No conspiracy: The Plane & The Pentagon

[Deezy314619]

Not to mention the OWNER of the towers got disaster insurance on the two buildings the very same year as their destruction. If I take out a life insurance policy on my wife and she turns up dead later that year them people finna knock on my door before I get that check. No matter the circumstance. Stop thinking with your head and use your soul. It's a reason the 90's seem so nostalgic and it ain't cause of Jordan. It's because the world we live in now ain't adding up.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Not making a joke but I want to frame this in an example we can readily relate to. In the movie

Comparing a real life event to a movie script is not exactly comparing apples to apples.​

The bolded is highlighted for it's irony. If there are holes or inconsistencies in ANY story there is a conspiracy, usually a lie.

Wrong. As an example, I can point out several inconsistencies in the Theory of Evolution and the Big Bang Theory. None of them are enough to falsify them or indicate a conspiracy. They are merely the most probable explanations based on evidence.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Not to mention the OWNER of the towers got disaster insurance on the two buildings the very same year as their destruction. If I take out a life insurance policy on my wife and she turns up dead later that year them people finna knock on my door before I get that check. No matter the circumstance. Stop thinking with your head and use your soul. It's a reason the 90's seem so nostalgic and it ain't cause of Jordan. It's because the world we live in now ain't adding up.

​

In the real world things that can be considered coincidences happen all the time. Sometimes even coincidences that are so unlikely that they are almost incredible. Of course most coincidences are actually much more likely to happen than we usually think.

Just as a random example, suppose that an asteroid makes a close encounter with the Earth, and the same day that this close encounter happens, a big earthquake happens somewhere on Earth. Coincidence? Well, that's actually very likely: Every year there are over a thousand earthquakes of magnitude 5 or higher on Earth. The likelihood that on a very specific day a significant earthquake happens is actually not that surprising. The two incidents may very well not be related at all, but just happened on the same day.

In conspiracy theory land, however, there are no such things as coincidences. Everything always happens for a reason, and everything is always related somehow.

It's not impossible for even extremely unlikely coincidences to sometimes happen, but conspiracy theorists just love to take even the likeliest of coincidences and jump to conclusions. Just to add another piece of "evidence" for their shotgun argumentation.

You dudes never learn and keep using the same bad reasoning.

​

 

[Deezy314619]

Comparing a real life event to a movie script is not exactly comparing apples to apples.​

​

I said it was example that we can relate to. Do I need to bring up a REAL robbery where then art would imitate life? NO. Don't play w/ me. You knew what I meant and it was a good example.

Wrong. As an example, I can point out several inconsistencies in the Theory of Evolution and the Big Bang Theory. None of them are enough to falsify them or indicate a conspiracy. They are merely the most probable explanations based on evidence.

Bruh. You using two ideas ABOUT THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE WE KNOW TODAY is dumb, and trying to insult my intelligence. We weren't there. I'm not finna argue w/ you cause obviously you don't want to listen to reason. I ain't come in his thread trolling or talking out the side of my neck. I brought facts. Have fun living in your fishbowl existence. I also saw you criticize God earlier in the thread. I can't see eye-to-eye w/ any heathen who believes the intricacies and beauty of life aren't designed by an almighty power.

And PS there are no coincidences in life

 

[Leasy]

Shyt how about Rice calling the mayor of San Fran and telling him don't fly on that specific day the day before,

 

[DaddyTime]

all the buildings just as far away from both towers as WTC7 were hit. The others were either very short buildings which didn't have to support a massive load above or had no fire. Only Building 7 had unfought fires and the massive load of 40 stories above them.

It just so happens only WTC7 caught on fire and was destroyed out of all the buildings in that area y'all, the smaller buildings could handle it, not WTC7 though, it was supporting a massive load of 40 stories!

It caved like a demo, due to fire? So did the debris ignite or were flaming balls of debris hurtling towards this building and none others?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I said it was example that we can relate to.​

Which was scripted to play-out in a certain fashion. The 9/11 attacks were not. That is my only criticism.​

Bruh. You using two ideas ABOUT THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE WE KNOW TODAY is dumb, and trying to insult my intelligence. We weren't there.

That's EXACTLY my point. We weren't there for that event. We weren't there for the events on 9/11. All we can do is look at the evidence we have and come to the most probable explanation.​

I'm not finna argue w/ you cause obviously you don't want to listen to reason.

You came in here trying to put forth a theory that was plausible to you. I pointed-out problems with your theory that make it implausible and evidence that falsifies it completely. I'm all for reason, you're just not providing me with enough to believe your story.
​

I ain't come in his thread trolling or talking out the side of my neck. I brought facts.

Your facts were contrived and based on speculation instead of evidence. You also conveniently leave out facts which completely contradict your theory. This is why I don't think your theory is plausible.​

Have fun living in your fishbowl existence.

​

Conspiracy theories in general, and the "n% of people doubt the story" claims in particular, also appeal to a sense of rebellion in people.

As Wikipedia puts it, "a rebellion is, in the most general sense, a refusal to accept authority."

People don't want to be sheep who are patronized by authority and told what they have to do and how they have to think. People usually distrust authorities and many believe that authorities are selfish and abuse people for their own benefit. This is an extremely fertile ground for conspiracy theories.

This is so ingrained in people that a sentence like "the official story" has basically become a synonym for "a coverup/lie". Whenever "the official story" is mentioned, it immediately makes people think that it's some kind of coverup, something not true.

Conspiracy theorists are masters at abusing this psyhcological phenomenon for their advantage. They basically insinuate that "if you believe the official story then you are gullible because you are being lied to". They want to make it feel that doubting the original story is a sign of intelligence and logical thinking. However, believing a conspiracy theory usually shows, quite ironically, a great lack of logical thinking.

And PS there are no coincidences in life

Kurtis Blow and I have the same birthday. That's a coincidence.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

It just so happens only WTC7 caught on fire

You can run from a lie, but it'll always catch-up to you......​

There are other buildings the same distance to the twin towers that weren't damaged...

​

 

[DaddyTime]

You're leaving out the FACT that all the buildings in the area were hit which completely falsifies what you stated here.....

​

It just so happens only WTC7 caught on fire and was destroyed out of all the buildings in that area y'all, the smaller buildings could handle it, not WTC7 though, it was supporting a massive load of 40 stories!

It caved like a demo, due to fire? So did the debris ignite or were flaming balls of debris hurtling towards this building and none others?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

This video shows a large rip in the south side of building 7 before it collapsed. Evidence the building was far more damaged than conspiracy theorists suggest. Note the smoke coming directly from the rip and not building 6 as conspiracy theorists suggest. At 1:33 Min into the video someone says (Firefighters and police were the only ones allowed in the area so it is most likely a firefighter or policeman) "Look at the hole in that building... 7 world... that might come down". Anyone seeing this and suggesting no one knew the building was going to come down is lying.

​

 

[Flay Mayweather]

@*L*E*G*A*C*Y*

 

[Primetime21]

one of my friends' pops was working in the pentagon on 9/11, no offense to anyone here but I'll take his word for it on whether or not a plane crashed into the building

 

[DaddyTime]

​

Since you have all the answers

What exactly caused WTC7 to fall? Because that fire in the video couldn't bring down a tree house.

 

[Buckeye Fever]

Suge shot me

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

No, it didn't. If you've ever seen a controlled demolition, you'd know that they start from the bottom of the structure and let gravity pull it down. By contrast, the Towers' collapses were initiated near the top where the planes hit.

Also, a controlled demolition normally has the structure fall into it's own footprint. By comparison, the Towers both fell in a radius covering several city blocks. Neither building 'imploded'.​

110 stories collapsed into what was essentially dust.......I don't think there was hardly any large debris at all