Obama and Clinton brought Slavery to Libya

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,422
Reputation
5,272
Daps
115,931
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
:popcorn:

Go from state housing vouchers, free college education, stipend for every pregnancy, stable prosperous country with skyscrapers, high quality infrastructure.....building a giant man-made water pipeline system in the middle of the Sahara..helping other African countries with development......treating black Africans with respect, and even stemming the tide of migrants into Europe.....and then last (straw that broke camel's back) trying to create an African gold dinar currency system....

Go from all that to slave auction blocks, brought to you in part by a Democratic Liberal mulatto man and a white woman....and their cronies........:francis:.

Wonder why we look at BHO and HillRod apologist and bootlickers with :snoop: and :martin:

Granted Trump is so far all over the place....
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-185
Daps
65,119
Reppin
NULL
I've made numerous threads. Some have gone plat. But making threads doesn't make you a better contributor.

Either way, Obama nor Hillary are responsible for slavery. That responsibility lies with their government, their citizens, their police force, and the slave traders.

You have hundreds of these posts about Libya if not more. All I see is you doing the following in each of them:

  • critcise Obama for the death of Libyans.
  • Then give Gaddafi a pass for the murder and torture of Libyans.
  • Call anyone who disagrees with you an agent
  • Complain about us going to Libya
  • Say that's an issue for them to fix themselves
  • Then say we shouldn't have left it a mess for them to fix
  • Then complain when there was talk of going back.
  • Then complain we didn't do more
  • Repeat this cycle

You've been making the same post since at least 2013. Are you obsessed or are you the agent? :ohhh:

1. Hundreds of posts... false.

2. You joined in late 2016 and you know what i was posting about in 2013. Keep proving that you are a alias poster and a agent.

3. Obama, Clinton, McCain, Graham, Sarkozy and other leaders at fault but this isnt my article.

4. Can you provide proof M. G. tortured Libyans?

5. An agent is someone like yourself who constantly shows up attacking the op with ad hominems because the info isnt pro establishment or puts them in a bad light. Why protect them?

6. Libya wasnt a mess before until 2011 but ill let you cook.

7. US never fixes its fukk ups.

You made all agent responses and proves you cant debate the issue posted.
 

AndroidHero

Superstar
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
6,624
Reputation
1,230
Daps
39,195
Can you provide evidence?

Breh, Google Gaddafi and racism, there are plenty of evidence or better read what he said about Africans in his green book, the man was a racist opportunist, he treated native black Libyans horribly, and by that way the only reason he turned to Africa and African union was because Arabs rejected him and his vision for the Arab world, this romanticising of Gaddafi and his past has to stop,don't get me wrong I think the rebels who took over Libya are worse but to say that Gaddafi treated Africans with respect is just BS.

Ps: I'm not defending our actions in Libya, we shouldn't have intervened at all in that conflict, that was one of Obama's biggest mistakes.
 

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,497
Reputation
5,746
Daps
96,234
Again spending time on me and not addressing the topic. Typical.
The topic is retarded...

Its a pathetic attempt to shift blame for your beloved sand cac filth acting like the savages they are...

Yes Obama and Shillary destabilized Lybia but they did not bring back slavery...The demonic sand cac filth currently in charge are the ones who decided to enslave black migrants...
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,540
all i know is that the country is worse off now than it was before obama and whillary :yeshrug:

The problem is the idea of removing dictators to install democracy. Democracy doesn't exist without an educated, armed populace. All you do is open up a power vacuum for somebody else to come in. Americans have tried this with Iraq, Vietnam, Syria, Venezuela, Ecuador, Palestine, Haiti, etc etc etc. Dictators exist for a reason, the people let them come to power. If people were willing to die rather than live under a dictator, dictators wouldn't exist. Most people just really ain't 'bout that revolutionary job, they want to work and go home :yeshrug: All successful revolutions (e.g. Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, Mexico, Russia, France) came from within, not without. If you want to install democracy you can't just drop bombs, you need a 30 year stabilization plan, you gotta educate, arm the populace, be present for 3-4 elections, and then you can leave. But then again maybe what we want is the power vacuums, a lot of money in destabilization :yeshrug:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
106,651
Reputation
14,111
Daps
307,879
Reppin
NULL
The problem is the idea of removing dictators to install democracy. Democracy doesn't exist without an educated, armed populace. All you do is open up a power vacuum for somebody else to come in. Americans have tried this with Iraq, Vietnam, Syria, Venezuela, Ecuador, Palestine, Haiti, etc etc etc. Dictators exist for a reason, the people let them come to power. If people were willing to die rather than live under a dictator, dictators wouldn't exist. Most people just really ain't 'bout that revolutionary job, they want to work and go home :yeshrug: All successful revolutions (e.g. Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, Mexico, Russia, France) came from within, not without. If you want to install democracy you can't just drop bombs, you need a 30 year stabilization plan, you gotta educate, arm the populace, be present for 3-4 elections, and then you can leave. But then again maybe what we want is the power vacuums, a lot of money in destabilization :yeshrug:
not to mention this bullshyt about us caring about their democratic processes anyway :scustrump:

as if america would intervene in a foreign country because we cared about their populace going to voting booths :dead: our OWN democracy is a complete fukkin bought and paid for joke
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-185
Daps
65,119
Reppin
NULL
Breh, Google Gaddafi and racism, there are plenty of evidence or better read what he said about Africans in his green book, the man was a racist opportunist, he treated native black Libyans horribly, and by that way the only reason he turned to Africa and African union was because Arabs rejected him and his vision for the Arab world, this romanticising of Gaddafi and his past has to stop,don't get me wrong I think the rebels who took over Libya are worse but to say that Gaddafi treated Africans with respect is just BS.

Ps: I'm not defending our actions in Libya, we shouldn't have intervened at all in that conflict, that was one of Obama's biggest mistakes.

1. I asked you, not google. That means you got nothing but propaganda.

2. You provide nothing but agent talking points. Nothing more.

3. There was no conflict. This is why you are uninformed.
 
Top