Official Israel Vs. Iran 2025 thread: Updates on first post! Trump - "Make Iran Great Again!". Iran launched missiles at Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

summwunn

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,263
Reputation
603
Daps
4,442


FD-Sauce-Bottle1-20oz-SweetZesty-1.jpg
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
193,341
Reputation
25,271
Daps
623,917
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
@Seoul Gleou
@AnonymityX1000
@Leasy

:snoop:It was in front of our faces this entire time.




Nah that's too much of a leap there and they know it, that's why they cut the clip up like that. Would she bomb Iran? Maybe.. would she have gone about this the way Trump has? No. It would have taken sufficient evidence and an act of Congress for her to do so.
 

Afro

Student of life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
13,889
Reputation
6,937
Daps
55,340
Nah that's too much of a leap there and they know it, that's why they cut the clip up like that. Would she bomb Iran? Maybe.. would she have gone about this the way Trump has? No. It would have taken sufficient evidence and an act of Congress for her to do so.
Not a fan of the video title, more about how no matter who it is, it's Israel, Israel, Israel.
Or "Iran is tomorrow away." from a nuke. "They are the enemy". Over and over again.

EDIT:

I can see why Netanyahu didn't pick Kamala. He's been ignoring them for a long minute now.

Probably thinks they were too soft. So Kamala would not have bombed Iran. And that is why she wasn't backed by Netanyahu/AIPAC.

Fair enough :hubie:



 
Last edited:

Afro

Student of life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
13,889
Reputation
6,937
Daps
55,340
https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-06-22-25-intl-hnk#cmc8ifg1v000c3b6na32m4eu2

16 min ago

Trump says “obliteration” is accurate to describe Iran strikes despite uncertainty over damage

From CNN’s Alejandra Jaramillo
President Donald Trump praised the impact of the US’ strikes on nuclear sites in Iran as early assessments raise questions over whether the US destroyed the bulk of the country’s enriched nuclear material.

“Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,” he wrote on Truth Social late Sunday night.

“Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!” he wrote on Truth Social.

The US attacked three key Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time. Trump claimed the operation “obliterated” the sites, but officials are still assessing how significant of a blow it dealt to Tehran’s program.

CNN reported Sunday that the US appears to have held back its most powerful bombs against one of the three facilities included in the operation, raising questions about whether it finished the job.
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
416
Reputation
-20
Daps
815
Reppin
NULL
@Seoul Gleou
@AnonymityX1000
@Leasy

:snoop:It was in front of our faces this entire time.



No one knows for sure if she would have bombed Iran or not and we never will. One thing we do know is that she is also controlled by the Israel lobby so more than likely the genocide would have continued and escalations with Iran would continue. I don't think she would have gone rouge without congress's approval.

For those that don't know, Obama, on his way out of office in Dec 2016, decided to give one final fukk you to Netanyahu. When the UN was voting on a resolution to halt to all illegal Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, instead of vetoing (like he was ordered to by the Israel lobby), Obama abstained.

So when Trump takes office in Jan 2017 with a republican house, one of the first resolutions the house passes is a resolution officially condemning Obama for abstaining. Guess who cosponsored that resolution to condemn Obama? Newly elected Senator Kamala Harris.

Now why in the world would a democratic senator side with Donald Trump and the Republican congress on condemning the leader of the Democratic party and one of the most popular presidents in history (at the time) over an issue of settlements that are clearly illegal? She serves the Israeli lobby just like most of our govt. Even Obama came out of AIPAC's stable of bytches. But he's the only one in recent memory that defied them in any significant way (The Iran deal).
 

Afro

Student of life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
13,889
Reputation
6,937
Daps
55,340
No one knows for sure if she would have bombed Iran or not and we never will. One thing we do know is that she is also controlled by the Israel lobby so more than likely the genocide would have continued and escalations with Iran would continue. I don't think she would have gone rouge without congress's approval.

For those that don't know, Obama, on his way out of office in Dec 2016, decided to give one final fukk you to Netanyahu. When the UN was voting on a resolution to halt to all illegal Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, instead of vetoing (like he was ordered to by the Israel lobby), Obama abstained.

So when Trump takes office in Jan 2017 with a republican house, one of the first resolutions the house passes is a resolution officially condemning Obama for abstaining. Guess who cosponsored that resolution to condemn Obama? Newly elected Senator Kamala Harris.

Now why in the world would a democratic senator side with Donald Trump and the Republican congress on condemning the leader of the Democratic party and one of the most popular presidents in history (at the time) over an issue of settlements that are clearly illegal? She serves the Israeli lobby just like most of our govt. Even Obama came out of AIPAC's stable of bytches. But he's the only one in recent memory that defied them in any significant way (The Iran deal).

Damn :ohhh:

 

Afro

Student of life
Supporter
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
13,889
Reputation
6,937
Daps
55,340
https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-06-22-25-intl-hnk#cmc8i3c1t00003b6n60gvsg3h


11 min ago

Iran’s Supreme Leader faces “most dire situation” of his rule, analyst says​

From CNN's Rhea Mogul
Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei faces the greatest challenge yet to his leadership following US strikes on his country’s nuclear sites, an analyst said, as the world awaits an official response from the Supreme Leader.

Khamenei is arguably in the “most dire situation of his entire life as an autocrat,” Karim Sadjadpour, from the Carnegie Endowment of International Peace, told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins.

“He’s in a bunker. He’s 86 years old. He has limited physical, cognitive bandwidth. Most of his top military commanders were assassinated. He doesn’t control his own airspace. Israel controls it,” he said. “And, you know, there’s no way out of this war. He can’t win this war. He’s outmatched militarily, financially, technologically.”

Khamenei has not yet publicly commented since the US struck three key Iranian nuclear sites. He said last week in a national address that Iran will not surrender and warned that any US military intervention would result in “irreparable damage.”

After reportedly rejecting an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei, US President Trump stated last week that Iran’s Supreme Leader is an “easy target.”

Questions are mounting over whether such an intervention could trigger regime change in Tehran – an outcome that risks splintering the country and sending shockwaves across the region.

Khamenei has ruled Iran for more than 35 years as its highest authority, rising to power a decade after the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew a US-backed monarch.

The Supreme Leader “has survival instincts, but he also has defiant instincts,” Sadjadpour said. “And he’s having a real struggle in my view, reconciling those two.”
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
14,676
Reputation
10,437
Daps
92,953
Reppin
McDowell's
@Seoul Gleou
@AnonymityX1000
@Leasy

:snoop:It was in front of our faces this entire time.

EDIT: I don't agree with the bombing part of the title.

Just know that Israel has been in our faces this entire time.



Her and Joe are exactly the same on this. She was given many, many chances to put daylight between herself and Biden and chose not to every time.

If people really think she would've put up more resistance to Mossad and the Israelis than Trump, they're high or dumb. Both Republicans and Democrats are compromised by Israel.
 
Top