Thanks for being the moral authority on who the good guys are you loud clown ass little fukking dweeb. They should've left you in your middle school locker you insufferable bytch
Iran thanks you for your hard work.

Thanks for being the moral authority on who the good guys are you loud clown ass little fukking dweeb. They should've left you in your middle school locker you insufferable bytch
Nice what aboutisms you low hanging fruit grabbing mental midget. Wanna go tit for tat with each sides contributions to inhumanity and put a tally on it at the end? You have the proverbial penis of Zionism hanging out of your mouth right now and fail to understand why we all point and laugh at you.Iran thanks you for your hard work.
![]()
@King Kreole supports the Shia crescent and islamist imperialist death cults funded by the IRGC through africa, the balkans and latin america.
Man just shut up.My morality is predicated on eliminating this global threat and supporting coincidental allies and elements that achieve that.
Again, you’re free to develop a coherent and competent defense of the Ayatollah if you’d like.
![]()
Man just shut up.
This seems like some erotic fantasy you have.Nice what aboutisms you low hanging fruit grabbing mental midget. Wanna go tit for tat with each sides contributions to inhumanity and put a tally on it at the end? You have the proverbial penis of Zionism hanging out of your mouth right now and fail to understand why we all point and laugh at you.
Right. Whats so hard about saying this?Free Iran
![]()
These are good questions, but I think American hegemony is built on the proliferation of war, so I don't think those two positions are mutually exclusive. I think Tucker - like a growing number of right-wing youth, which are his primary audience - was "radicalized" by the complete fukkup boondoggle of the GWOT, so he's skeptical of Deep State neocon foreign policy. I haven't followed his musings on the Russia-Ukraine war too closely, but if I recall correctly his angle there is that Ukraine is basically a proxy state for Western/American interests, so the war with Russia is bad because Russia isn't going to back down, so it's just another quagmire with high potential for escalation due to Russia being a nuclear state. IMO that position gives him enough cover to maintain a claim of being anti-war, but he did that bullshyt softball interview with Putin and refuses to be truthful and call out Russia's immoral and illegal actions. Which is all the more reason why he shouldn't be propped up by the Democrats as a trusted messenger.Is he anti war or anti American hegemony?
I think this is a very important distinction.
Has he ever spoken out against Russia for attacking Ukraine?
I do however remember him going to a Russian grocery store just to glaze how great the country is and shyt on American grocers in comparison
oh this is why you support Iran.These are good questions, but I think American hegemony is built on the proliferation of war, so I don't think those two positions are mutually exclusive. I think Tucker - like a growing number of right-wing youth, which are his primary audience - was "radicalized" by the complete fukkup boondoggle of the GWOT, so he's skeptical of Deep State neocon foreign policy. I haven't followed his musings on the Russia-Ukraine war too closely, but if I recall correctly his angle there is that Ukraine is basically a proxy state for Western/American interests, so the war with Russia is bad because Russia isn't going to back down, so it's just another quagmire with high potential for escalation due to Russia being a nuclear state. IMO that position gives him enough cover to maintain a claim of being anti-war, but he did that bullshyt softball interview with Putin and refuses to be truthful and call out Russia's immoral and illegal actions. Which is all the more reason why he shouldn't be propped up by the Democrats as a trusted messenger.