Obama currently holding a town hall event speaking directly to black men Juelzing about Biden.
- Thread starter Voice of Reason
- Start date
HARLEM AL
Your broad loves me.....
They had no choice but the trot out this puppet after the 2008 Economic collapse. The elites might have been food if they didn't find something to distract the public with. They'll never be a real ADOS President in our lifetimes.Funny thing is i had just had an awakening during the last months of the Bush administration where i had come to the realization that it wasn't just George bush who had fukked the economy up but the govt as a whole dems and republicans workin in tandem to fukk over the american people....
then i got suckered in with one hell of a psyop ....
Just think how many would've went to jail if Eric Holder hadn't slow walked those prosecutions after Wall Street collapsed.
Eric Holder’s Longtime Excuse for Not Prosecuting Banks Just Crashed and Burned
Obama's $400,000 Wall Street speaking fee will undermine everything he believes in
Waterproof
Warrior Lifestyle
Can I make a prediction, Biden is going to win this election , I'm studying how this election going, I'm seeing how The Bedwench, c00ns, Negrocrats treating the Black Man, and I see how Heterosexual Black Male's Independent, Moderate Democrat and Moderate Republicans Black Males are really not buying either side.
Democrat's and Republicans see this, but Republicans know The Black Male always been Social Conservative MLK, Booker T Washington, Fredrick Douglas, Malcolm X but we don't fukk with no parties, we want Tangibles
So as I'm looking at the political field, The Democrat never put an ADOS on their ticket. Obama and Kamala ain't ADOS
The Black Male Vote is the biggest free agent prize, And The Blue Wave is going to sweep on election night the democrats going to pick up seats in the Senate
After this election the Republicans got a few young black senators
Watch how they going to go after the Black Male vote not only with Tangibles but putting one of their ADOS Black Senator on a ticket
They going to say The Party of Lincoln put an ADOS on the ticket for VP or even President
It's a Power Game going on and The Black ADOS Male finally have power to change elections and get Tangibles
Democrat's better get they head out their ass and do Right by us
Democrat's and Republicans see this, but Republicans know The Black Male always been Social Conservative MLK, Booker T Washington, Fredrick Douglas, Malcolm X but we don't fukk with no parties, we want Tangibles
So as I'm looking at the political field, The Democrat never put an ADOS on their ticket. Obama and Kamala ain't ADOS
The Black Male Vote is the biggest free agent prize, And The Blue Wave is going to sweep on election night the democrats going to pick up seats in the Senate
After this election the Republicans got a few young black senators
Watch how they going to go after the Black Male vote not only with Tangibles but putting one of their ADOS Black Senator on a ticket
They going to say The Party of Lincoln put an ADOS on the ticket for VP or even President
It's a Power Game going on and The Black ADOS Male finally have power to change elections and get Tangibles
Democrat's better get they head out their ass and do Right by us
Bunchy Carter
I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
12-21-16
Barack Obama explains why he doesn't think reparations to black people are practical
Breaking News
tags: reparations
An interview in the Atlantic with Ta-Nehisi Coates
Barack Obama: ... Theoretically, you can make, obviously, a powerful argument that centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination are the primary cause for all those gaps. That those were wrongs done to the black community as a whole, and black families specifically, and that in order to close that gap, a society has a moral obligation to make a large, aggressive investment, even if it’s not in the form of individual reparations checks, but in the form of a Marshall Plan, in order to close those gaps. It is easy to make that theoretical argument. But as a practical matter, it is hard to think of any society in human history in which a majority population has said that as a consequence of historic wrongs, we are now going to take a big chunk of the nation’s resources over a long period of time to make that right. You can look at examples like postwar Germany, where reparations were paid to Holocaust victims and families, but—
Coates: They lost the war.
Obama: They lost the war. Small population, finite amount of money that it was going to cost. Not multiple generations but people, in some cases, who are still alive, who can point to, “That was my house. Those were my paintings. Those were my mother’s family jewels.” If you look at countries like South Africa, where you had a black majority, there have been efforts to tax and help that black majority, but it hasn’t come in the form of a formal reparations program. You have countries like India that have tried to help untouchables, with essentially affirmative-action programs, but it hasn’t fundamentally changed the structure of their societies.
So the bottom line is that it’s hard to find a model in which you can practically administer and sustain political support for those kinds of efforts. And what makes America complicated as well is the degree to which this is not just a black/white society, and it is becoming less so every year. So how do Latinos feel if there’s a big investment just in the African American community, and they’re looking around and saying, “We’re poor as well. What kind of help are we getting?” Or Asian Americans who say, “Look, I’m a first-generation immigrant, and clearly I didn’t have anything to do with what was taking place.” And now you start getting into trying to calibrate—
Coates: Isn’t there just—not to cut you off—isn’t there, and this is out of the role of U.S. president, I’m almost speaking to you as a law professor now, an intellectual, in fact—
Obama: Well, that’s how I was answering the question, because if you want me to talk about politics, I’ll be much more blunt about it.
Coates: I figured that. I thought that was what I was getting.
Obama: I was giving the benefit of playing out, theoretically, how you could think about that.
Coates: And I appreciate that. And the question I would ask is in that situation, to the immigrant who comes here, first generation, and says, “I didn’t do any of this,” but the country is largely here because of that. In other words, many of the benefits that you will actually enjoy are, in fact, in part—I won’t say largely—in part here because of the past. So when you want the benefits, when you invoke the past, that thus you inherit the debt, too—
Obama: Yeah, yeah. I mean, I guess, here’s the way—probably the best way of saying it is that you can make a theoretical, abstract argument in favor of something like reparations. And maybe I’m just not being sufficiently optimistic or imaginative enough—
Coates: You’re supposed to be optimistic!
Obama: Well, I thought I was, but I’m not so optimistic as to think that you would ever be able to garner a majority of an American Congress that would make those kinds of investments above and beyond the kinds of investments that could be made in a progressive program for lifting up all people. So to restate it: I have much more confidence in my ability, or any president or any leader’s ability, to mobilize the American people around a multiyear, multibillion-dollar investment to help every child in poverty in this country than I am in being able to mobilize the country around providing a benefit specific to African Americans as a consequence of slavery and Jim Crow. Now, we can debate the justness of that. But I feel pretty confident in that assessment politically. And, you know, I think that part of my optimism comes from the belief that we as a people could actually, regardless of all the disadvantage of the past, regardless of the fact that a lot of other folks got a head start in the race, if we were able to make the race fair right now, and—...
via: Barack Obama explains why he doesn't think reparations to black people are practical | History News Network
Barack Obama explains why he doesn't think reparations to black people are practical
Breaking News
tags: reparations
An interview in the Atlantic with Ta-Nehisi Coates
Barack Obama: ... Theoretically, you can make, obviously, a powerful argument that centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination are the primary cause for all those gaps. That those were wrongs done to the black community as a whole, and black families specifically, and that in order to close that gap, a society has a moral obligation to make a large, aggressive investment, even if it’s not in the form of individual reparations checks, but in the form of a Marshall Plan, in order to close those gaps. It is easy to make that theoretical argument. But as a practical matter, it is hard to think of any society in human history in which a majority population has said that as a consequence of historic wrongs, we are now going to take a big chunk of the nation’s resources over a long period of time to make that right. You can look at examples like postwar Germany, where reparations were paid to Holocaust victims and families, but—
Coates: They lost the war.
Obama: They lost the war. Small population, finite amount of money that it was going to cost. Not multiple generations but people, in some cases, who are still alive, who can point to, “That was my house. Those were my paintings. Those were my mother’s family jewels.” If you look at countries like South Africa, where you had a black majority, there have been efforts to tax and help that black majority, but it hasn’t come in the form of a formal reparations program. You have countries like India that have tried to help untouchables, with essentially affirmative-action programs, but it hasn’t fundamentally changed the structure of their societies.
So the bottom line is that it’s hard to find a model in which you can practically administer and sustain political support for those kinds of efforts. And what makes America complicated as well is the degree to which this is not just a black/white society, and it is becoming less so every year. So how do Latinos feel if there’s a big investment just in the African American community, and they’re looking around and saying, “We’re poor as well. What kind of help are we getting?” Or Asian Americans who say, “Look, I’m a first-generation immigrant, and clearly I didn’t have anything to do with what was taking place.” And now you start getting into trying to calibrate—
Coates: Isn’t there just—not to cut you off—isn’t there, and this is out of the role of U.S. president, I’m almost speaking to you as a law professor now, an intellectual, in fact—
Obama: Well, that’s how I was answering the question, because if you want me to talk about politics, I’ll be much more blunt about it.
Coates: I figured that. I thought that was what I was getting.
Obama: I was giving the benefit of playing out, theoretically, how you could think about that.
Coates: And I appreciate that. And the question I would ask is in that situation, to the immigrant who comes here, first generation, and says, “I didn’t do any of this,” but the country is largely here because of that. In other words, many of the benefits that you will actually enjoy are, in fact, in part—I won’t say largely—in part here because of the past. So when you want the benefits, when you invoke the past, that thus you inherit the debt, too—
Obama: Yeah, yeah. I mean, I guess, here’s the way—probably the best way of saying it is that you can make a theoretical, abstract argument in favor of something like reparations. And maybe I’m just not being sufficiently optimistic or imaginative enough—
Coates: You’re supposed to be optimistic!
Obama: Well, I thought I was, but I’m not so optimistic as to think that you would ever be able to garner a majority of an American Congress that would make those kinds of investments above and beyond the kinds of investments that could be made in a progressive program for lifting up all people. So to restate it: I have much more confidence in my ability, or any president or any leader’s ability, to mobilize the American people around a multiyear, multibillion-dollar investment to help every child in poverty in this country than I am in being able to mobilize the country around providing a benefit specific to African Americans as a consequence of slavery and Jim Crow. Now, we can debate the justness of that. But I feel pretty confident in that assessment politically. And, you know, I think that part of my optimism comes from the belief that we as a people could actually, regardless of all the disadvantage of the past, regardless of the fact that a lot of other folks got a head start in the race, if we were able to make the race fair right now, and—...
via: Barack Obama explains why he doesn't think reparations to black people are practical | History News Network
same strategy as 2016
I actually think Hillary had more celebrity support, I remember Hov/B and The Obama’s jumping on the trail for her in the fourth
I think it’s going to be close and mirror the Bush/Gore 2000 election
You got that from that question! He said that are problems are acute and worst off but we can form allies to get what's done. How in the world did you get that from his answer?
dj-method-x
Superstar
All this sounds good and probably tickles your emotions but you would have been laughed out of a court room presenting any of the above as evidence. So try again
Waterproof
Warrior Lifestyle
If it's like 2000 election then it's a wrap, Trump is going to win he got the Supreme Court
It is. Same damn goofy, bytch ass clowns in EVERY DAMN THREAD in the Locker Room and NOT an ounce of smoke for Trump in any one of them. You know the roll call:
@TRY GOD
@Captain_Crunch
@gator_king
@Scott Larock
@*DalMem*
@Waterproof
@CASHAPP
@Cold Blooded
@Voice of Reason
@UpAndComing
@BigRemy_J
There's a few other clowns I'm forgetting right now but trust me they gonna show they little bucktoothed MAGAt asses in here soon and you'll spot them. They stink like a third world country dutty fish market so you'll spot them as soon as they post some trash up in a thread.
Last edited:
Born2BKing
Veteran
Now this is a post I was waiting to see. This explains a lot about the thinking of a lot of the no vote brehs. @G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman @neotheflyingone This is the end game for the Tariq mafia.
Last edited:
KillerB88
Superstar
Latinx's don't want reparations and aren't constantly harping about equality. They just want to get here.
Captain Crunch
Veteran
I don't nor have the majority of my ppl voted for Trump, I have every right to criticize the Dems when my ppl have supported them for years despite not getting shyt.
Using your logic, where's that energy for Biden's anti-black racism
Where was you at when Biden said race soldiers just need to shoot us in the leg?
Y'all Dem dikk eaters were mighty quiet when it's threads about Biden and Harris's fukk shyt. I wonder why
KillerB88
Superstar
No, I agree fully. That's what I'm saying. Handing the Dems our votes with nothing concrete in return will be our death knell.
Born2BKing
Veteran
No lies told. People don't like realistic talk though. One minute it's "all cacs are racist" and the next they expect those racist cacs to give us 17 trillion dollars.12-21-16
Barack Obama explains why he doesn't think reparations to black people are practical
Breaking News
tags: reparations
An interview in the Atlantic with Ta-Nehisi Coates
Barack Obama: ... Theoretically, you can make, obviously, a powerful argument that centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination are the primary cause for all those gaps. That those were wrongs done to the black community as a whole, and black families specifically, and that in order to close that gap, a society has a moral obligation to make a large, aggressive investment, even if it’s not in the form of individual reparations checks, but in the form of a Marshall Plan, in order to close those gaps. It is easy to make that theoretical argument. But as a practical matter, it is hard to think of any society in human history in which a majority population has said that as a consequence of historic wrongs, we are now going to take a big chunk of the nation’s resources over a long period of time to make that right. You can look at examples like postwar Germany, where reparations were paid to Holocaust victims and families, but—
Coates: They lost the war.
Obama: They lost the war. Small population, finite amount of money that it was going to cost. Not multiple generations but people, in some cases, who are still alive, who can point to, “That was my house. Those were my paintings. Those were my mother’s family jewels.” If you look at countries like South Africa, where you had a black majority, there have been efforts to tax and help that black majority, but it hasn’t come in the form of a formal reparations program. You have countries like India that have tried to help untouchables, with essentially affirmative-action programs, but it hasn’t fundamentally changed the structure of their societies.
So the bottom line is that it’s hard to find a model in which you can practically administer and sustain political support for those kinds of efforts. And what makes America complicated as well is the degree to which this is not just a black/white society, and it is becoming less so every year. So how do Latinos feel if there’s a big investment just in the African American community, and they’re looking around and saying, “We’re poor as well. What kind of help are we getting?” Or Asian Americans who say, “Look, I’m a first-generation immigrant, and clearly I didn’t have anything to do with what was taking place.” And now you start getting into trying to calibrate—
Coates: Isn’t there just—not to cut you off—isn’t there, and this is out of the role of U.S. president, I’m almost speaking to you as a law professor now, an intellectual, in fact—
Obama: Well, that’s how I was answering the question, because if you want me to talk about politics, I’ll be much more blunt about it.
Coates: I figured that. I thought that was what I was getting.
Obama: I was giving the benefit of playing out, theoretically, how you could think about that.
Coates: And I appreciate that. And the question I would ask is in that situation, to the immigrant who comes here, first generation, and says, “I didn’t do any of this,” but the country is largely here because of that. In other words, many of the benefits that you will actually enjoy are, in fact, in part—I won’t say largely—in part here because of the past. So when you want the benefits, when you invoke the past, that thus you inherit the debt, too—
Obama: Yeah, yeah. I mean, I guess, here’s the way—probably the best way of saying it is that you can make a theoretical, abstract argument in favor of something like reparations. And maybe I’m just not being sufficiently optimistic or imaginative enough—
Coates: You’re supposed to be optimistic!
Obama: Well, I thought I was, but I’m not so optimistic as to think that you would ever be able to garner a majority of an American Congress that would make those kinds of investments above and beyond the kinds of investments that could be made in a progressive program for lifting up all people. So to restate it: I have much more confidence in my ability, or any president or any leader’s ability, to mobilize the American people around a multiyear, multibillion-dollar investment to help every child in poverty in this country than I am in being able to mobilize the country around providing a benefit specific to African Americans as a consequence of slavery and Jim Crow. Now, we can debate the justness of that. But I feel pretty confident in that assessment politically. And, you know, I think that part of my optimism comes from the belief that we as a people could actually, regardless of all the disadvantage of the past, regardless of the fact that a lot of other folks got a head start in the race, if we were able to make the race fair right now, and—...
via: Barack Obama explains why he doesn't think reparations to black people are practical | History News Network
Last edited: