We aren't a treadmill team tho. We been a #1 seed and won 60 games. We been to the 2nd round two years in a row and been to the playoffs 9 years in a row.they have a better long term future than what they had with Bynum/Holiday/and Thad Young....The 76ers have enough assets to do whatever it is they want to do. And thats on top of the 1st pick in this draft. Being a treadmill team like the Hawks means nothing. As a franchise going forward they are currently far more attractive than they were.
It could work. The pieces they needed most, they got. Two potentially elite players in Simmons and Embiid. The rest on them and their management. They gonna have to build around Simmons game. Embiid fits with anybody who's a PF. Put the rest is on management.Rebuilding (partially or full) isn't pointless. The "process" the 76ers took to rebuild was basically a waste of time though. The only two pieces going forward they have is a 7fter they drafted two years ago who hasn't seen the court and whose health status is unknown and a 22yo Euro product whose value in the league is unknown. That is not a stable foundation going forward after you've been tanking for the last three seasons.
![]()
Raptors and Hawks went to the ECF, bytch, Philly hasn't been since A.I. Some of you fans as stupid as fukk. Being a very good team is good in the NBA. Hell, some of them like Dallas and Detroit have won titles being very good. No shame in that. Right now, Philly is down right awful. With their current pieces, they likely to win 20 games year and that's with Simmons. Don't even know why you talking down on some nikkas that's superior to youI got mixed feelings about this...
before the tanking the sixers had absolutely no legit pieces in there, Iggy left them, and jrue holiday was average. They needed high picks badly because no serious free agent was going to play there, basically sixers had no chance of landing a top free agent. The high draft picks give you realistic chance of building some, the biggest issue out of all this is that they gave these young players a loser culture, which might be a big issue later on.
So its kind of the idea was legit
Most of these eastern teams including hawks or raptors have a low ceiling. A lot of team owners build average to good teams that fill up the seats in the arena, take them to like 2nd round and thats how far they go, they dont risk at tanking nor paying huge salary in hopes of building a championship team. They basically settle for less without the big risk. And they have no realistic chances of winning championship.
Sixers however got unlucky with Embiid, yet he was still worth taking the risk, look at players drafted outside of top 3, most of them are going to have role player careers. Randle looks one dimensional, he may have a decent career, Smart is basically tony allen unless he learns how to shoot, Gordon is too raw right now, stauskas is soon to be jimmer v2, who else was drafted, exum? Horrible injury and way too raw player.
MCW draft was a mistake, he is too slow for pg position and he cant shoot, he is useless and he would never be a starting player for a contender. Also sixers tanking timing was bad because for the 3 straight years some of the best talents were tall players in that C/PF position. Sixers were simply drafting the best available talent.
I understand Noel didn't really pan out, probably cause of that injury in Kentucky but Okafor had a solid 17/7 rookie year. Why they wanna get rid of him?
He has a ton of talent but he's got his work cut out for him now though, there's a new Warden of the North, first of his name, protector of Minnesota and Lord of Minneapolis.....Karl Anthony Towns.
I think it will take more than the 3rd to get Okafor though. Okafor will likely be better than whoever goes 3rd in this draft (probably Hield)Possibly, the Sixers & Celtics discussed a trade at the deadline that involved Okafor.
The C's badly wanted one of the top two picks, they could draft Hield and keep him, but the best bet for them to get an offensive threat would be Okafor who is better right now than any big in the draft.
Any team that isn't a threat to get out of the conference is a treadmill team.Just so we clear. A treadmill team is a team like Milwaukee with Michael Redd or Washington with Arenas where 1st round is as good as it gets. Hell, Atlanta in the late 90s and mid 2000s. But if you making it to the 2nd and conference finals like Memphis and Atlanta, you aren't a treadmill team. You just aren't elite.
because hawks and raptors have no chance of winnning a title because they have no superstar and superstars are winning you titles. Sixers are doing all or nothing move by tanking in hopes to draft a superstar, what you dont understand? They had bad luck with embiid gamble and for the last few years majority of best talents were big men. And since they were drafting best available talent their pieces are not meshing together that well. AI leading them to the last conference finals is EXACTLY why they are tanking because no legit free agent was joining them when they had Iguodala, Williams, Jrue Holiday and other non all star players.Raptors and Hawks went to the ECF, bytch, Philly hasn't been since A.I. Some of you fans as stupid as fukk. Being a very good team is good in the NBA. Hell, some of them like Dallas and Detroit have won titles being very good. No shame in that. Right now, Philly is down right awful. With their current pieces, they likely to win 20 games year and that's with Simmons. Don't even know why you talking down on some nikkas that's superior to you
They are not trading both. They know they have to get rid of one, so they're gauging interest for both to see which one can net the biggest haul. And everyone keeps saying we're trading players away. Who have we traded in three years outside of MCW!?!? Y'all nikkas just see it the way y'all want to see it. Hinkie acquired a ton of assets for this reason. To wheel & deal! To keep and/or move parts to round out the roster... Why everyone thinks we should've been happy to be a treadmill squad is beyond me!?!?Noel and Okafor aren't a part of their future it seems now and even if they can they get equal value in return doesn't necessarily mean it was the right option to take in the first place. It didn't make any sense whatsoever to even take Embiid, Noel and Okafor in succession like that (i's counterproductive of trying to move forward and you lessen your chances of finding a balance drafting three players who basically play the same position), even on some BPA or insurance shyt. Now there's the realistic possibility that all those three players will be basically be turned into drafting/trading for future talent (hence the re-run) or in Embiid's case turn into dust.
There's a point where you need to start building something though. You can't just keep turning over talent and picks until you think you've struck gold; the odds of that player having the talent, position ruling, style, temperament, health, fit with a franchise and have all the proper movements going forward in your favor (coaching, luck, personnel and competition) isn't worth it.
The longer this goes on the longer the smell will stay around too.