ORDER_66
I am The Wrench in all your plans....
The american govt does what AIPAC says bruh... entire govt been compromised...
they cut him a big check for what he did and everyone knows it...
Official Israel Vs. Iran 2025 thread: First post updates! US/Israel attacks set Iran back months at best. Ceasefire in effect. Everybody wins(?)
- Thread starter Afro
- Start date
The american govt does what AIPAC says bruh... entire govt been compromised...
they cut him a big check for what he did and everyone knows it...
IIVI
Superstar
Looks like we found the John McCain of term 2. I been rocking with dude for a minute back to 2022. Not saying he’s A1 on our side but he constantly votes against dumb shyt Republicans want to do.
@Seoul Gleou
@AnonymityX1000
@Leasy
It was in front of our faces this entire time.
EDIT: I don't agree with the bombing part of the title.
Just know that Israel has been in our faces this entire time.
@AnonymityX1000
@Leasy
It was in front of our faces this entire time.EDIT: I don't agree with the bombing part of the title.
Just know that Israel has been in our faces this entire time.
Last edited:
ORDER_66
I am The Wrench in all your plans....
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Nah that's too much of a leap there and they know it, that's why they cut the clip up like that. Would she bomb Iran? Maybe.. would she have gone about this the way Trump has? No. It would have taken sufficient evidence and an act of Congress for her to do so.
levitate
I love you, you know.
Raw.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
I don't know enough about him to say.
Not a fan of the video title, more about how no matter who it is, it's Israel, Israel, Israel.
Or "Iran is tomorrow away." from a nuke. "They are the enemy". Over and over again.
EDIT:
I can see why Netanyahu didn't pick Kamala. He's been ignoring them for a long minute now.
Probably thinks they were too soft. So Kamala would not have bombed Iran. And that is why she wasn't backed by Netanyahu/AIPAC.
Fair enough
Last edited:
https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-06-22-25-intl-hnk#cmc8ifg1v000c3b6na32m4eu2
16 min ago
President Donald Trump praised the impact of the US’ strikes on nuclear sites in Iran as early assessments raise questions over whether the US destroyed the bulk of the country’s enriched nuclear material.
“Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,” he wrote on Truth Social late Sunday night.
“Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!” he wrote on Truth Social.
The US attacked three key Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time. Trump claimed the operation “obliterated” the sites, but officials are still assessing how significant of a blow it dealt to Tehran’s program.
CNN reported Sunday that the US appears to have held back its most powerful bombs against one of the three facilities included in the operation, raising questions about whether it finished the job.
16 min ago
Trump says “obliteration” is accurate to describe Iran strikes despite uncertainty over damage
From CNN’s Alejandra JaramilloPresident Donald Trump praised the impact of the US’ strikes on nuclear sites in Iran as early assessments raise questions over whether the US destroyed the bulk of the country’s enriched nuclear material.
“Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,” he wrote on Truth Social late Sunday night.
“Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!” he wrote on Truth Social.
The US attacked three key Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time. Trump claimed the operation “obliterated” the sites, but officials are still assessing how significant of a blow it dealt to Tehran’s program.
CNN reported Sunday that the US appears to have held back its most powerful bombs against one of the three facilities included in the operation, raising questions about whether it finished the job.
Smalley Biggs
Pro
No one knows for sure if she would have bombed Iran or not and we never will. One thing we do know is that she is also controlled by the Israel lobby so more than likely the genocide would have continued and escalations with Iran would continue. I don't think she would have gone rouge without congress's approval.
For those that don't know, Obama, on his way out of office in Dec 2016, decided to give one final fukk you to Netanyahu. When the UN was voting on a resolution to halt to all illegal Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, instead of vetoing (like he was ordered to by the Israel lobby), Obama abstained.
So when Trump takes office in Jan 2017 with a republican house, one of the first resolutions the house passes is a resolution officially condemning Obama for abstaining. Guess who cosponsored that resolution to condemn Obama? Newly elected Senator Kamala Harris.
Now why in the world would a democratic senator side with Donald Trump and the Republican congress on condemning the leader of the Democratic party and one of the most popular presidents in history (at the time) over an issue of settlements that are clearly illegal? She serves the Israeli lobby just like most of our govt. Even Obama came out of AIPAC's stable of bytches. But he's the only one in recent memory that defied them in any significant way (The Iran deal).
ReturnOfJudah
Veteran
the cac mamba
Veteran
no one's getting draftedDamn
Choosing not to veto, Obama lets anti-settlement resolution pass at UN Security Council
In dramatic departure from eight years of policy, US abstains, enabling 14-0 vote; Israel accuses Obama, Kerry of abandoning it; Palestinians hail 'day of victory'
www.timesofisrael.com
