Triipe
All Star
from an Economist and a haaretz articleIn Assad's Syria, there is no religious coercion and minorities were not required to pay a jiziya tax because they weren't Sunni Muslims.
Homs, like all of the cities recaptured by the government, now belongs mostly to Syria’s victorious minorities: Christians, Shias and Alawites (an esoteric offshoot of Shia Islam from which Mr Assad hails). These groups banded together against the rebels, who are nearly all Sunni, and chased them out of the cities. Sunni civilians, once a large majority, followed. More than half of the country’s population of 22m has been displaced—6.5m inside Syria and over 6m abroad. Most are Sunnis.
The whole goal of unseating assad would have been to balkanize the region along ethnic/religious lines.
This outcome means Syria hasn't become a Sunni monolith and will continue to be a place where people can practice their religions in "peace"

Kurdish suppression has always had an ethnic reason behind it rather than a religious one. You do know that Kobanî is officially called Ayn Al Arab despite having a population consisting of nearly nothing but Kurds, and that you could get indefinitely detained in Syria pre-war for speaking Kurdish, right?
fair enough, but after Saddam and Gaddafi I get the feeling that the removal of Assad would have just led to further looting and destruction of Syria. 
I'm not defending Assad, just saying that if the opposition was any better he most likely would've lost the war. For us, there is little difference but for those minorities the takfiris want to slaughter, it's a matter of life or death.
Its only a matter of time before their brutal suppression of the majority of the country will lead to another war.