***Official March Madness 2K17 Thread***

DarrynCobretti

Fresh out the bed, count up the dead
Supporter
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,411
Reputation
4,060
Daps
26,006
Reppin
All this drip on me
UNC vs Duke resume and head to head records looking funny in the light for UNC. Even the analysts calling that out. UNC tied the most losses ever for a 1 as well.

Kentucky got screwed as 2 seed too, no way Kentucky should've got that difficult of a path.
 

funkee

All Star
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,000
Reputation
280
Daps
7,567
Reppin
Houston, TX
8 losses. :ld:

bad losses only matter as much for teams on the bubble. when you're trying to separate the top teams, quality wins is what matters more and duke has more than anyone else in the nation and beat UNC head to head twice out of 3 games. shyt is crazy. they move the goalposts every year.
 

charknicks

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,374
Reputation
426
Daps
11,762
bad losses only matter as much for teams on the bubble. when you're trying to separate the top teams, quality wins is what matters more and duke has more than anyone else in the nation and beat UNC head to head twice out of 3 games. shyt is crazy. they move the goalposts every year.

Man, they were ranked #15 or so before these conference tournaments. The regular season matters. UNC WON the best conference in the nation by 2 games. Chill out.

Duke got a light road as a 2 seed. SMU will be tough. Just enjoy the tourney at this point
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,652
Reputation
10,202
Daps
218,163
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
UNC vs Duke resume and head to head records looking funny in the light for UNC. Even the analysts calling that out. UNC tied the most losses ever for a 1 as well.

Kentucky got screwed as 2 seed too, no way Kentucky should've got that difficult of a path.
Had Duke gotten the #1 seed they would have set the record for most L's for a 1 seed
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,806
Reputation
5,930
Daps
163,032
Reppin
PG x MD
this committee guy is full of shyt...how did duke start the week only as a 4 seed?
They were ranked 13 and finished like 5 in their conference what seed were they supposed to be?

nikka what are you even arguing. There's no logical reason Duke would have been a 1 seed prior to the ACC tourney. And winning your conference tourney does not auto make you a 1 seed.
 

funkee

All Star
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,000
Reputation
280
Daps
7,567
Reppin
Houston, TX
did this idiot Mark Hollis say duke didn't have any great wins prior to the conference tourney? this process is broken as fukk. they started the week in their mind with who the 1 seeds are and didn't look at anything deeper than the surface of conference wins and losses.
 

funkee

All Star
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,000
Reputation
280
Daps
7,567
Reppin
Houston, TX
How the fukk did Michigan St. make the tourney?

you a UNC fan, so by default I hate ya guts, but this was glaring as well.

They were ranked 13 and finished like 5 in their conference what seed were they supposed to be?

my biggest issue is that they basically ignored the conference tourneys save for the automatic bids from smaller conference. anyone who watched the games/uses eye test can see that duke should be above UNC. Them you compare them on paper and it becomes mroe obvious. Hell, UK should be above UNC as well.
 

DarrynCobretti

Fresh out the bed, count up the dead
Supporter
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,411
Reputation
4,060
Daps
26,006
Reppin
All this drip on me
8 losses. :ld:
So explain that how according to what the NCAA committee reps said.

UNC had 7 losses won the ACC reg season with a weaker SOS
Duke had 8 losses won the ACC championship and beat UNC 2 out of 3 times and had a stronger SOS


Yet UNC is 1 seed over Kentucky and Duke who both beat UNC on neutral courts and over Arizona who has less losses than UNC and unlike UNC won their conference tournament Championship.
 
Top