Piff Perkins
Veteran
Trump was always going to side with those who pay the most. It explains most of his decision makers. Farmers can't pay up? Oh well more ICE raids. Apple won't pay up? Oh well not stopping that court case. etc. That plus the fawning media praise he expects to get for this...
I'm a liberal and despise much of the left but let's be clear: if Kamala was president RIGHT NOW we'd either already be bombing or planning it for the coming days/weeks/months. Most of the foreign policy people that would have been in her administration are currently cheer leading for this OR making insane arguments ("Israel has a right to defend itself") that would eventually lead to it. I'm not making a broad "all dems would do this" argument, I'm talking about her specifically. You need to be exceptionally dumb to fall for this, and Trump and Kamala fit that bill. Do I think Obama would have attacked Iran? Of course not, we already saw how that played out. Do I think (Bill) Clinton would? No. This is about stupid men, and stupid women who are obsessed with being perceived as being as strong as a man. Hillary would fall for it, no question.
I'm a liberal and despise much of the left but let's be clear: if Kamala was president RIGHT NOW we'd either already be bombing or planning it for the coming days/weeks/months. Most of the foreign policy people that would have been in her administration are currently cheer leading for this OR making insane arguments ("Israel has a right to defend itself") that would eventually lead to it. I'm not making a broad "all dems would do this" argument, I'm talking about her specifically. You need to be exceptionally dumb to fall for this, and Trump and Kamala fit that bill. Do I think Obama would have attacked Iran? Of course not, we already saw how that played out. Do I think (Bill) Clinton would? No. This is about stupid men, and stupid women who are obsessed with being perceived as being as strong as a man. Hillary would fall for it, no question.