NBA Trade Deadline & Rumors

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Bushed
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,654
Reputation
-8,079
Daps
20,242
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
They have so many guards already, and taking Jackson would be odd because he and Brown are similar. I don't get why they'd want one of these PGs so much, unless they plan on giving Thomas the boot.




I just don't see the obsession with the 2017 pick for a team loaded with guards already, the Nets will be awful next year and next years draft has Bamba and Ayton who are more in line with what the Celtics need and them coming off the bench wouldn't be as much of a waste. Also, has Porter who is the type of player Ainge craves, 6'10" SF with an outside game.

It's the number one pick in the deepest draft in how long? Is it that out of the question fultz ball or Jackson alone could be better than butler? And you want us to give up crowder and Bradley on top of that?

These guys are projected to be on par with Wiggins who got traded for love straight up why give up two more excellent pieces?
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
677
Reputation
70
Daps
1,546
Reppin
NULL
I would do Bradley and crowder for butler but not the 2017 pick

2018? Maybe.

Include Zeller and get taj too

Thomas
Smart
Butler
Gibson
Horford

With Amir rozier olynyk brown off the bench

Why do we need another point guard? Its clear IT isnt going anywhere and most likely smart. We can keep the 2018 and still it will be a lottery pick. 2018 has big men which is who we need.

This arrogance that these picks are so special is ridiculous. We 2nd in the east, if we keeping IT and Horford we have to win sooner rather than 4 years later.
 

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,860
Daps
88,738
Reppin
Houston
It's the number one pick in the deepest draft in how long? Is it that out of the question fultz ball or Jackson alone could be better than butler? And you want us to give up crowder and Bradley on top of that?

These guys are projected to be on par with Wiggins who got traded for love straight up why give up two more excellent pieces?

What you're essentially suggesting is to hit on 19:hubie:

Sure you might catch a 2 and get 21, but you could just as easily bust when holding a solid hand:manny:
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Bushed
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,654
Reputation
-8,079
Daps
20,242
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
Why do we need another point guard? Its clear IT isnt going anywhere and most likely smart. We can keep the 2018 and still it will be a lottery pick. 2018 has big men which is who we need.

This arrogance that these picks are so special is ridiculous. We 2nd in the east, if we keeping IT and Horford we have to win sooner rather than 4 years later.

I'm perfectly fine with trading Bradley
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
677
Reputation
70
Daps
1,546
Reppin
NULL
I'm perfectly fine with trading Bradley

It's gotta be Bradley and one of those picks. We dont need another PG, and we hope that one of those picks comes close to PG/Butler. You mention Wiggins but Wiggins isnt even better than Butler or PG now and hes been in the league for 2 years. So we gonna wait 4 years for our pick to possible emerge as an all star?
 
Top