I said cac or c00n. Pick your title.
Nick Cannon on Slavery Never Existing If it Weren't for Guns
- Thread starter agpxknt
- Start date
why are people so fukking stupid? Slavery existed for thousands of years before guns
Exactly.
U act just like ur mother
This is correct. I am currently reading the story of the Last Cargo slave and he (Kassola, Cudjo Lewis, the last cargo) mentioned the Dahomey King/Empire how they would capture slaves. He, the last cargo, Kassola, was capture by the Dahomey King who beheaded Kassola's King in his hometown who tried to prevent the attack on his village. The king from Kassola's hometown didn't want to be brought back to Dahomey to be a slave so they beheaded him, by one of the Dahomey women warriors. The Dahomey Empire had women warriors who would round up the Africans who was trying to escape and behead them. Beheading the ppl was like a bragging right or something, (I may need to re-read that part again) they would carry the heads back to Dahomey, each men sometimes carrying 2 to 3 heads, along with the ppl that they captured. They had guns when they would raid these places along with machetes and knives
That's a great book to get, every black person should get it, The Last Cargo, the dude, Kassola really goes into depth on how the Dahomey King would capture and sell slaves. There were newspaper articles that the king of Dahomey put out that reached all the way over to the Americas, all the way down to Alabama that stated the Dahomey King was selling slaves, even after the end of the Trans-slave trade was announced by Britain, US and France. The Dahomey King still wanted to sell slaves, also cacs that were in Africa, would ignite the kings to start wars with neighboring tribes to get slaves, that played a big part as well. The Dahomey King would sell the slaves, the cacs couldn't dock their ships on the coast, so the ships would be out in the ocean, along the boarders, so they would have to use small life-size boats to transport the slaves off the shore to the ships, they would load the slaves, and the Dahomey King would send some of his warriors to recapture the slaves from the cacs on some getting over type shyt, some times it worked, some times it didn't, but most of the time those that were captured were sold.
But that book goes into real dark details on how The Dahomey Kings did their thing.
Last edited:
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
so you believe this one small group just went around the world & did what they chose¿
those in power used those under their power to their benefit
it's the same story worldwide
*
They had guns. While everyone else had close hand combat weapons or bows that took longer to load than a gun that held rounds. The people who can kill more faster will always win. How is this not hard to understand?
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
when did euros touchdown & bring the murder.game to africa like you claim¿
euros was dying on the trip there then needed tour guides because they ain't know where the fukk they was
sick starving smaller #'s on foreign soil with limited ammo
where's your natural sense at b¿
*
Indiglow Meta (R$G)
Ultra.
opinions in here
Also, with the selling of slaves, let's also remember, nobody thought that these slaves would be treated badly how these cacs treated them. raped, hung, pissed on, spit on, dehumanized, the cacs did this. Let's most 100 keep that in mind.
Let's keep that in mind as well. Slaves being sold to cacs and treated by cacs was wayyyyyy different to how the slave treatment was done in Africa.
A small portion of Kings in Africa, very small may have had a hand in aid'n but let's not think they knew how badly the cacs would treat the Africans.
Let's keep that in mind as well. Slaves being sold to cacs and treated by cacs was wayyyyyy different to how the slave treatment was done in Africa.
A small portion of Kings in Africa, very small may have had a hand in aid'n but let's not think they knew how badly the cacs would treat the Africans.
xoxodede
Superstar
This is about the Transatlantic Slave Trade -- and it wasn't just about land.
And apparently those Africans Kings/Leaders felt it was "even" -- even though we know it wasn't. They got played -- but at that time they didn't care or see/understand that they were.
It was about guns and goods. More so guns and weapons to expand and protect their [tribe/kingdom] land -- from other tribes but also whites.
Many African kingdoms opened themselves up to trouble and land grab by involving themselves with Whites -- for trading of slaves or trading in general.
A king of Dahomey [Agadja] once requested that Europeans establish a firearms factory in his nation, but this request went ignored. Firearms became necessary for African nations to defend themselves both from African rivals as well as from European intrusion, but the only way to acquire these weapons was through the slave trade. This situation only benefited the competing European powers that were able to play Africans against each other.
They are giving Europeans WAY too much credit
Yeah Europeans are so gully they just ran up in Africa bussin and making people lay down
No
They had to manipulate and finesse as well as use the disunity among seperate tribes against them
If it wasnt for that they wouldnt have done shyt but catch malaria and get their asses beat in a 1 v 1
No shyt. But at the end of the day, the raped, pillaged, killed, and stole everything from Africa. Trying to blame a few Africans for selling their own is cac racist talking points and Kanye would happily approve you type of nikkas.
Afghan militants had US made weaponry that was superior to Soviet junk
