wonder wha her husband is thinkin lol
No Thread on this Travis Rudolph case…? Edit: NOT Guilty!
- Thread starter AAKing23
- Start date
n left a digital trail
@20:40The Lead Attorney is funny as hell reacting to this testimony
WATCH LIVE: Ex-NFL Player Murder Trial — FL v. Travis Rudolph
Former NFL football player Travis Rudolph stands trial for allegedly opening fire at a group of people in Palm Beach County, Florida in April 2021, killing o...www.youtube.com
"Keyshawn didn't have a car at that time so we had to take his mom's car"
@21:20 "I called shotgun"
Should of called AR
Then what were you saying in the first text then? Could you please clarify?
nikka talks a lot just try to skip thru it7 HOURS nikka
You got to timestamp this shyt next time bruh. I just spent 3 minutes watching this nikka introduce his fans
O.T.I.S.
Veteran
Forgot about the husband
O.T.I.S.
Veteran
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
i've already clarified in the second quote. i will do so again. it was the gf who tstified to it so my understanding is he told that to the gf, after an exchange, then later the brother gets involved and he tried to talk to the defendant. and the gf was also texting the defendants brother and the sister, which the defendants sister also texted something like "come over here and you will die" or something like that. i don't know what order it was all in.
but travis didn't text the brother pull up, just like the gf didn't text travis that they were going to kill him or whatever. at least so far as i've seen the evidence, but the defendants case just started so more/other evidence could come out
but the bottom line with the "pull up" comment is going to someone's mental state which is a factor in criminal charges. it's called mens rea and it has to be established for a conviction. what does "pull up" used in a heated argument mean to you?
in a legal sense, it could be considered an agreement to engage in a fight, which is called "mutual combat" and is not a defense to lethal force.
Last edited:
well it was the gf who tstified to it so my understanding is he told that to the gf, after an exchange, then later the brother gets involved and he tried to talk to the defendant. and the gf was also texting the defendants brother and the sister, which the defendants sister also texted something like "come over here and you will die" or something like that. i don't know what order it was all in.
but travis didn't text the brother pull up, just like the gf didn't text travis that they were going to kill him or whatever. at least so far as i've seen the evidence, but the defendants case just started so more/other evidence could come out
but the bottom line with the "pull up" comment is going to someone's mental state which is a factor in criminal charges. it's called mens rea and it has to be established for a conviction. what does "pull up" used in a heated argument mean to you?
in a legal sense, it could be considered an agreement to engage in a fight, which is called "mutual combat" and is not a defense to lethal force.
So you were speaking falsehoods in the posts I quoted?
O.T.I.S.
Veteran
Ohhh… so it’s HIS fault nowi've already clarified in the second quote. i will do so again. it was the gf who tstified to it so my understanding is he told that to the gf, after an exchange, then later the brother gets involved and he tried to talk to the defendant. and the gf was also texting the defendants brother and the sister, which the defendants sister also texted something like "come over here and you will die" or something like that. i don't know what order it was all in.
but travis didn't text the brother pull up, just like the gf didn't text travis that they were going to kill him or whatever. at least so far as i've seen the evidence, but the defendants case just started so more/other evidence could come out
but the bottom line with the "pull up" comment is going to someone's mental state which is a factor in criminal charges. it's called mens rea and it has to be established for a conviction. what does "pull up" used in a heated argument mean to you?
in a legal sense, it could be considered an agreement to engage in a fight, which is called "mutual combat" and is not a defense to lethal force.
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
if you want it to be that way
but the reality is the guy was charged and somethign about his actions had something to do with it.
if you want it to be that way
You must be related to Dominique Jones...
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
just a non-emotional person who is actually watching the trial. and plenty of people have agreed with me in the thread
Ya'll let these anti black misandrists on this site for reason I can't understand.
The God Poster
LWO representa
Anytime I see male or female posters who deep into that gender war bs I
Not gone have me arguing with fools like that. Anybody engaging in that deserve 6ft