Ok 😒 this “everyone in history that was important was secretly black” stuff got to stop we looking crazy “Columbas was a black moor” 😒

[2 Up 2 Down]

Some of it is by non Blacks who want to discredit Black people and Black history. Same as they come on here to derail Black discussions.

One things about Black people, we won't claim anything historic that wasn't Black in origin..that's the difference between Black people and every other race.

Yeah idk about all of that. I've come books and people in real life make crazy claims.

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

Columbus wasn't black but we also can't allow them to diminish us to just being slaves. Black people should never want one of the most disgusting humans to ever exist to be black.

Just goes to show the lack of historical knowledge

 

[tuckgod]

He was a Sephardic Jew that fraternized heavily with Moors, may have been mixed.

The two groups worked in tandem as the merchant class of the world for most of human history until the Jews flipped the script on the Moors at the end of the 1400s and instituted Catholic/White supremacy after the Moors shared their secrets of this hemisphere with them.

 

[Geordi]

Europe was all/mostly Black, and didn't mostly change until 1,700 years ago.

That's what the actual data says.

The changing of Europe from Darkskin type 5-6 Fitzpatrick Skintypes, was gradual and due primarily to multiple invasions from the Eurasian Steppes (Yamnaya, Germanic Etc..)

Anatomically Modern Humans, that migrated out of Africa and populated the World retained their "Tropical" features for thousands of years

---

Britons 'were mostly black 5,000 years ago', new study suggests​

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14454011/Britons-black-study-stonehenge.html

With Stonehenge, just outside the town of Glastonbury, being constructed around 5,000 years ago, experts have said we can assume the builders had dark skin.

Until around 1,700 years ago, the majority of Europeans had dark skin, the authors of the study say, adding that most of the ancient Greeks and Romans, and the Britons who built Stonehenge, had dark skin, eyes and hair.

This is true for the bronze age but we are talking about Europe during recent history. Europe was not black in the middle ages which is where the conspiracies point to.

Race is also different than skin color. Indians can be very dark but they are not racially called black people. Bronze age Europeans would have dark skin but I doubt they racially looked like us. Wouldnt they have looked like white people with dark tans? I dont remember if scientists have data on that

 

[Ty Daniels]

This is true for the bronze age but we are talking about Europe during recent history. Europe was not black in the middle ages which is where the conspiracies point to.

Race is also different than skin color. Indians can be very dark but they are not racially called black people. Bronze age Europeans would have dark skin but I doubt they racially looked like us. Wouldnt they have looked like white people with dark tans? I dont remember if scientists have data on that

"Race" is based on "Phenotype" Appearance.

ALL of the original "Eurasians" had "Tropical" features including Craniofacially.

They "Looked Black".

And had "Black Skintones" but were genetically "Eurasians" like Andamanese, Papua New Guineans etc...

They were "Black Europeans"

 

[tuckgod]

Europe was not black in the middle ages which is where the conspiracies point to.

Damn, so who all these folks?

 

[Mugenight]

Damn, so who all these folks?

Spoiler

I wouldn't waste my time a lot of these negroes love slavery narratives and only slavery narratives.

 

[Diunx]

If we can believe Adam and Eve was the first people on earth then they had to be black..no if and or buts about it..

I mean if you believe that then how can you believe in evolution and the out of Africa theories which are based on scientific evidence and DNA studies?

The Abrahanic religions originated in the Near East so you would assume they saw God and the first man the same color or "race" as themselves.

 

[tuckgod]

I wouldn't waste my time a lot of these negroes love slavery narratives and only slavery narratives.

I’ve already wasted a decade at this point brother, no sense in stopping now

 

[DaddyFresh]

Anybody using "We Wuz" in the same way as insecure white folks, is a CERTIFIED BYTCH!

I googled the meme and sorry but I laughed lmaooooo

 

[3rdWorld]

Yeah idk about all of that. I've come books and people in real life make crazy claims.

Trust me they do..they have realized they can muddy the waters and discredit everything.

 

[Ty Daniels]

To anyone looking to get an understanding of what the ACTUAL Data says, here are some videos, they are LONG, watch them in parts if you have to.

But they cover what the actual scientific/archeological/DNA studies have revealed.

This is not "Picture Spam" "Feel-good-isms" but what the actual facts are, each one of these videos the authors cite their sources.

 

[Creflo ½ Dollar]

markers of culture are passed down from one generation to the next.

so real quick - what hebrew cultural markers (we have the tanakh and talmud for reference) - traditions, rituals, language, and values do we see present among the black diaspora and latinos (according to the hebrew israelite) today?

because i can give you west african cultural markers for each one of these things that survived despite the transatlantic slave trade.

if you and the hebrew israelites can't point to one single hebrew cultural marker, i will kindly ask again to stop with the bullshyt. this is what I meant when i said folks doubling down in ignorance.

Lol Africa big as hell, why would you have cultural markers from a side that’s not even affiliated with each other..how could west African slaves have cultural markers from people way over to east Africa. 2 different groups of black people. I’m not saying all black people are Hebrew Israelites. I’m saying that the OG Israelites was black from Africa…

Beta Israel( Ethiopian Jews) has them same culture markings. All while being isolated from Israel. So yea black people has some of them culture marking,,,west Africans I doubt would have them but there is evidence of them culture markings in black East Africans.

You sounding real c00nish right now

 

[Geordi]

"Race" is based on "Phenotype" Appearance.

ALL of the original "Eurasians" had "Tropical" features including Craniofacially.

They "Looked Black".

And had "Black Skintones" but were genetically "Eurasians" like Andamanese, Papua New Guineans etc...

They were "Black Europeans"

I dont want to confuse people reading this who might get the timelines mixed up; the first "original" Europeans came from Africa 45,000 years ago. By 5000 years ago they would have had white features with dark skin.

2023-08-16-1447 Ötzi - Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

www.eva.mpg.de

Light skin evolved multiple times in Eurasia beginning 30000 years ago.

If you want to go back further and make people mad the first homo species after we lost our fur were probably light skinned then we evolved dark skin in the African sun.

 

[tuckgod]

I mean if you believe that then how can you believe in evolution and the out of Africa theories which are based on scientific evidence and DNA studies?

The Abrahanic religions originated in the Near East so you would assume they saw God and the first man the same color or "race" as themselves.

Out of Africa is based on Europeans mission to prove their superiority by placing themselves at the top of the human evolutionary scale.

These were the same generation and nationality of scientists that came up with all of our current psychological practices, so they knew full well the subconscious effect this would have on their race and the rest of humanity, creating a mental caste system that we all still follow today without giving it any thought.

Ape -> Black -> Brown -> Yellow -> White

It was brilliant.

They have no way of proving that humanity started in Africa, that’s just where they’ve done most of their digging to prove their theory.

For all anyone knows, the earliest human bones are under a mile of ice in Antarctica, under the ocean in the South Pacific, or in a super remote part of the Amazon rain forest.

There’s already alternate theories with early human fossil finds in the Middle East and Asia but they would break the narrative and spell if highly publicized.