Official War With Iran Thread

voiture

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,867
Reputation
193
Daps
15,791
The launchers are running on fumes unless they are saving the best for last?
Israel claims almost 50% of Iranian ballistic missiles launchers are destroyed.


 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,407
Reputation
4,548
Daps
44,639
When was the last time you saw democrat aligned media get in a democrat's ass the way Tucker fukking Carlson did to Ted Cruz over his warhawk bullshyt?


hzWr5Tm.gif
 

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,965
Reputation
5,544
Daps
30,618
Iran and Hamas are jokes. :dead: How do you talk so much shyt stir up so much trouble then get sonned to oblivion in a few days.:mjlol:
They overestimated the value of the hostages IMO

They thought it would be a Gilad Shalit situation x100 and that Netanyahu would fold but it's now obvious they didn't expect him to go respond hard. The disregard Bibi has had for its own hostages with how much he bombed Gaza was clearly not expected.

I think the fact most casualties/hostages of Oct 7th were civilians played a huge part in how hard Netanyahu reacted. I'm of the opinion that if they had solely taken/killed military/reservists, things would have played way differently.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,574
Reputation
-34,107
Daps
632,763
Reppin
The Deep State
When was the last time you saw democrat aligned media get in a democrat's ass the way Tucker fukking Carlson did to Ted Cruz over his warhawk bullshyt?
Are you against war or are you against stopping Iran’s nuclear program?

or do you support Iran having a nuclear program?

Or do you not care?

I’m just curious what you define as being a Warhawk.
 

Spidey Man

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
10,635
Reputation
1,315
Daps
31,595
Reppin
NULL
When was the last time you saw democrat aligned media get in a democrat's ass the way Tucker fukking Carlson did to Ted Cruz over his warhawk bullshyt?

This don't count. Putin asset is just doing what Putin wants.

I don't want war either, but let's not act like Tucker is a real journalist or is doing this for the greater good
 

horizon

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
14,741
Reputation
7,066
Daps
68,372
Are you against war or are you against stopping Iran’s nuclear program?

or do you support Iran having a nuclear program?

Or do you not care?

I’m just curious what you define as being a Warhawk.
I think the only nation to actually drop a nuke on someone shouldn't be dictating who can and can't have nukes. I think that when a country is accused of having nukes, the best thing they can do at that point is actually develop nukes before they get bombed. No one is coming for North Korea because deterrence keeps them away.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,574
Reputation
-34,107
Daps
632,763
Reppin
The Deep State
I think the only nation to actually drop a nuke on someone shouldn't be dictating who can and can't have nukes. I think that when a country is accused of having nukes, the best thing they can do at that point is actually develop nukes before they get bombed. No one is coming for North Korea because deterrence keeps them away.
Do you support Iran having nuclear weapons or would you want them to change their government and leadership first? Do you have an opinion on the country and its leaders and goals?
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
76,813
Reputation
9,265
Daps
230,239
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Sounds like the airstrikes on Iran did some heavy damage last night. Some are saying Iran is waiting to see if the U.S. will join the war before making their next move. If Iran is actually out of launchers then they are a sitting duck.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,407
Reputation
4,548
Daps
44,639
They overestimated the value of the hostages IMO

They thought it would be a Gilad Shalit situation x100 and that Netanyahu would fold but it's now obvious they didn't expect him to go respond hard. The disregard Bibi has had for its own hostages with how much he bombed Gaza was clearly not expected.

I think the fact most casualties/hostages of Oct 7th were civilians played a huge part in how hard Netanyahu reacted. I'm of the opinion that if they had solely taken/killed military/reservists, things would have played way differently.
I think the current reporting is that Hamas expected much more resistance from the Israeli forces once Operation Al Aqsa Flood had started, and the situation on the ground broke out into disorder with many non-Hamas individuals/forces joining the fray leading to breakdown of order. But I don't think went into the operation with the goal of a large scale hostage exchange based on Israeli largesse, they were trying to disrupt the burgeoning regional consensus of normalization with the Israeli state. In this way, Netanyahu going so hard bolstered their case and cause.

As for the Israeli response, I think the relatively high level of civilian casualties/hostages only gave Israel the opening to do what they've always sought to do; eradicate the Palestinians. I agree that it might have played out differently if Hamas had more operational control over the Palestinian forces engaged on October 7th and the result was a limiting of the targets to the Israeli military, but only because that would have robbed Israel of the cover of bloodlust vegenace that convinced the US and Western nations to allow them to move ahead with the genocide. This is why they mainstream Western media was complicit in this genocide; they guilelessly laundered the most extreme Israeli claims (babies in ovens, mass systemic rape, etc).
 
Top