Older thread '20 NYK Off-season Thread

[Ty-Fife]

I like how that missed goaltend really came back to hurt us

 

[JMurder]

The front office signed Randle to be an All-Star this season remember

Randle is a "bully", a "dog", and a "hardworker" he'll get it together breh it's only been 16 games right?

I don't think this is on Fiz. Fiz in Memphis wasn't afraid to shake things up. He's the one who moved Zach Randolph to the bench and forced Marc Gasol to take more three pointers. Could very well be Perry and Mills shot calling.

Fiz can play Randle minutes and not start him. I think if he can find a decent starting lineup that doesn't include Julius it will pay dividends. The insistence on starting him when the rewards aren't being produced can't be blamed on the front office.

I dare @ikbm and @JMurder to claim Frank wasn’t guarding Dinwiddie

dinwiddie scored twice on frank. the majority of his damage was at the freethrow line and switches
Go boxscore watch somewhere else dikkhead

 

[seemorecizzy]

Fiz can play Randle minutes and not start him. I think if he can find a decent starting lineup that doesn't include Julius it will pay dividends. The insistence on starting him when the rewards aren't being produced can't be blamed on the front office.

randle has played and started on better teams
if we are attempting to further develop him, why would we bring him off the bench on a worst team. u need to look at shyt objectively and get over your personal like and dislike for players

 

[tremonthustler1]

Why are these reporters at these press conferences being so timid and asking such softball questions? Does Dolan have them shook?

Meanwhile Adam Gase was getting destroyed by the media earlier in the season.

Access.

 

[Deep_Black_Conscious]

fiz started 4 pf's tonight

 

[ISO]

randle has played and started on better teams
if we are attempting to further develop him, why would we bring him off the bench on a worst team. u need to look at shyt objectively and get over your personal like and dislike for players

Randle hasn't started for any good teams.

These are his best teams a 35 win Lakers team and a 33 win Pelicans team. On both those teams he started 49 games meaning those teams also had him coming off the bench for a good portion of the season.

Randle has duped teams since coming out of Kentucky. I remember people used to call him the "next C-Webb". He shouldn't be starting for the good of this team and no team should view him as a centerpiece type of player but he has a reputation and been given the "potential" label. Last season he was able to bully ball his way to numbers by feasting against second units on an uptempo New Orleans teams where he got a lot of easy scoring opportunities. His numbers often came to the detriment of the team because he plays such a low I.Q. brand of ball.

Randle is currently averaging 3.6 turnovers, 3.3 fouls, 43% FG, 25% 3PT, 62% FT, with inconsistent defensive effort, and in the clutch is often when he's had his biggest lapses. He's not a good fit here and he has too much usage. I want to see him come off the bench with Elfrid.

This team would be better if Mook was at the 4, Barrett at the 3, and Weezy at the 2.

 

[JMurder]

randle has played and started on better teams
if we are attempting to further develop him, why would we bring him off the bench on a worst team. u need to look at shyt objectively and get over your personal like and dislike for players

Do you think we are attempting to further develop him?

Has he started on winning teams?

If your best argument is that Julius Randle started before so he should start now then maybe we should stop discussing basketball

 

[JMurder]

Randle hasn't started for any good teams.

These are his best teams a 35 win Lakers team and a 33 win Pelicans team. On both those teams he started 49 games meaning those teams also had him coming off the bench for a good portion of the season.

Randle has duped teams since coming out of Kentucky. I remember people used to call him the "next C-Webb". He shouldn't be starting for the good of this team and no team should view him as a centerpiece type of player but he has a reputation and been given the "potential" label. Last season he was able to bully ball his way to numbers by feasting against second units on an uptempo New Orleans teams where he got a lot of easy scoring opportunities. His numbers often came to the detriment of the team because he plays such a low I.Q. brand of ball.

Randle is currently averaging 3.6 turnovers, 3.3 fouls, 43% FG, 25% 3PT, 62% FT, with inconsistent defensive effort, and in the clutch is often when he's had his biggest lapses. He's not a good fit here and he has too much usage. I want to see him come off the bench with Elfrid.

This team would be better if Mook was at the 4, Barrett at the 3, and Weezy at the 2.

 

[ISO]

Sadly there is a good PF inside of Julius Randle.

But he won't stop driving into traffic thinking he can outmuscle everyone, he won't stop posting up when he has no arsenal of moves, he'll continue to look players off in passing opportunities, he continues to look for highlight plays, he'll continue to take poor contested step back jumpers, he won't let the game come to him and will force action, he won't realize when he doesn't have a mismatch, he'll continue to cheat off ball defensively, he'll continue to cheese inside for offensive board opportunities.

When Julius tightens up his handle, works on adding some type of skillset in the face up and post up, polishes his jumper, stops playing for highlights and stats, plays in the flow of the game. That's the day he'll become the player people think he can become.

 

[NY's #1 Draft Pick]

Glad I ain’t watch the game today. So stress free brehs. Y’all got to try it sometime.

On to Cacstop notice he didn’t appear not one time last night when randle was shytting the bed. His M.O is too watch box scores throughout the nba and go into team threads to troll. Wish we can block that fekkit from coming in here.

 

[Deep_Black_Conscious]

If you're the Knicks, do you resign Morris as your starting PF (short 1-2 year deal) if you can successfully trade Randle?

 

[JMurder]

If you're the Knicks, do you resign Morris as your starting PF (short 1-2 year deal) if you can successfully trade Randle?

I don't know if that's a question that should be asked or answered right now. I really like Mook. He's a valuable piece in a rotation and I can envision a successful Knicks team with him and Mitch as our starting bigs. But I also think that he would be a more valuable piece coming off of the bench on a really good team, and he might be a piece that would help us actually obtain the starting PF we need to become that good team.

Long story less long...let's ask this question if he's still with us at the end of the season

 

[RickyGQ]

Being a Knicks fan is like being in a domestic relationship.

and why are we even still here? bytch don’t cook, don’t clean... she not even that cute....




but i love her tho...

 

[seemorecizzy]

Randle hasn't started for any good teams.

These are his best teams a 35 win Lakers team and a 33 win Pelicans team. On both those teams he started 49 games meaning those teams also had him coming off the bench for a good portion of the season.

Randle has duped teams since coming out of Kentucky. I remember people used to call him the "next C-Webb". He shouldn't be starting for the good of this team and no team should view him as a centerpiece type of player but he has a reputation and been given the "potential" label. Last season he was able to bully ball his way to numbers by feasting against second units on an uptempo New Orleans teams where he got a lot of easy scoring opportunities. His numbers often came to the detriment of the team because he plays such a low I.Q. brand of ball.

Randle is currently averaging 3.6 turnovers, 3.3 fouls, 43% FG, 25% 3PT, 62% FT, with inconsistent defensive effort, and in the clutch is often when he's had his biggest lapses. He's not a good fit here and he has too much usage. I want to see him come off the bench with Elfrid.

This team would be better if Mook was at the 4, Barrett at the 3, and Weezy at the 2.

im not a randle fan
but he was brought here to be developed by our clown front office
you cant simply quit on his development after 15 games

 

[seemorecizzy]

Do you think we are attempting to further develop him[/B]?

Has he started on winning teams?

If your best argument is that Julius Randle started before so he should start now then maybe we should stop discussing basketball

why was julius randle brought to the knicks as a 24 year player coming off a 21 and 8 season? what was the original idea behind signing him and giving him a extra year on his contract?