nikkas in 2014 still praying to a white Jesus to solve their problems
- Thread starter Donald J Trump
- Start date
Either way you look at it, he never existedAlright breh, shalawam.
QamYasharahla
All Star
Either way you look at it, he never existed
Yeah...white people decided to white wash an image of someone who never existed. Makes sense.
Perfect sense.
Religion is a mental illness.
Praying to "God" to help you with your bills in 2014
where are the facts to support these claims? You probably still can't pay your bills and you don't believe in Him
you can't just limit him to having blonde hair and blue eyes.....that is the cacs' way of making history HIS STORY
Larry Lobster
/-_-\
I heard they don't eat meat...How come that Rastafarian last supper don't have at least 1 beef patty on the table?
JuvenileHell
Veteran
Religion in 2014 
Religion is a mental illness
Praying to "God" to help you with your bills in 2014
u ever watch the show true detective on hbo? in one scene matthew mcconaughey's character talks about how some linguistic anthropologists feel that religion is a virus. ill find the scene for u.
@3 minutes but the whole video is good
Last edited:
FrederickDouglas
All Star
Praying to white Jesus or black Jesus or biracial Jesus is not going to fix the problem.
At best, it's an emotional balm. At worst, it's a diversion and a false hope.
It really doesn't matter what the original color of the man in these Middle Eastern mythologies was. Once it became the state religion of Rome, grew into the Catholic Church, was revised by the Protestants, and forced back onto slaves, it was an entirely different beast.
Blacks were indoctrinated with a white Jesus and, only after embracing the Christian faith, argue that Jesus wasn't white in order to justify their beliefs.
Jesus, if such a man existed (although he would not possess any supernatural powers) most likely wasn't white, but the majority of black people adopt Christianity due to white supremacy and its revisionist history.
At best, it's an emotional balm. At worst, it's a diversion and a false hope.
It really doesn't matter what the original color of the man in these Middle Eastern mythologies was. Once it became the state religion of Rome, grew into the Catholic Church, was revised by the Protestants, and forced back onto slaves, it was an entirely different beast.
Blacks were indoctrinated with a white Jesus and, only after embracing the Christian faith, argue that Jesus wasn't white in order to justify their beliefs.
Jesus, if such a man existed (although he would not possess any supernatural powers) most likely wasn't white, but the majority of black people adopt Christianity due to white supremacy and its revisionist history.
QamYasharahla
All Star
Nothing you just said changes the truth of the Bible, so it's irrelevant.
it's actually pretty widely excepted that he did exist.Either way you look at it, he never existed
whats disputed is if he actually could perform miracles and other supernatural stuff.
but a 30 something jewish rabbi named jesus was crucified back then along with alot of other people.
just like with MLK jr people didn't like him much during his time. but future generations started to treat him like a Saint
1000 years from now people will be saying that MLK jr rose tupac from the dead.
are the stories about him true? prolly not.
did he exist? yes
and the message he preached was a positive one.
FrederickDouglas
All Star
What truth of the Bible?
I've read the Bible cover to cover and there's no difference between it and Mahabharata, The Illiad, and Lord of the Rings. It's a fictional story with a few good morals thrown in among the myths.
Although there are many parts of the Bible that are morally reprehensible. I don't see how anyone with a modicum of intelligence or a shred of decency could hold such garbage in high esteem.
QamYasharahla
All Star
What truth of the Bible?
I've read the Bible cover to cover and there's no difference between it and Mahabharata, The Illiad, and Lord of the Rings. It's a fictional story with a few good morals thrown in among the myths.
Although there are many parts of the Bible that are morally reprehensible. I don't see how anyone with a modicum of intelligence or a shred of decency could hold such garbage in high esteem.
First off, I seriously doubt you read the Bible 'cover to cover' and if you did, it's clear you were unable to understand it. And what I referred to as the truth of the Bible was not referring to whether the accounts of the Bible are 'real', but rather what it says. People like you who routinely change where the goal posts are is pretty sickening. First the argument is Blacks worship a white Jesus, and then it gets PROVEN wrong according to the Bible that Jesus wasn't white. Then people like you will claim the Bible is a 'white man's book', and use the same white picture of Jesus that was already proven to be biblically incorrect to justify that statement. If it's not that, it's that the Bible was stolen from Egyptian history and tampered with, which then still begs the question then of how it's NOT your book to begin with. If people don't believe in the Bible that's fine, but stop making up bullshyt to support your narrative. That's some tricks of the white man that y'all picked up along the way.
So are aliens, yet there are no proof that they did.