Nike out here :cape: for the King y'all

[blackzeus]

Where's the "shift" smiley, UA is gangsta, I'll give 'em that

 

[King Poetic]

all u nikkas in here with WHAT IF'S..... point of the matter warriors are champions and coach lebron and crew lost...

so the king got his shyt took for this year, so move on

 

[blackzeus]

all u nikkas in here with WHAT IF'S..... point of the matter warriors are champions and coach lebron and crew lost...

so the king got his shyt took for this year, so move on

Technically speaking he got his sh*t took 2 years in a row, and 4 times altogether. Not to mention without the 2nd best SG of our generation and a HOF PF he probably gets his sh*t taken 6 times straight. I don't know in what country you can get violated as a man so many times and still be the King of your domain

 

[sfgiants]

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Ima Bron fan,but that would just have lead to an up and down game which the Warriors would have thrived in,if Cavs would have had Love we might have been able to pull it off, but Kyrie and Love? No

As I said Cavs had a better chance without Kyrie far as winning the Championship.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

No. That leads to a faster pace game. Means more possessions for both teams. More scoring chances and even on wide open shots Cleveland could not convert. You've clearly never seen what Kevin love and half the time kyrie Irving look like on the defensive end of the court. Those dudes are turnstiles.

When is TheColi gonna stop saying this nonsense?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

It's common basketball sense

Plus with Love on the court there's a higher chance for offensive rebounds which TT demolished while Bogut struggled up against the first 2 games since TT grabs almost half his boards offemsively. Love won't hustle and muscle out a big man for a board and he still lacks the post-season experience which is why he fell off in rebounding from the first round. Draymond and Bogut would have a field day

at this whole post.

 

[Bledswole]

They did have a better chance without Kyrie IMO

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

They did have a better chance without Kyrie IMO

*looks at your rep and then understands this comment*

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

They did have a better chance without Kyrie IMO

This is false. It couldn't be further from the truth.

 

[Maluma]

people forgetting that the cavs offense from jan-apr produced at a historic rate (@Rigby. you got the official stats on those lineups/pt differentials?), including dropping 110 on these same warriors at the Q?

not saying cavs win, but it would've been much more competitive in games 4-6 and the series definitely goes 7 (or to phrase it better I don't think the cavs lose a single home game). You keep forgetting that having those 2 increases the rotation and prevents early fatigue. Games 4 and 6 were lost more by fatigue than people want to admit.

 

[Makavalli]

"Its Cleveland" lol thats the most depressing line of Ether ever. Was this supposed to be Bron's suicide letter?

 

[Rigby.]

people forgetting that the cavs offense from jan-apr produced at a historic rate (@Rigby. you got the official stats on those lineups/pt differentials?), including dropping 110 on these same warriors at the Q?

not saying cavs win, but it would've been much more competitive in games 4-6 and the series definitely goes 7 (or to phrase it better I don't think the cavs lose a single home game). You keep forgetting that having those 2 increases the rotation and prevents early fatigue. Games 4 and 6 were lost more by fatigue than people want to admit.

I don't but per game, they had a 4.415 point differential and overall season, they had a 367 point differential. Pretty sure that's pure regular season which would still count pre-January Cleveland.

 

[Rigby.]

The Cleveland offense + defense with Irving and Love was better than the result you got without the two

 

[Bledswole]

*looks at your rep and then understands this comment*

Rep don't mean shyt shut up dumbass