This is nonsenseWow damn at Maroon 5. Streaming hurts legacy acts so bad man. Grown people don't have time to be fukking streaming all day. They would rather buy the music and listen when they can.
This is nonsenseWow damn at Maroon 5. Streaming hurts legacy acts so bad man. Grown people don't have time to be fukking streaming all day. They would rather buy the music and listen when they can.
Worst Nas album in a min
Across a full year that's hundreds of millions of streams and it def translates to a lot of money if your contract isn't fukked up. Nas is gonna EAT off Illmatic once it's fully in his control in a couple years.nikka no it's not. That 14 million streams translates to dirt nikka. Lol
Nas helped them get their stuff on Spotify/Apple. U don't remember that?Across a full year that's hundreds of millions of streams and it def translates to a lot of money if your contract isn't fukked up. Nas is gonna EAT off Illmatic once it's fully in his control in a couple years.
Another thing to remember: Illmatic is constantly being used in films and television. Ozark had multiple episodes playing damn near the entire album. That drives more streams to the album and the artist eats off that plus the licensing. That's why I felt so bad for De La when that Spider Man film had their song in the end credits. A lot of kids loved that song but couldn't stream it. Low key I think that film was the catalyst to get their stuff on Spotify/Apple.

Snoop album with Dre was the most he’s sold in years with 36k first week. Prior to that he was selling far less.
Yep, that's why these artists are selling their catalogs like crazy; they wouldn't do that if streaming made them what some people think it does.Yes. It’s between 40 something and 70k a year. Depending on the percentage. Not more than that. Streams don’t give u shyt.
Yea fam I’m not even gonna argue I have music on these platforms myself. LolYep, that's why these artists are selling their catalogs like crazy; they wouldn't do that if streaming made them what some people think it does.

This is ridiculous. Why do you think artists with catalogs that perform on streaming are being bombarded with offers? Smart investors know that they can buy a long term cash cow for quick money up front. It’s like a reverse mortgage in that it’s a terrible deal that someone who just wants the cash will take.Yep, that's why these artists are selling their catalogs like crazy; they wouldn't do that if streaming made them what some people think it does.
Taylor Swift streams roughly 4 times more than Maroon 5.Yes. It’s between 40 something and 70k a year. Depending on the percentage. Not more than that. Streams don’t give u shyt.
exactly. Bruce Springsteen would not have sold his catalog for a half billion if it was really bringing in as much as people think in a year.Yep, that's why these artists are selling their catalogs like crazy; they wouldn't do that if streaming made them what some people think it does.
nikka Taylor sells just as much as she streams. We not even gonna go there.Taylor Swift streams roughly 4 times more than Maroon 5.
You think she’s pocketing a cool 300 grand a year from them?