Net Neutrality is dead. Its official. Edit: FCC's new rules protect Net Neutrality

[Calmye]

Why are you surprised by democrats being corporate sell outs, OP?

not surprised at all. I want to know what the coli thinks about dems voting for this shyt and the Republicans voting against it. I'm a registered independent from Cali. Nothing shocks me with Democrats anymore

 

[tmonster]

There's a first time for everything

 

[88m3]

lol, we're going to get raped

 

[Thsnnor]

Only Independent President was George Washington. This two party system are the same version on the other side of the Isle. People tell you you don't have the right to complain if you don't vote but both choices are the same evil and not the lesser. The breaking point will hit when we have too many laws.

 

[Type Username Here]

 

[Calmye]

Feel free to add your opinion breh. I would actually like to here your opinion on the issue.

 

[gho3st]

Man i used to rep so hard for that man....

when did you find you were an idiot for doing so?


I've Obama since the day he tried to sound exactly like MLK in his acceptance speech.

 

[Starman]

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/net_neutrality_missing/

 

[Starman]

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/01/t...id-regulatory-approach-to-net-neutrality.html

Looking like a hybrid "solution" is on the way. I'm going on record as saying "net neutrality" is a poor idea. We should be trying to encourage more competition among ISPs.

 

[Yapdatfool]

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/net_neutrality_missing/

*reads comments*

* comments for once*

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/01/t...id-regulatory-approach-to-net-neutrality.html

Looking like a hybrid "solution" is on the way. I'm going on record as saying "net neutrality" is a poor idea. We should be trying to encourage more competition among ISPs.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/...-reject-risky-confusing-hybrid-net-neutrality

 

[Starman]

*reads comments*

* comments for once*



https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/...-reject-risky-confusing-hybrid-net-neutrality

*Reads article*
*Agrees we shouldn't get this thing half wrong when we could be completely right. *



Just so we're clear, applying Title II is probably the worst of all options.

 

[DEAD7]

Only Independent President was George Washington. This two party system are the same version on the other side of the Isle. People tell you you don't have the right to complain if you don't vote but both choices are the same evil and not the lesser. The breaking point will hit when we have too many laws.

Either you're for the state, or against the state at this point.

 

[Thsnnor]

Either you're for the state, or against the state at this point.

Everyone must pick a side. I've said it before and there are those who don't realize the choice they have made till its too late.

 

[Yapdatfool]

*Reads article*
*Agrees we shouldn't get this thing half wrong when we could be completely right. *



Just so we're clear, applying Title II is probably the worst of all options.

If that's the worse option, what's the best one?

What we have right now:
When sites like youtube and netfilx are artificially throttled by ISP's until they make 'fast lane deals' with each and every single ISP, raising costs. How long until residents start having to do the same thing?
Where consumers have no such competition to choose from because broadband is primarily supplied by cable companies and the legal monopolies they bought & paid for within all 50 states?

I think before we ever get around to doing anything with net neutrality, we need to eliminate legal monopolies for broadband/cable services, then split those things up due to conflict of interest.

And seem as though that ain’t happening, title 2 looks to be the best of the worse options we got.

 

[Ghost_In_A_Shell]

Now that you think about, it's pretty pointless to have an argument about 'Net Neutrality' when we only have two broadband service providers(Att and Comcast) N N would only address the symptoms but not the actual problem itself- Monopolies with holds over the industry.