TPP isn't a trade deal. All of those countries in Asia will continue trading with China. Tariffs are already low with the US.
TPP is a corporate power play. On one hand, it gives multinational corporations, many of which are like nation-states in their own rights (I don’t think any have nuclear weapons yet, though), the right to sue democratic countries whose labor and pollution laws hurt their profit margins.
On the other hand, it sets up a security agreement in the Pacific to “counter China”, part of the neocon / neolib agenda to restart the Cold War – see the stationing of U.S. missiles in South Korea, very simliar to putting nukes in Turkey during the Cold War, a major factor in the Cuban Missile Crisis. This, like the Nuland project in eastern Europe, is highly destabilizing to world relations – but good news for the war pig profit margins.
There is plenty of evidence that these are the real TPP agendas:
Obama has provided further evidence that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) more closely resembles a scheme for international governance like the European Union rather than a traditional trade agreement.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-true-nature-of-the-trans-pacific-partnership
TPP and Big Pharma summarized in
this piece co-authored by Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz:
"The TPP would manage trade in pharmaceuticals through a variety of seemingly arcane rule changes on issues such as ‘patent linkage', ‘data exclusivity', and ‘biologics.' The upshot is that pharmaceutical companies would effectively be allowed to extend — sometimes almost indefinitely — their monopolies on patented medicines, keep cheaper generics off the market, and block ‘biosimilar' competitors from introducing new medicines for years."