Official Israel Vs. Iran 2025 thread: First post updates! US/Israel attacks set Iran back months at best. Ceasefire in effect. Everybody wins(?)

StretfordRed

Afro-European
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
11,541
Reputation
-1,879
Daps
33,488
:mjlol:

Believe that ‘laws’ will protect you from white supremacy, Negropean brehs
But as someone even said, you’re Nigerian and not living in Nigeria? In Canada? Born there or immigrated? What are you even arguing about? Who even cares.
When did they drop a nuclear bomb? That would actually be "not rhetoric".
I cannot be bothered to go over it again. Honestly you’re arguing some elementary points. Just search uranium enrichment levels, 60-90% and what Iran possesses and not waste my time with silly questions.
"but they chant death to America" is the new "they hate us for our freedoms"

it's nonsensical and silly to claim chants or words are justifications to go to war.

"but they say America is the great Satan" yeah and George Bush said Iran was in the "axis of evil". Same shyt. They chant "death to America" and our leaders here in the U.S. sing "bomb iran"
Again, elementary level positioning here. US/Israel did not bomb Iran due to rhetoric alone.

I know most people will not read a book about it, let alone an hour long podcast with a nuclear scientist that I posted already in this thread.

So here is a simplified video:

My take is the intelligence was mid, but not completely incorrect. We already know u235 above 4.5% has already been reached by Iran which exceeds common civilian usage of it. Yes Trump did pull you guys out of the agreement and yes it takes mere weeks to go from 60% to weapons grade uranium. Is that a valid pretext to bombing Iran even though negotiations were close: no. But we do not know the true intentions of any nation when it comes to Iran.
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
492
Reputation
-5
Daps
1,098
Reppin
NULL
US/Israel did not bomb Iran due to rhetoric alone.
it's the reasoning many people give as to why Iran can't obtain a nuke, hence the reason why it was necessary bomb them to stop them (according to these people)

of course it/s not why the U.S. bombed Iran. Just like the U.S. didn't invade Iraq because "they hate us for our freedoms"

It's silly to even bring up the "death to America" chants when trying to justify war
 

Nkrumah Was Right

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,888
Reputation
1,979
Daps
34,513
But as someone even said, you’re Nigerian and not living in Nigeria? In Canada? Born there or immigrated? What are you even arguing about? Who even cares.

You do.
:mjlol:
Otherwise, you wouldn't be trying to convince black people on the Coli to support the West - the same civilization that enslaved their ancestors and placed their ancestors and them in a permanent state of inequality and structural racism.
 

StretfordRed

Afro-European
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
11,541
Reputation
-1,879
Daps
33,488
You do.
:mjlol:
Otherwise, you wouldn't be trying to convince black people on the Coli to support the West - the same civilization that enslaved their ancestors and placed their ancestors and them in a permanent state of inequality and structural racism.
I really do not care. Someone brought it up in an argument about Iran and Israel.

I am not trying to convince anyone, you and everyone is for their own free will. But I and a few others are at least trying to provide factual evidence to discussions, instead of parroting topics, through a lot of fake news tweets, in an echo chamber.
 

StretfordRed

Afro-European
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
11,541
Reputation
-1,879
Daps
33,488
it's the reasoning many people give as to why Iran can't obtain a nuke, hence the reason why it was necessary bomb them to stop them (according to these people)

of course it/s not why the U.S. bombed Iran. Just like the U.S. didn't invade Iraq because "they hate us for our freedoms"

It's silly to even bring up the "death to America" chants when trying to justify war
But you are aware Iran not only talks the talk, but also walks it by funding multiple terrorist groups across the Middle East, who have targeted Israel, US and other nations, right?

Or are we acting like Iran are completely innocent here.
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
492
Reputation
-5
Daps
1,098
Reppin
NULL
But you are aware Iran not only talks the talk, but also walks it by funding multiple terrorist groups across the Middle East, who have targeted Israel, US and other nations, right?

Or are we acting like Iran are completely innocent here.
Who funds the biggest terrorist group in the middle east (Israel) ? The U.S. does
Who funds the inventors of terrorism in the middle east (Zionists) ? The U.S. does
 

Nkrumah Was Right

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,888
Reputation
1,979
Daps
34,513
Btw, Zohran Mamdani has the Zionists fuming mad. I wonder what kind tricks they are planning to challenge him in the general election.

His victory is a leading indicator that people, especially young people are sick of Zionists.

They're going to run the Jeremy Corbyn playbook against him.

They're going to convince a Jewish staffer of his that there's serious culture of antisemitism in his campaign :mjlol:
 

Nkrumah Was Right

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,888
Reputation
1,979
Daps
34,513
I really do not care. Someone brought it up in an argument about Iran and Israel.

I am not trying to convince anyone, you and everyone is for their own free will. But I and a few others are at least trying to provide factual evidence to discussions, instead of parroting topics, through a lot of fake news tweets, in an echo chamber.

You haven't really brought any 'facts'.

Each time I describe how Israel has historically been the greatest threat to black people, far more so than Iran, you attempt to bob and weave (poorly).

This is the problem of the British people - they believe that since they're trained in rhetoric, that they can 'win' arguments. However, most of what they're saying isn't really substantive and so they end up looking silly in most arguments with non-British English speakers.

:francis:
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
492
Reputation
-5
Daps
1,098
Reppin
NULL
Well I guess it is just a terrorist stalemate, then.
I guess so. If the zionists hate terrorism so much maybe they shouldn't have invented it when they were immigrants in Palestine way before the creation of Israel and committing acts of terror on the regular. Bombing buses, markets, theaters, hotels. In other words, bombing places where civilians congregate. They are the inventors of modern day terrorism as we know it today. List of Irgun attacks - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,984
Reputation
3,814
Daps
76,396
Reppin
New York
But as someone even said, you’re Nigerian and not living in Nigeria? In Canada? Born there or immigrated? What are you even arguing about? Who even cares.

I cannot be bothered to go over it again. Honestly you’re arguing some elementary points. Just search uranium enrichment levels, 60-90% and what Iran possesses and not waste my time with silly questions.

Again, elementary level positioning here. US/Israel did not bomb Iran due to rhetoric alone.

I know most people will not read a book about it, let alone an hour long podcast with a nuclear scientist that I posted already in this thread.

So here is a simplified video:

My take is the intelligence was mid, but not completely incorrect. We already know u235 above 4.5% has already been reached by Iran which exceeds common civilian usage of it. Yes Trump did pull you guys out of the agreement and yes it takes mere weeks to go from 60% to weapons grade uranium. Is that a valid pretext to bombing Iran even though negotiations were close: no. But we do not know the true intentions of any nation when it comes to Iran.

You don't know the difference between rhetoric and actions but I'm silly? Just say you like pre-emptive strikes especially against darkies and be done with it.
 

StretfordRed

Afro-European
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
11,541
Reputation
-1,879
Daps
33,488
You don't know the difference between rhetoric and actions but I'm silly? Just say you like pre-emptive strikes especially against darkies and be done with it.
It is not rhetoric if they already have enriched uranium to an excessive amount past civilian usage. The preemptive strikes was about intelligence we do not know about for obvious reasons.

But on this SPECIFIC case I would, and do take Israeli intelligence as medium-confidence at least mostly because of the multiple incursions into the Iranian nuclear project: Mossad infiltration of Iranian nuclear archive - Wikipedia
 
Top