Ok 😒 this “everyone in history that was important was secretly black” stuff got to stop we looking crazy “Columbas was a black moor” 😒

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
332,723
Reputation
-34,421
Daps
637,533
Reppin
The Deep State
The Olmec theory came from Andrzej Wiercinski and historian Frederick Peterson, not from Dr. Van Sertima.


“These regions include the Gulf Coast and Oaxaca. The Gulf Coast was initially peopled by the Olmecs (the earliest known major Mesoamerican civilisation) and was later home to the city of El Tajín.”

(Xavier Roca-Rada, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: | 2020 Nov; 11(11): 1346.)

Ancient DNA Studies in Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica - PMC



“The pioneering study of ADNMT carried out on Olmec individuals, one from San Lorenzo and the other from Loma del Zapote, resulted,

in both cases, in the unequivocal presence of the distinctive mutations of the “A” maternal lineage.

That is, the origin of the Olmecs is not in Africa but in America, since they share the most abundant of the five mitochondrial haplogroups characteristic of the indigenous populations of our continent: A, B, C, D and X.”
[…]
Enrique Villamar Becerril. Physical anthropologist from ENAH. Candidate for a doctor in Mesoamerican studies (UNAM), with an analysis of ADNMT in bone remains from various sites of the Preclassic period.”

(Villamar Becerril Enrique, "DNA Studies and the Origin of the Olmecs", Mexican Archeology, no. 150, pp. 40-41.)
I hope you didn’t think I thought olmecs were africans… :hubie: :whoa:
 

Geordi

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2018
Messages
3,002
Reputation
757
Daps
14,448
The Original people who Migrated out of Africa WERE NOT KHOI-SAN Populations, SMH

  • The Khoe-San diverged from the rest of the human lineage ~200,000 to 250,000 years ago, long before the major Out of Africa migration (~60,000–70,000 years ago).

Grasping for Straws, SMH!


:aicmon:
I said thats similar to what they could have looked like since they are the oldest groups we have today. Nobody knows exactly what people 50000 years ago looked like
 

Ty Daniels

Superstar
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
2,195
Reputation
3,856
Daps
15,443
I said thats similar to what they could have looked like since they are the oldest groups we have today. Nobody knows exactly what people 50000 years ago looked like

FALSE:

  • SLC24A5: ancestral form (dark skin)
  • SLC45A2: ancestral form (dark skin)
  • OCA2 / HERC2: ancestral form (dark eyes)
  • MC1R: no mutations for red/blond hair
  • KITLG and TYRP1: ancestral forms

These early AMHs had deeply pigmented skin, dark eyes, and dark hair.

Genetic profiles resemble modern Sub-Saharan Africans — particularly East Africans.

Fossil and Cranial Data


From sites like:
  • Omo Kibish (Ethiopia) – ~195,000 years ago
  • Herto (Ethiopia) – ~160,000 years ago
  • Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) – ~300,000 years ago
  • Skhul & Qafzeh (Levant) – ~100,000 years ago
  • Liujiang (China) – ~68,000–159,000 years ago

Shared Traits:


TraitDescription
Skin toneType V–VI (deep brown to black)
Nasal apertureBroad (tropical adaptation)
Cranial vaultHigh and rounded
Jaw & PrognathismMild to moderate projection
Limb proportionsLong legs and arms (Allen’s Rule)
Hair texture (inferred)Likely tightly coiled/kinky
Eye colorDark brown to black
Body buildLean and tall (Bergmann’s Rule)


These traits are nearly identical to modern Nilotic and East African populations — e.g., Dinka, Hadza, Anuak, Mursi.

Skeletal Reconstructions & CT Scans


Studies and reconstructions of AMH fossils show:
  • High cheekbones
  • Low, wide nasal openings
  • Long limbs relative to torso
  • Strong jawlines

Fossil examples with reconstructions:

  • Omo I & II (Ethiopia)
  • Qafzeh 9 (Israel)
  • Liujiang (Southern China)
  • Tianyuan Man (China, ~40 kya) – retained tropical limb proportions
  • Ust’-Ishim (Siberia, ~45 kya) – dark skin gene variants

Comparative Craniometry

Craniometric comparisons from studies like:
  • Brace et al. (2006)
  • Howells Craniometric Dataset
  • Stringer & McKie (1996)


These show early AMHs clustering closest with:

  • Nilotic groups
  • Horn of Africa populations
  • Melanesians
  • Andamanese
  • Mbuti (Central African Pygmies) in cranial shape


These shared morphologies support tropical origins and Africoid phenotype retention in early global migrants.


What the Original AMHs Looked Like (c. 60,000–70,000 years ago):

CategoryTrait
Skin ColorDark brown to black (Fitzpatrick V–VI)
HairTightly coiled/kinky (Type 4)
EyesDark brown to black
NoseBroad, with low nasal bridge
JawlineProminent, mild prognathism
Cranial VaultHigh, rounded
LimbsLong legs and arms
Body BuildLean, tall
OverallAfricoid/Tropical morphology


:aicmon:

At this point you are just "Arguing to Argue", SMH


ARE YOU, BLACK, YES OR NO?

DO NOT RESPOND BACK TO ME UNTIL YOU ANSWER THIS QUESTION
 
Last edited:

Geordi

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2018
Messages
3,002
Reputation
757
Daps
14,448
FALSE:

  • SLC24A5: ancestral form (dark skin)
  • SLC45A2: ancestral form (dark skin)
  • OCA2 / HERC2: ancestral form (dark eyes)
  • MC1R: no mutations for red/blond hair
  • KITLG and TYRP1: ancestral forms





Fossil and Cranial Data


From sites like:
  • Omo Kibish (Ethiopia) – ~195,000 years ago
  • Herto (Ethiopia) – ~160,000 years ago
  • Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) – ~300,000 years ago
  • Skhul & Qafzeh (Levant) – ~100,000 years ago
  • Liujiang (China) – ~68,000–159,000 years ago

Shared Traits:


TraitDescription
Skin toneType V–VI (deep brown to black)
Nasal apertureBroad (tropical adaptation)
Cranial vaultHigh and rounded
Jaw & PrognathismMild to moderate projection
Limb proportionsLong legs and arms (Allen’s Rule)
Hair texture (inferred)Likely tightly coiled/kinky
Eye colorDark brown to black
Body buildLean and tall (Bergmann’s Rule)


These traits are nearly identical to modern Nilotic and East African populations — e.g., Dinka, Hadza, Anuak, Mursi.

Skeletal Reconstructions & CT Scans


Studies and reconstructions of AMH fossils show:
  • High cheekbones
  • Low, wide nasal openings
  • Long limbs relative to torso
  • Strong jawlines

Fossil examples with reconstructions:

  • Omo I & II (Ethiopia)
  • Qafzeh 9 (Israel)
  • Liujiang (Southern China)
  • Tianyuan Man (China, ~40 kya) – retained tropical limb proportions
  • Ust’-Ishim (Siberia, ~45 kya) – dark skin gene variants

Comparative Craniometry

Craniometric comparisons from studies like:
  • Brace et al. (2006)
  • Howells Craniometric Dataset
  • Stringer & McKie (1996)


These show early AMHs clustering closest with:

  • Nilotic groups
  • Horn of Africa populations
  • Melanesians
  • Andamanese
  • Mbuti (Central African Pygmies) in cranial shape





What the Original AMHs Looked Like (c. 60,000–70,000 years ago):

CategoryTrait
Skin ColorDark brown to black (Fitzpatrick V–VI)
HairTightly coiled/kinky (Type 4)
EyesDark brown to black
NoseBroad, with low nasal bridge
JawlineProminent, mild prognathism
Cranial VaultHigh, rounded
LimbsLong legs and arms
Body BuildLean, tall
OverallAfricoid/Tropical morphology


:aicmon:

At this point you are just "Arguing to Argue", SMH


ARE YOU, BLACK, YES OR NO?

DO NOT RESPOND BACK TO ME UNTIL YOU ANSWER THIS QUESTION
Yes I'm black

There are too many topics now; we are not talking about the first anatomically modern humans. Weren't the San people around 60000 years ago?

Are you saying Europeans in Britain looked like the Dinka only 1,700 years ago?

MG_4344.jpg
 

Ty Daniels

Superstar
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
2,195
Reputation
3,856
Daps
15,443
Yes I'm black

There are too many topics now; we are not talking about the first anatomically modern humans. Weren't the San people around 60000 years ago?

Are you saying Europeans in Britain looked like the Dinka only 1,700 years ago?

MG_4344.jpg

"I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING", SMH

:stopitslime:

The Data I presented is NOT FROM ME, BUT FROM MULTIPLE SCIENTIFIC STUDIES!

Ancient (Early Out Of Africa)Europeans/Eurasians looked Closer (Phenotypically) to the Dinka than Modern Europeans.

That is WHAT THE DATA Says.

:aicmon:


You keep trying to Navigate around your own "Personal Opinions", while I AM NOT.
I am relying on the CURRENT AVAILABLE DATA

Also the Khoe-San People SPLIT FROM THE "OUT OF AFRICA" Population, BEFORE THEY EVEN LEFT AFRICA.

The Khoe-San People WERE NOT THE "OUT OF AFRICA" Population, SMH!


Genetic studies show that Khoe-San populations diverged from all other humans ~200,000–250,000 years ago, possibly even earlier.
 
Last edited:

Geordi

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2018
Messages
3,002
Reputation
757
Daps
14,448
"I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING", SMH

:stopitslime:

The Data I presented is NOT FROM ME, BUT FROM MULTIPLE SCIENTIFIC STUDIES!

Ancient (Early Out Of Africa)Europeans/Eurasians looked Closer (Phenotypically) to the Dinka than Modern Europeans.

That is WHAT THE DATA Says.

:aicmon:


You keep trying to Navigate around your own "Personal Opinions", while I AM NOT.
I am relying on the CURRENT AVAILABLE DATA

Also the Khoe-San People SPLIT FROM THE "OUT OF AFRICA" Population, BEFORE THEY EVEN LEFT AFRICA.

The Khoe-San People WE NOT THE "OUT OF AFRICA" Population, SMH!


Genetic studies show that Khoe-San populations diverged from all other humans ~200,000–250,000 years ago, possibly even earlier.
You are all over the place. This topic is about Columbus and my original comment was about Europe in Columbus time. Then you replied to me about Europeans 1700 years ago. Now you talking about out of Africa.

All I want to know is what the people in Britain looked like in the year 1500 bc. Do you have any facial reconstructions?
 

Ty Daniels

Superstar
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
2,195
Reputation
3,856
Daps
15,443
You are all over the place. This topic is about Columbus and my original comment was about Europe in Columbus time. Then you replied to me about Europeans 1700 years ago. Now you talking about out of Africa.

All I want to know is what the people in Britain looked like in the year 1500 bc. Do you have any facial reconstructions?

I am "NOT ALL OVER THE PLACE", YOU ARE.

You made a statement earlier about:

"Black Europe and White Cave Men with Cubs, Taking it over" as a Jab about people claiming that Europeans were ever "Black",
I responded, NOW WE ARE HERE.

You Brought up "Khoe San" Not me.

:comeon:



I do not rely on "Facial Reconstructions" because they are ALL Subject to "Artistic License" which basically means that the artist does what the Fukk they want with it, at any point in the process.

They also rely on "Soft Tissue" data that is often gathered from populations that DON'T Match(and or are not even similar to) the actual Reconstruction Target.

I posted CRANIO-FACIAL AND SKELETAL INFO and names of multiple Studies.

This will be my last post to you, I have ZERO desire to go back in forth with someone who is "UNPREPARED", SMH!

:aicmon:
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
15,883
Reputation
2,982
Daps
43,795
Reppin
Duval Florida
What it’s saying is that the evolution of man goes ape to Black man ultimately reaching its full evolutionary potential as the White man.

It’s the whole basis for white supremacy/manifest destiny, and retarded muthafukkas like you serve to prove them right every time you decide to share your thoughts.

Just shows you and others don't understand science of evolution. Evolution doesn't have a damn ultimate!

When I was dumb...I thought as you do...that evolution was saying Europeans were the "update" to black people. Get scientifically literate bruh. Because black people dead last due to us being scientifically illiterate.
 
Top