NASA spies Earth-sized exoplanet orbiting Sun-like star

OG_StankBrefs

Da Spice...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,537
Reputation
6,729
Daps
98,678
Reppin
Caladan
1400 light years away. That means if you could speed away to here at the speed of light. (Which we cannot do now or may never be able to do ever ) it would take 1,400 years to get there.

So if we travel at half the speed of light we'd be there in 2,800 years approximately. Ain't going to happen.

:mindblown::wow:
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,866
Reputation
4,768
Daps
123,423
Reppin
Detroit

By space standards that's down the street.

The Andromeda Galaxy (the closest spiral galaxy to us) is about 2.2 million light years away.

So if we could travel at half the speed of light it would still take us over 4 million years to go there. Hell, even if we could travel twice the speed of light (which physics says is impossible) it'd still take over a million years. And that's a close galaxy.


The universe is a big ass place. :wow:
 

OG_StankBrefs

Da Spice...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,537
Reputation
6,729
Daps
98,678
Reppin
Caladan
By space standards that's down the street.

The Andromeda Galaxy (the closest spiral galaxy to us) is about 2.2 million light years away.

So if we could travel at half the speed of light it would still take us over 4 million years to go there. Hell, even if we could travel twice the speed of light (which physics says is impossible) it'd still take over a million years. And that's a close galaxy.


The universe is a big ass place. :wow:

Geezus khrist. :dead:


Idgaf what nobody say, I luh dis kinda shyt. :wow:
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,948
Reputation
4,785
Daps
104,423
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
By space standards that's down the street.

The Andromeda Galaxy (the closest spiral galaxy to us) is about 2.2 million light years away.

So if we could travel at half the speed of light it would still take us over 4 million years to go there. Hell, even if we could travel twice the speed of light (which physics says is impossible) it'd still take over a million years. And that's a close galaxy.


The universe is a big ass place. :wow:

What I don't understand is why are we using Radio signals in space. What are the odds that other civilizations even use this form of communication? How about lasers or some other form.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,866
Reputation
4,768
Daps
123,423
Reppin
Detroit
What I don't understand is why are we using Radio signals in space. What are the odds that other civilizations even use this form of communication? How about lasers or some other form.

NASA actually does have a laser program.

NASA prepares to launch 600Mbps space laser system to replace conventional radio links | ExtremeTech
NASA Tests New Laser Communication Relay

But as far as transmitting data to other intelligent life, radio signals make more sense than lasers, because lasers have a much, much smaller wavelength than radio waves and cover less area, whereas radio waves spread out over a larger area. So a laser would be ideal for two-way communication where you know exactly where you're sending it and can focus in on it, especially since you can pack more information into a laser. But radio waves are way better for covering a large area, which is what you want when you're just sending out signals hoping somebody picks it up. In terms of speed it doesn't make a difference as they both propagate at the speed of light.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,948
Reputation
4,785
Daps
104,423
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
NASA actually does have a laser program.

NASA prepares to launch 600Mbps space laser system to replace conventional radio links | ExtremeTech
NASA Tests New Laser Communication Relay

But as far as transmitting data to other intelligent life, radio signals make more sense than lasers, because lasers have a much, much smaller wavelength than radio waves and cover less area, whereas radio waves spread out over a larger area. So a laser would be ideal for two-way communication where you know exactly where you're sending it and can focus in on it, especially since you can pack more information into a laser. But radio waves are way better for covering a large area, which is what you want when you're just sending out signals hoping somebody picks it up. In terms of speed it doesn't make a difference as they both propagate at the speed of light.

I will bet they will get more possible signals with lasers as Radio is very common in space and I will doubt a civilization would use that for cross space communication. The odds of interference is too much. We need to send these Laser signals to Sirius, Zeta Retuculli, Orion's Belt, Alpha Centauri and Saggitarus constellation.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Oso

Tommy Knocks

retired
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
27,013
Reputation
6,765
Daps
71,776
Reppin
iPaag
NASA actually does have a laser program.

NASA prepares to launch 600Mbps space laser system to replace conventional radio links | ExtremeTech
NASA Tests New Laser Communication Relay

But as far as transmitting data to other intelligent life, radio signals make more sense than lasers, because lasers have a much, much smaller wavelength than radio waves and cover less area, whereas radio waves spread out over a larger area. So a laser would be ideal for two-way communication where you know exactly where you're sending it and can focus in on it, especially since you can pack more information into a laser. But radio waves are way better for covering a large area, which is what you want when you're just sending out signals hoping somebody picks it up. In terms of speed it doesn't make a difference as they both propagate at the speed of light.
this.

did you also hear about the signals/sounds we have heard from space...twice? no one knows what they are but apparently someone is doing the same thing. probably an even larger wave.

Im glad we are finding things but I think we should put all of our energy into travel now. I mean we now know how big shyt is, we have a general map, either we need to figure out how to bend the space fabric or get so optical we can actually view galaxies and planets up close visually, like a hubble on steroids.
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,583
this.

did you also hear about the signals/sounds we have heard from space...twice? no one knows what they are but apparently someone is doing the same thing. probably an even larger wave.

Im glad we are finding things but I think we should put all of our energy into travel now. I mean we now know how big shyt is, we have a general map, either we need to figure out how to bend the space fabric or get so optical we can actually view galaxies and planets up close visually, like a hubble on steroids.
link? :wtf:
 

KingMalik

All Star
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
2,532
Reputation
1,082
Daps
10,896
By space standards that's down the street.

The Andromeda Galaxy (the closest spiral galaxy to us) is about 2.2 million light years away.

So if we could travel at half the speed of light it would still take us over 4 million years to go there. Hell, even if we could travel twice the speed of light (which physics says is impossible) it'd still take over a million years. And that's a close galaxy.


The universe is a big ass place. :wow:

It's by design breh :wow:

Whatever or whoever created the universe didn't want us communicating with each other, atleast not for a LLLLLLOOONNNGGGG time
 
Top