No Thread on Kerr Shlttin on all these NBA Old Head?

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,371
Daps
7,683
Reppin
NULL
It's not about being better, he's not the same as them, his athleticism is a huge step up over them especially defensively. He's an evolution which is what I was saying.

Can he play an entire game on the block...back to basket?

Shaq was an evolution as well. Hell, you can say Shaq was a physical evolution as opposed to a simple skill set change of modern players.
 

duncanthetall

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
45,657
Reputation
4,600
Daps
151,299
Reppin
WHODEY/BIGBLUE/SNOWGANG/MIDNIGHTBOYZ
Yea cellular technology :mjgrin:



He specifically said human evolution and in context with everything else he stated, let's not play dumb because the same argument has been said here

Im just in awe of it tho, to be honest. In a few decades we've physically "evolved" but only in athletics :pachaha:
Think you're arguing semantics. I highly doubt he means that human beings have evolved in such a short span of time. The game has evolved. The way we expect people 6'8 and higher to play and maneuver has changed.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,351
Daps
241,493
He's just regurgitating flawed, oversimplified and unimaginative sarcasm. Many pundits, some respected and others not as respected, have shytted on his take.
:dead:

This is probably the most nonsensical thing I've read this week, and that's saying something because believe you me I've read some bullshyt. How exactly is it flawed? And even if it was "unimaginative", what's the difference if it was or wasn't? - that leads me to believe that you aren't viewing this shyt in an objective manner. Many pundits also agree with Kerr too, that point of bringing them up is what exactly?

What is wrong with his reasoning? Cause from where I'm sitting he's completely right.:jbhmm:
 

UserNameless

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
36,629
Reputation
3,390
Daps
65,971
Reppin
Everywhere...You never there.
:dead:

This is probably the most nonsensical thing I've read this week, and that's saying something because believe you me I've read some bullshyt. How exactly is it flawed? And even if it was "unimaginative", what's the difference if it was or wasn't? - that leads me to believe that you aren't viewing this shyt in an objective manner. Many pundits also agree with Kerr too, that point of bringing them up is what exactly?

What is wrong with his reasoning? Cause from where I'm sitting he's completely right.:jbhmm:

Of he would be right to you...you're on this bytch constantly obsessively arguing in favor of all things GS. :mjlol:
 
Top