something that we brought nuance toI'm not concerned about diaspora wars. I'm talking about the concept of blackness in a global sense
without ADOS the idea of "black" would just apply to those who are dark. so if thats what you meant then fine. But thats not how its defined here.
the black american experience does not apply to them, africans and caribbeans they go through the immigrant minority experience if anything. Africans and caribbeans have more in common with other immigrants that are minorities like Mexicans than us.An African or carribean person gets his or her introduction to blackness when they come to a country where they are not the majority. Racism is intricately linked to the black experience.
and there are slurs used by africans against usThere is a reason why on a list of racial slurs black people have the most derogatory terms to describe us. Anti blackness is global. Africans understand what white people think of them because there are people alive who remember colonial governments. Black people in the US know what white people think of them because we experience it when we are out here. You know you're black the way non black and black people treat you.

@bolded: doesnt make sense as Africans treat each other like shyt, so do Caribbeans do to each other
all wrong if your talking about american "blackness" as created by us. its defined and about ADOS people and its what we go by hence people who are not dark, mixed and so on are "black" here in America.Blackness is largely dependent on skin tone and overall lineage. Who is considered black has become so diluted that we are in a situation where people like Rachel Dolezal can infiltrate and pretend to represent us because we've decided to make it a big tent thing.
Are you even ADOS?
