Official 2020 Iowa Caucus Thread

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,063
Reputation
5,432
Daps
72,855
Even so, Massachusetts and Vermont not going to go Red as they are the candidates.
Remember when Ted Kennedy passed and then a Republican held his seat until Warren beat him? He was able to get concessions on Obamacare just being in that position. What if the Massachusetts governor tuns for that seat himself? That’s not a gimme.
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,744
Reputation
12,630
Daps
227,526
Remember when Ted Kennedy passed and then a Republican held his seat until Warren beat him? He was able to get concessions on Obamacare just being in that position. What if the Massachusetts governor tuns for that seat himself? That’s not a gimme.

I see.....
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,744
Reputation
12,630
Daps
227,526
he saying the governors would appoint republican senators once they have to leave those positions to assume executive positions

so mass and vermont would have interim republican senators until special elections are held

Yeah, I know they both would get the :ufdup: stern look if a Russian supporter of a GOP candidate took their seat.
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,923
Reputation
8,193
Daps
83,480
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
Remember when Ted Kennedy passed and then a Republican held his seat until Warren beat him? He was able to get concessions on Obamacare just being in that position. What if the Massachusetts governor tuns for that seat himself? That’s not a gimme.
that was because the republican candidate in the special election actually won in massachusetts though. scott brown wasnt a governor-appointee
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,063
Reputation
5,432
Daps
72,855
that was because the republican candidate in the special election actually won in massachusetts though. scott brown wasnt a governor-appointee
I’m aware. That’s why I said “expedited run-off.” Under MA law you have 145 days to have a run off election. The governor can appoint in the interim. You could have a scenario where Massachusetts has a Republican senator for a quarter of the year. Massachusetts would probably end up with Kennedy versus the governor in the Senate race.
 
Last edited:

duncanthetall

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
45,572
Reputation
4,551
Daps
150,891
Reppin
WHODEY/BIGBLUE/SNOWGANG/MIDNIGHTBOYZ
fukk it...change the rules, get dirty, the GOP does it with no regard! You can't win against people that ain't fighting fair

Something...anything :mjcry:

This is the shyt I was talking about before

The GOP has it's foot firmly planted in Kentucky's ass and they keep voting for them :wow:

They're near last in EVERYTHING brehs
.....yeah I know. I live in Kentucky :mjcry:
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,923
Reputation
8,193
Daps
83,480
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
I’m aware. That’s why I said “expedited run-off.” Massachusetts would probably end up with Kennedy versus the governor.
both brown and baker beat martha coakley who is one of the worst political candidates in the state's history. as long as shes not the nominee AGAIN i dont see a republican winning a Mass. senate election

massachusetts electorate is much more likely to vote for republicans in state elections than federal ones
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,954
Reputation
3,294
Daps
59,448
Reppin
NULL
The democrats need to just go ahead and forfeit the November elections. This is really aggravating.
 
Top