithis]

Also, I just wanna say. While we're over here talking about worst case scenarios, and shady ass HOES.

What troubles me the most is that this is a regular GOOD girl. And this minor issue might ruin a relationship. All she gotta do is sign it. He's not asking for anything other than the property he owns that has nothing to do with her. Why do women have to make this so emotional?

Reminds me of when i told my ex that if she got pregnant I'd get a paternity test when the kid was born. She used to get SO PISSED at the idea! I'm like, "If you know its mine, what do you have to worry about?" She'd be like "What type of girl do you think I am? If you trusted me you wouldn't even GET a test."

I Fell for the okey, court today to disestablish paternity.

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

Switch "If you think at some point you will not be able to trust someone with letting you have what you earned"... with "trust" then.

There's risk with everything, but marriage is the only thing strictly made to last forever. If you change will become a big problem for you with your spouse, I don't think marriage is for you.

You say you aren't sure (taking a risk) of people's ability to stay the same, so you get a prenup.
I tell you pre-nups are not a sure thing (taking a risk), and you still are trying to argue the logic behind getting married with your train of thought

If you are trying to protect yourself from a risk, I'm sure a pre-nup (a risky thing), wouldn't be the optimal option here. I don't think it's wise to protect your risk, with a risk.

Breh, we're talking in circles...if you think the underlined, then you don't get married. I think we both agree on that.

What you fail to understand (or accept) is that a prenup doesn't mean that you think that it will fail or fail with your spouse gouging you unfairly. It's just an acknowledgment of the FACT that there are uncertainties in every thing we do.

Put another way: You should only get married if you think KNOW it will last forever. A prenup is an admission that you are not omniscient.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

It's just an acknowledgment of the FACT that there are uncertainties in every thing we do.

What I stated (the part you bolded) is an admission of uncertainty. You are uncertain... about something.

Like I said, I just don't think it's wise to protect yourself from a risk with something that is a risk. If you were bungee jumping (a risk), you would protect yourself with a cord that had any kind of failure rate (a risk). It'd be best just not to engage in it at all, but I understand a lot of dudes are sold on the pure IDEA of just having a marriage and that the option of not having one at all is not considerable.

We will just have to agree to disagree.

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

You say you aren't sure (taking a risk) of people's ability to stay the same, so you get a prenup.
I tell you pre-nups are not a sure thing (taking a risk), and you still are trying to argue the logic behind getting married with your train of thought

Oh and this is just stupid.

We take risks every time we drive our cars. Putting on your seat belt helps mitigate the risk of injury/death. Just because it doesn't eliminate the risk, doesn't mean one shouldn't use them.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

Oh and this is just stupid.
We take risks every time we drive our cars. Putting on your seat belt helps mitigate the risk of injury/death. Just because it doesn't eliminate the risk, doesn't mean one shouldn't use them.

I don't drive my car forever with the intent of doing such for forever. Ask me if I would rather drive my car forever or not have a car and I'd give up my car with the quickness.

 

[BlvdBrawler]

Brehs, Malfoy is fine enough to be able to find dudes to comply with her "rules".

Breh, her 'rules' are that "we don't need to get married". What man *wouldn't* be fine with that? It's hilarious the way she's saying that like it's a threat.

Man: Here baby gon ahead and sign this lil prenup.
Her: *in Kain Carter voice* nikka fuuuuck you AND your prenup! I ain't signing shiiiiiiiiit! If you ain't trust me then I AIN'T marryin yo ass!!! *z-snap and neckroll*
Man:

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

I don't drive my car forever with the intent of doing such for forever. Ask me if I would rather drive my car forever or not have a car and I'd give up my car with the quickness.

Did that commentary on risk elimination versus risk mitigation really just go over your head?

 

[BlvdBrawler]

I don't drive my car forever with the intent of doing such for forever. Ask me if I would rather drive my car forever or not have a car and I'd give up my car with the quickness.

It's sad because you really thought this was a relevant way of making a point.

 

[BlvdBrawler]

Did that commentary on risk elimination versus risk mitigation really just go over your head?

Breh just.... give it up. It didn't go over his head, but DaChamp is renowned for being argumentative with no purpose behind it. I believe it is known as trolling.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

Did that commentary on risk elimination versus risk mitigation really just go over your head?

No, but you are (a) drawing illogical/non-relative parallels (b) Seat belts also have a very high failure rate and only protect you from second-impact, not the actual impact that is a result of the risk you take driving a car. A seat belt doesn't protect you from getting hit. Your purpose of a pre-nup is protect your assets from getting hit, but it is still unsure and unlike your car, you have no control over it.

Why are we still doing this back-and-forth when I've already said let's just agree to disagree We think differently. End of story.
Edit:

but DaChamp is renowned for being argumentative with no purpose .

I'm the one who said let's agree to disagree and homie was still posting to me afterwards to grasp at any point.

When I try to leave shyt alone y'all still try to argue with me. Y'all just love doing that shyt apparently. It's not me trolling if you're the one motivating the conversation.

 

[sixsixtwo]

Judges throw pre-nups out of court like frisbees..

But if he wants to walk the plank...

 

[Strapped]

Switch "If you think at some point you will not be able to trust someone with letting you have what you earned"... with "trust" then.

There's risk with everything, but marriage is the only thing strictly made to last forever. If you change will become a big problem for you with your spouse, I don't think marriage is for you.

You say you aren't sure (taking a risk) of people's ability to stay the same, so you get a prenup.
I tell you pre-nups are not a sure thing (taking a risk), and you still are trying to argue the logic behind getting married with your train of thought

If you are trying to protect yourself from a risk, I'm sure a pre-nup (a risky thing), wouldn't be the optimal option here. I don't think it's wise to protect your risk, with a risk.

TAKE A BREAK & STOP POSTING NONSENSE

 

[DaChampIsHere]

TAKE A BREAK & STOP POSTING NONSENSE

Y'all will not make this thread about me.

"We will just have to agree to disagree.". The way I live my life and perceive things will have no repercussions for you and vice versa. Trust.