It is...
But scaring people in order to get them to do/behave as you want, or believe they should, will never sit well with me.
Fear of an existential threat compels us to make changes. And given the nature and severity of the threat we should be afraid BUT not to the point it puts us in hopeless stupor. We have to overcome this notion that highlighting the raw scientific facts is "fear mongering".
How else would you present such an urgent and existential issue as ecological collapse? This is a serious question btw. This isn't a left or right issue. We'll need both market solutions and big government to work around this issue. We shouldn't be so grounded in our ideologies that we aren't able to accept the need for both measures.
Total ecological collapse means the deaths of hundreds of millions (if not billions) of people and the potential collapse of industrial civilization within the course of a human lifetime.
Last edited:
It is...
But scaring people in order to get them to do/behave as you want, or believe they should, will never sit well with me.
