Official War With Iran Thread

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,992
Reputation
-34,126
Daps
632,963
Reppin
The Deep State
He's literally on the same path

Committed a genocide in Gaza
Blew up thousands of civilians throughout the middle east with his pager attack
Did a direct attack on iran that iran showed restraint at the time.
Took over portions of the golans heights.

He's been on a unhinged terror for about 5 years now.
Who funded Hamas?

Where were the leaders of Hamas living?


Screenshot-2025-06-22-at-12-07-32.png
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,433
Reputation
4,548
Daps
44,703
This isn’t an interview question, you don’t have to turn a negative into a positive, what do you think your legit blindspots are?

There’s a reason that posters you consider “good” get triggered by your takes when it comes to the populist right on the occasional basis
I was being earnest. I have relatively radical anti-imperialist and anti-colonialist politics that can blind me to seeing the good in warmongers and the American Empire. This is why I take a harsher stance on the Republican Party than most, and why I don’t have a neutered critique of the Democratic Party. It is a legitimate blind spot that has occasionally led me to become too credulous in my support of candidates who have any sort of anti-war potential, most recently example being my stanning of Kamala's campaign because she gave super vague signals early on that she would be a change to the status quo of American warmongering.

Good posters can disagree (in fact, that's the basis of good discourse). I'm by no means above reproach. All I ask is for the disagreement to be well-reasoned and in good-faith.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,433
Reputation
4,548
Daps
44,703
Everything you said in your response, misses the point that I believe @Liu Kang and I were attempting to make.

If you want to criticise Hakeem or Chuck for their response to this crisis, that's fine.

There are folks here however, who immediately pivoted to Biden and Kamala, which in my opinion is utter nonsense.
I'm glad you think it's fine to criticize Democratic leadership for their response to this crisis. But there are many here who don't.

As for the immediate pivot, I personally didn't see anyone do that. My recollection of the immediate aftermath of the strikes was people unanimously condemning Trump. But where we perhaps disagree is in the utility of staying on the topic of condemning Trump vs also looking towards the opposition party who allegedly represents us to see what they're saying and doing.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,992
Reputation
-34,126
Daps
632,963
Reppin
The Deep State
I'm glad you think it's fine to criticize Democratic leadership for their response to this crisis. But there are many here who don't.

As for the immediate pivot, I personally didn't see anyone do that. My recollection of the immediate aftermath of the strikes was people unanimously condemning Trump. But where we perhaps disagree is in the utility of staying on the topic of condemning Trump vs also looking towards the opposition party who allegedly represents us to see what they're saying and doing.
Today is tough for those who didn’t expect there to be consequences to what Iran is doing
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
49,261
Reputation
2,933
Daps
142,802
Who funded Hamas?

"A failed aggressor is still the aggressor."


GuD-isRXcAA4XJL

:wow:

Bio

former speechwriter for President George W. Bush. He is a senior editor at The Atlantic as well as an MSNBC contributor. In 2003, Frum authored the first book about Bush's presidency written by a former member of the administration.[4] He has taken credit for the famous phrase "axis of evil" in Bush's 2002 State of the Union address. He is considered a voice in the neoconservative movement.

:skip: you not beating those allegations
 

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,973
Reputation
5,544
Daps
30,667
Everyone here is first and foremost denouncing Trump for these strikes. In fact, the only people who aren't are the people who have refused to criticize the Democratic establishment like Nap and @voiture, because they are servile to American empire. If you're seeing other people make posts that are inaccurate or immoral you should point them out.

I think both of you are good, reasonable posters, but I take issue with what you're doing in these posts because you're (inadvertently, I presume) advocating for the learned helplessness that plagues the opposition to American fascism. There's absolutely nothing anyone here can do to influence the Republican/MAGA decision making apparatus. I don't think anyone here is a registered Republican, I don't think anyone here voted for Trump in the last election. This is a Democrat/Left-leaning subforum, not NBC News' editorial board group chat. So it makes complete sense to also spend our time discussing and lobbying for a suitable reaction from the political party that claims to represent us and is the official opposition force to Trump.

I agree that it's necessary to accurately assess responsibility and blame for these strikes on the people who are actually committing them, which is Trump and the Republican party in control of government, but you turn it into a circle-jerk when you start saying we cannot also discuss the actions and desires of the only entity that has a chance at taking power away from them. There's diminishing utility to having the whole thread be "bad man do bad thing". We don't have to have goldfish memory here. There was a long chain of actions that led us to this point, and many of those actions were done by Democrats as well. If we're to escape from this path of bad bipartisan foreign policy, we can't ban criticism of the Democratic Party. Discussing the history and hypotheticals of where Biden/Kamala/Democratic policy has failed is actually necessary to making sure we reverse course.
I have no problem with the criticism of Dem leadership, you can even find some in my posting history and I'm not even American. The sub is indeed sometimes circle jerky but we shouldn't fall in constant relativism either.

My issue with the Kamala/Biden hypotheticals is how can you say what they would have done if they didn't do it when they could ? Cricizing for their handling of Gaza, Lebanon or Yemen, sure. But Iran ?

Analyzing the causes that led to today is fine but realistically all major escalations were done by Trump (and Israel... and also Iran not being truthful on its nuclear program):dwillhuh:
- JCPOA unilateral exit (blindsiding Euros and Iran)
- IRGC put on the terrorist org list
- Soleimani assassination
- Israel's strike on the Iranian embassy in Damascus (without US approval, stated by both Israeli and US !)
- Rising Lion and decimation of IRGC chain of command
- The bombing on Fordow

Please tell me which action Obama or Biden took that is even remotely close to that because there is a solid track record of Ds doing everything they can NOT to have military action there so much that Nap has always hated Ds handling of Iran and he's likely on their payroll lol

- Obama signing of the JCPOA
- Several rounds of (failed) negotiations from 2021 to 2024 after the JCPAO exit made further agreements harder
- The prisonner exchanges in 2023 despite the Iranian plans to assassinate Pompeo
- It took France and English pressure for the US to back the IAEA resolution of last year's june 5th and Macron was telling Biden was stalling it

Once again, I'm fine with criticizing Ds but the chain of events bringing us to Rising Lion and Fordow bombing is absolutely not on them this time.

Obama put the West/Iran on the right path with JCPAO, it was not perfect but it was good enough as a start and should have led to continued efforts to improve it.

The current situations (including Ukraine) can even be argued to be a direct domino effect off Trump pulling out of JCPAO :
- It prevented Euros to negotiate with Iran because they were too scared of US sanctions if they did business
- It made Euros irrelevant in the grand scheme of things and gave Putin the evidence he needed that Euros were US lapdogs
- It put Iran's back against the wall, isolating it furthermore in the ME (it was at odds with Saudi Arabia already since 2016) and the world and it led to more and more sanctions on its economy
- Iran was basically pushed into Russia's arms (not that it needed that push but still, giving them options is always best)
- With an economy in ruins, Iranian officers became more easy to bribe which Mossad used to their advantage to Rising Lion's sucess

Obviously, not everything was that simple but this move created a rift that was totally unnecessary.
 
Top