What's the evidence?
O.J. Simpson Granted Parole in Unanimous Vote, Will Be Released Oct. 1st
- Thread starter jadillac
- Start date
seemorecizzy
Superstar
He didn't
But he clearly knows what happened
Hes protecting someone out of love or fear
I'm guessing you buy that the cops planted all the evidence..I don't. Them and the forensic team did a lot of dumb shyt that clearly proved they weren't geniuses capable of framing a millionaire star football player.
but those mistakes ended up making it seem like they tried to.Before they even knew OJ didn't have an alibi they would have had to constructed this grand scheme which could have backfired. OJ could've been at a public event, out of town, anything.
No clear alibi and the first detectives didn't box him into one (fukked them up at trial)
DNA evidence including blood and hair (even if they claimed some evidence was contaminated in the lab that wouldn't have made it turn into OJ's)
Picture of him wearing the same shoes that they identified the murderer to have been wearing
Being suicidal afterwards when he's accused (the entire bronco chase not used in the case)
No concrete story on where the deep cut wound on his hand came from
Also that deep wound is on the same hand that the murderer left the leaking blood trail
The lady seeing him speeding from that direction and calling 911 reporting it before the news of the murder broke (Not included in the trial because she took TV money)
Receipts showing Nicole purchased the same gloves at the murder scenes for OJ (his manager admitted that he told OJ don't take his arthritis meds so the glove wouldn't fit if they tried it)
His limo driver getting there early, constantly buzzing in but no one seems to be home. Then he sees someone jumping over the gate and shortly later all of a sudden OJ comes to the door saying he overslept
Last edited:
Are u aware that when they took blood from oj Simpson the detective kept it for three hours and was at the crime scen with it, also the vial had a quarter of it missing.. a total of 30 drops.I'm guessing you buy that the cops planted all the evidence..I don't. Them and the forensic team did a lot of dumb shyt that clearly proved they weren't geniuses capable of framing a millionaire star football player.
Before they even knew OJ didn't have an alibi they would have had to constructed this grand scheme which could have backfired. OJ could've been at a public event, out of town, anything.
also just think for a second, if he stabbed both of them he would be drenched with blood, his bronco would be full of it, not just little spots here and there.. those spots of blood were put there.
Yeah I know about him admitting to taking the blood around with him that's why I said I don't think they planted ALL the evidence. That part along with Fuhrman pleading the fifth and the glove not fitting were probably the three hugest Ws for OJ in the case. Go back and check my edit there's more stuff I had put up there. Yeah it seems like there would be more blood but I feel like there's more showing he did it and than didn't. Some specific things like where did the weapon and clothes go along with not a lot of blood always stick out to me.
Breh if they planted the blood then who knows what else the planted, the hair they could have very well planted when they were at his house.
The people that seen him drive away and the limo driver u CANNOT trust, one they were probably white and also the prosecutors influence u to say shyt for the most part.
The gloves just don't make sense at all, u telling me he loses on at the crime scene and then loses the other at home?? Like really?
Those gloves were most likely both left there and the detective picked it up and dropped it off at his house.. it not fitting was due to leather shrinking, the size was large and when he tried a new pair they fit perfect.. the gloves and shoes matching that he did own those things is the only thing that will wonder if he did it BUT is that enough for u to say he did the crime?.. what if u owned both things and lived in the area, does that prove u did it?
It's circumstantial evidence but you gotta admit that's one hell of a coincidence..it wouldn't make me guilty but anyone else would've got the death penalty with that evidence..planted or not. Believe me I don't trust cacs but the lady called 911 at that time and supposedly gave them the same plate # of the Bronco but it was off by one letter/number.
I heard about a witness say they saw a bronco speeding away or something but I never heard of a lady calling 911 at the time so I can't comment that, but u are right that the circumstantial evidence would have probably got u or me in prison. I would hope that the jurors would consider it not enough.
But ya it's a huge coincidence, he was probably there.
i dunno if oj did it but hes lucky he got off
scott peterson is awaiting the needle rotting in pelican bay and the only evidence against him was a strand of hair on a pair of pliers on his boat
scott peterson is awaiting the needle rotting in pelican bay and the only evidence against him was a strand of hair on a pair of pliers on his boat
“The road was really well lit and I saw the driver clearly,” continued Shively, who said the incident occurred at 10:50 p.m. “It was O.J. I recognized him because I had just seen him in the movie Naked Gun 33 ½, and he had glared at me.”
Shively wrote down the now 68-year-old’s license plate as “3ZWZ788” — and it turned out she was only off by one letter. Simpson’s plate was actually “3CWZ788.”
Detectives later told Shively she had seen him “fleeing the killing scene.”
.....
Yeah maybe there was two people like he hinted to the writer of the book. That would explain the lack of weapon and blood.
Ronnie Lott
#49erGang
Based on what evidence
Scroll up but I'm guessing you don't agree.
seemorecizzy
Superstar
None of what u said proves he killed herI'm guessing you buy that the cops planted all the evidence..I don't. Them and the forensic team did a lot of dumb shyt that clearly proved they weren't geniuses capable of framing a millionaire star football player.
Before they even knew OJ didn't have an alibi they would have had to constructed this grand scheme which could have backfired. OJ could've been at a public event, out of town, anything.
No clear alibi and the first detectives didn't box him into one (fukked them up at trial)
DNA evidence including blood and hair (even if they claimed some evidence was contaminated in the lab that wouldn't have made it turn into OJ's)
Picture of him wearing the same shoes that they identified the murderer to have been wearing
Being suicidal afterwards when he's accused (the entire bronco chase not used in the case)
No concrete story on where the deep cut wound on his hand came from
Also that deep wound is on the same hand that the murderer left the leaking blood trail
The lady seeing him speeding from that direction and calling 911 reporting it before the news of the murder broke (Not included in the trial because she took TV money)
Receipts showing Nicole purchased the same gloves at the murder scenes for OJ (his manager admitted that he told OJ don't take his arthritis meds so the glove wouldn't fit if they tried it)
His limo driver getting there early, constantly buzzing in but no one seems to be home. Then he sees someone jumping over the gate and shortly later all of a sudden OJ comes to the door saying he overslept
It just proves that there's a Good chance he was at the crime scene during or after the killing
U nikkas clearly didn't watch made in America ...oj admited to Mike Gilbert his sports manager that he went over to Nicoles but he claims he killed in self-defence which Mike knew was a lie .. ...having said that I personally feel oj had help that night but not sure who off