Official War With Iran Thread

Loose

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
49,213
Reputation
2,933
Daps
142,707
Outlaw said:
MTG, Matt Gaetz and Tucker Carlson are not Republican leadership. I gave you a one to one analog of who is speaking out from the Democrat side but yet that doesn’t count?
Click to expand...
The people you listed have been speaking out against Israel for years, you’re proving Tommy's point
 
O

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
7,671
Reputation
389
Daps
23,369
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Loose said:
The people you listed have been speaking out against Israel for years, you’re proving Tommy's point
Click to expand...
No I’m rebuking his point. He’s giving Republicans undue credit for doing the bare minimum, things that democrat adjacent pundits and politicians have been doing for years. Let me know when Republican leadership start speaking out
 
Loose

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
49,213
Reputation
2,933
Daps
142,707
Outlaw said:
No I’m rebuking his point. He’s giving Republicans undue credit for doing the bare minimum,
Click to expand...

Republicans are the pro war party, hes not giving them credit hes pointing out how embarrassing that the democrats are being out flanked by the republicans on war
 
choc_cardigan

choc_cardigan

Squad
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
8,381
Reputation
1,029
Daps
26,232
Reppin
Philadelphia
Outlaw said:
Here’s a question:

Why does Tucker Carlson, Matt Gaetz and MTG get more credit than Bernie Sanders, Sam Seder, Kyle Kulinski and AOC?

People left of center have been anti war way longer than the fascists getting glazed that have all of a sudden found moral courage


People who support or are democrats have been speaking out since day one but get no credit
Click to expand...
It's already been established that he's either getting paid to shyt post, trying to farm engagement or has been radicalized by being on the Internet too much. Better question is why do you keep arguing with him?
 
D

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,350
Reputation
10,750
Daps
194,114
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
Pressure

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,199
Reputation
7,216
Daps
150,099
Reppin
CookoutGang
Liu Kang said:
I agree that proliferation is bad but so far the only country that has been willing to use nukes is the US... and they may do it again on Iran, so unironically, the US is the country that just elected somebody willing to use them.
Click to expand...
This is a narrative we need to stop. We all are aware of the arms race that led up the using dropping the atomic bombs.

Despite its destruction it ended a war that had for more casualties and usher in the l9ngedt period of sustained peace in modern history.

Yes, it was an arrogant show of power that led to the loss of lives. Objectively killing 200k people mostly civilians is an atrocity. But we're talking about 200k out of the 85 million people who died in ww2.

And we should always note that it hasn't been used since.

Liu Kang said:
When Russia threatened to use them in Ukraine, Biden's response was not to nuke them back, it was to destroy every launching facilities in Russia because the point of having nukes is not to use them, it's supposed to act as deterrent.
Click to expand...
Doesn't this strengthen my point. More nukes means a higher chance of nukes being used?

Liu Kang said:
am not saying South Korea or Saudi Arabia (or Iran) SHOULD have nukes. I'm saying that any country watching the current events and that has hostile countries around can only come to the conclusion that nukes is the best tool to protect your sovereignity if you have the GDP to build the program.
Click to expand...
From my perspective it seems that countries fighting hard to get nukes end up doing more harm to their citizens than good.

North Korea.
Iran.
Iraq.

:manny:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top