A lot of people were completely dismissing him as a non factor across the board. Just setting the record straight. Red had his time.yea i was about to mention the 1st album, but youre focusing on just the east coast and 1 album.

A lot of people were completely dismissing him as a non factor across the board. Just setting the record straight. Red had his time.yea i was about to mention the 1st album, but youre focusing on just the east coast and 1 album.

Nah Dmx is the only rapper to have his first 3 albums debut #1 on the billboard top 200 breh,do ya research
And still their record sales don't compare to DMX's
But our course. My point is nikkas with slight success only get credit when they're from the eastShort was running the Bay during that time.
Red was running the East in 92-93.But our course. My point is nikkas with slight success only get credit when they're from the east
Ok,stop comparing him to nikkas that was running the country or a huge factor in it.red wasn't a big deal. And his so called classics are just alrightRed was running the East in 92-93.
Moron revisionist history
Took you 6 pages to admit thatOk,stop comparing him to nikkas that was running the country or a huge factor in it.red wasn't a big deal. And his so called classics are just alright

I didnt say i agreed just saying i could care less cause he still should be the one to goTook you 6 pages to admit that![]()
A lot of people were completely dismissing him as a non factor across the board. Just setting the record straight. Red had his time.![]()
Red was running the East in 92-93.
What 10 east coast artist were bigger than Redman, during Redman's 3 album run?
Keep in mind, Redman albums saw the Gangsta rap era (1992), the Nas/B.I.G. bring New York Back era (1994), and he saw the Shiny Suit era (Pac and B.I.G. r.i.p.) (1996). And Redman albums also saw the Down South/Roc era (2001).
If I said spice 1 was running shyt based off dropping gold albums in 92' 93'94' and 95' nikkas would laugh. These east coast bias b*stards
Short was running the Bay during that time.
being a top 10 artist on a particular coast doesnt equate to being in the forefront.
like i said, its easier to have longevity(back when it mattered) when the microscope isnt on you like that.
redman was a force with those first 3 albums, but lets be reality, he wasnt even the top dog in his state.

Group vs soloistnaughty & then onyx were the beasts of the east.
and naughty from the same state as redman.


Let me get this straight,
1) He was a force
2) He wasn't the top dog in New Jersey during the 90's
3) Top 10 means nothing
4) His longevity doesn't matter for some reason you made up
My only guess is you just having fun out here...like that guy who sits on milk crates in front of the corner store arguing why Pontiacs are better than Toyotas.
Group vs soloist
Nobody in Onyx stood out like that.
So the question is Treach vs. Red.
I'd argue Red over Treach. Obviously Naughty sold more records.

you dont have it straight
1.) he was a force, but he was never at the forefront of the game.
2.) are you insinuating that redman had a bigger wave than naughty?
3.) BE SMART SON
4.) this wasnt directed towards redman. it was aimed at tip & wayne. i was saying that longevity doesnt mean anything NOWADAYS because theres nothing organic about mainstream rap anymore.