Trajan
Veteran
Also I thought Hitler was a failed artist?
Part of the reason why he was so mad...he couldn't get on
Part of the reason why he was so mad...he couldn't get on
Black coli militants (white trolls) going to be conflicted today![]()
WRONG. There has to be a level of skill in a piece.
You can have an emotional attachment to a work but, all bad pieces lack things like depth, clarity, understanding of light and shadows,nuanced brushwork, interesting/provocative themes, etc.
When the talent outweighs the bad shyt they did,or you can find reasoning in the bad shyt
Saying you see good in Hitler basically means you see some good in him killing a bunch of jews ,and being a racist who thought whites were the superior race.
If thats what you believe stand on it,don't hide behind fake deep/enlightened nonsense![]()
With this obtuse, recycled Art gibberish!
One's "emotional attachment" (or lack thereof) to any artwork clearly makes it subjective.
No she didn’t just saying that Hitler has skill as a painter. She tried to use hitler’s skill as a painter as evidence that there was good in him. Good thing the interviewer checked her on that dumb shytdoesn't sound like she's defending hitler. She's just saying he wad skill as a painter, which is true.
With this obtuse, recycled Art gibberish!
One's "emotional attachment" (or lack thereof) to any artwork clearly makes it subjective.
"Fathers of this country" are called great men and they owned plantations and human beings. Many of them openly contradicted their own writings about men and freedom..No she didn’t just saying that Hitler has skill as a painter. She tried to use hitler’s skill as a painter as evidence that there was good in him. Good thing the interviewer checked her on that dumb shyt
Sad to say, but she’s the typical fake deep bird brain. That “why I can’t say that?” response to being challenged was rich.
You no puss getters fukk up a lot of threads with your thirsty contest deflections![]()