No conspiracy: The Plane & The Pentagon

TKOK

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
8,894
Reputation
800
Daps
25,672
Reppin
Sactown
Good looks on the link


Still confused as to why I've never seen video/pics.
they did didn't they, or are you talking about something other than that grainy vid we say.?

also if you ever look at pics of the aftermath there is plane debris just not very big. if you have high velocity impacts with planes they tend to shred a lot of the plane up.
 
Last edited:

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,020
Daps
122,435
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
BuddyOmar said:
:mjlol: Yeah fukking right. God knows how much footage they're withholding from other feeds and that's not even including all of the other tapes they confiscated.

If 'God' knows, ask 'it' for the footage. An argument from silence doesn't prove your assertion is true.​
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,352
Daps
31,306
Reppin
NULL
If 'God' knows, ask 'it' for the footage. An argument from silence doesn't prove your assertion is true.​

Ok, so take another expression literally. Never said it was absolute truth, I just know bullshyt when I smell it. You're a good soldier (or is it Marine?) so I know your allegiance in this case is unwavering.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,020
Daps
122,435
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
BuddyOmar said:
Ok, so take another expression literally. Never said it was absolute truth, I just know bullshyt when I smell it. You're a good soldier (or is it Marine?) so I know your allegiance in this case is unwavering.

No, I spent three days at Ground Zero as a First Responder. I looked for answers and found them. Also,​

Poisoning the Well
This sort of "reasoning" involves trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it true or false) about the person. This "argument" has the following form:
  1. Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented.
  2. Therefore any claims person A makes will be false.
This sort of "reasoning" is obviously fallacious. The person making such an attack is hoping that the unfavorable information will bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they will reject any claims he might make. However, merely presenting unfavorable information about a person (even if it is true) hardly counts as evidence against the claims he/she might make.

:sas2:
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,352
Daps
31,306
Reppin
NULL
No, I spent three days at Ground Zero as a First Responder. I looked for answers and found them. Also,​



:sas2:

:skip: Call out my fallacy and respond with an appeal to authority, nice one. You and a shyt ton of other people were first responders... and? Too many inconsistencies in the gubment tale for me to believe breh. Knowing the U.S. government, this is just one of them ones.
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,352
Daps
31,306
Reppin
NULL
No, I spent three days at Ground Zero as a First Responder. I looked for answers and found them. Also,​



:sas2:

Btw, I wasn't trying to imply your bias means what you're saying is false. They're not one in the same, obviously that's fallacious. I just wanted to know why you don't question the official story whatsoever.
 
Top