Only single chicks wouldn't take back a cheater

Giselle

**********
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
11,296
Reputation
2,097
Daps
20,428
:dahell::deadmanny:

You are so jaded and have such a negative outlook on relationships when you've never even been in one WTF?! :wtf::mindblown:
Actually, once again, you are wrong.

I have a very postive outlook on healthy romantic relationships and a strong disdain for cheaters.

Adult relationship? No. Most teen/early 20 year olds haven't, especially with all of this casual "situation" stuff being popular.I'm pretty sure you've never been in an adult relationship, one outside of highschool and college.

You don't know me and you never will. Idk how many times I am going to have to tell you that.
 

Shadow King

Quiet N***a Loud Choppa
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
44,180
Reputation
3,827
Daps
88,729
Reppin
Hometown of Cherokee at Law
A mistake and a poor decision is not the same thing. A mistake is not made on purpose. A poor decision is a decision you know is wrong, but don't care and decide to do it anyway.

Selecting the wrong answer on a test is a mistake; not studying for that test is a bad decision. The mistake was something you did without intention; the bad decision was made intentionally, without regard for the consequence.

Google the definitions b/c you seem to be confused.
mis·take
\mə-ˈstāk\
  • : to understand (something orsomeone) incorrectly
  • : to make a wrong judgment about(something)
  • : to identify (someone orsomething) incorrectly
Full Definition

  • transitive verb
  • 1 : to blunder in the choice of <mistook her way in the dark>
  • 2 a : to misunderstand the meaningor intention of : misinterpret <don'tmistake me, I mean exactly what Isaid>
    b : to make a wrong judgment of thecharacter or ability of
  • 3 : to identify wrongly : confuse withanother <I mistook him for hisbrother
You can't make judgment on something and it's not on purpose
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,486
Reputation
2,550
Daps
103,634
Actually, once again, you are wrong.

I have a very postive outlook on healthy romantic relationships and a strong disdain for cheaters.

Adult relationship? No. Most teen/early 20 year olds haven't, especially with all of this casual "situation" stuff being popular.I'm pretty sure you've never been in an adult relationship, one outside of highschool and college.

You don't know me and you never will. Idk how many times I am going to have to tell you that.
You can say you don't but your posts scream otherwise. Like I said in another comment, you subconsciously feel that your marriage may or will end, so you justify taking his money when if you're married it should be both your money but that's another story for another time. Anyways, you justify a wife taking her husband's money and stashing it in case the marriage doesn't work out.

If you can't see how that isn't jaded when it comes to relationships, then you are delusional. And what do you mean by Adult relationship? What does that even mean? Even if someone is in college or high school, their relationship experience is very much still an experience. It shapes who they are whether good or bad, it affects them whether good or bad.

Stop trying to act like you know all these things when you clearly don't. You don't even have the life experiences to speak on so much subjects.. that's why you stay making threads asking male coli posters how they feel about certain things when it comes to dealing with women or relationships.

"Punishing" your husband because he could potentially cheat on you is ridiculous. Just because you have a strong disdain for cheaters, it doesn't mean the man you choose to marry should have to suffer and not trust his wife because she has trust issues. And there are plenty of 20 year olds who are in committed relationships that aren't "casual". Who even said anything about casual dating?

And I don't care if I will never know you. What was the point of putting that in there in the first place? To get me mad or something? Well, it didn't work.
 

xXOGLEGENDXx

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
9,036
Reputation
7,118
Daps
64,079
No you have not.
You have no logic.

They're business partners, they aren't in a relationship anymore. Plust both are terrible people. Everyone is not hillary and bill.
That's not a good man to her, he is a good business partner for her, not a good person to be in a healthy monog relationship with. He is not a good man, neither of them are good people.

Clinton has power and they have an ok public image. She had much more financial support for her campaign b/c of him. Much more than Bernie, which is another reason why Bernie didn't win.

Business partners.


Smart women with self esteem leave, take their half and the stuff the money of his that they stashed.

Weak women stay b/c they are financially dependent and/or they are desperate with low self esteem or maybe they think it will be bad for their children.

Trump is possibly on his way to becoming president as well, and he is not smart at all. There have been lots of presidents who aren't so bright. Hillary has been caught lying too many times. The general puclic or the people who voted for her aren't so bright either.
It is PLUS not Plust. And
take their half and the stuff the money of his that they stashed.
doesn't make any legible sense. Mhmm not fun having grammar police around is it?

You keep proving my point by pointing out logical reasons for Hillary to stay, which was my whole original argument in the first place. Who they are and their personalities are not the issue. You are in no position to call them terrible people because you don't know them personally. All that matters is Hillary had a husband that cheated and it made logical sense for her to stay with him because she knew she would gain much more. Whether she is desperate with low self esteem or not, we don't know that either, she did the logical thing to satisfy what she wanted. That is the main point I am making here.
 

The Wolf Among You

Superstar
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
7,335
Reputation
2,277
Daps
33,941
Use to work with a chick who loved her boyfriend to death. They eventually had a baby and got married. She was so nice and patient. Literally the best manager the company had.

Anyway she was fukking one of our coworkers who look 10x better than her man. No one knew it happend. Her man never found out. The only reason I knew is because the co worker told me.

You won't find too many examples b/c women like that are great at keeping it on the low.

:mjcry:

Someone's thirst for power does not go away just because they graduated. His cheating is proof he was still the same person.

His wife stayed b/c she is weak. She was convinced by him that it was important for the success of the civil rights movement for them to stay married. Divorce was frowned upon heavily back then. She also did NOT have her own money. Good men/men worth being in a relationship with do not purposely cause their wives stress, they do not cause them to cry, the do not repeatedly disrespect them. This is NOT the 50s 60s. Women can and should leave a disrespectful cheating male. It is the smartest thing to do.



No cheating male is a good man. Did they have good jobs, yes they did.


What do you mean by this?
 

HE_Pennypacker

Superstar
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
2,862
Reputation
570
Daps
13,424
Reppin
Australia
I personally think women cheat about as much as men do, they're just more adamant in their lies and do a much better job of hiding shyt. You only need to look at how many dudes are out there raising kids they think are theirs.

If you cheat on your partner, you're a rubbish partner/husband/wife and you can't think much of them. MLK was a great civil rights leader, but he clearly had little respect for his wife or his marriage. Same with Ali.

Anyway, only a loser would stay with a partner who cheats on them. If you find out your partner has cheated on you and you stay with them, that's lifetime L of grand proportions.
 

Giselle

**********
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
11,296
Reputation
2,097
Daps
20,428
You can say you don't but your posts scream otherwise. Like I said in another comment, you subconsciously feel that your marriage may or will end, so you justify taking his money when if you're married it should be both your money but that's another story for another time. Anyways, you justify a wife taking her husband's money and stashing it in case the marriage doesn't work out.

If you can't see how that isn't jaded when it comes to relationships, then you are delusional. And what do you mean by Adult relationship? What does that even mean? Even if someone is in college or high school, their relationship experience is very much still an experience. It shapes who they are whether good or bad, it affects them whether good or bad.

Stop trying to act like you know all these things when you clearly don't. You don't even have the life experiences to speak on so much subjects.. that's why you stay making threads asking male coli posters how they feel about certain things when it comes to dealing with women or relationships.

"Punishing" your husband because he could potentially cheat on you is ridiculous. Just because you have a strong disdain for cheaters, it doesn't mean the man you choose to marry should have to suffer and not trust his wife because she has trust issues. And there are plenty of 20 year olds who are in committed relationships that aren't "casual". Who even said anything about casual dating?

And I don't care if I will never know you. What was the point of putting that in there in the first place? To get me mad or something? Well, it didn't work.
Again, I have a postive view on healthy romantic relationships. I am always and will always be harsh on cheaters. That doesn't mean that I have a negative view of relationships, that means I have a negative view of cheaters, which everyone should have.

Married people should put some of their money together for their joint expenses and have their own to buy whatever they want so there is no telling the other person what they can/can't buy like they're someone's parent. That makes more sense and that is what me and my husband will be doing. Stashed money can be used for anything. If someone loses their job, it can be used to support the family, if he cheats, it's useful to have to take with you when you leave. I have said similar things plenty of times on here before. You would know if you read all of my posts, which you haven't or if you knew me, which you don't, but wish you did which is why you're so worried about me. :queen:

Little kiddie teenaged relationships aren't real. Going by what you said, you may as well include jr high and all of the little crushes and "relationships" people have throught their school years. You don't even know if I've had any of those or not b/c you don't know me. That's probably all you've had since you're trying so hard to defend it. They aren't real/ adult relationship.

I doubt you have any more life experience (outside of sex) than I do being that you are in your early 20s as well, probably still in school and still living with your parents. I make threads to get the unfiltered/honest male opinion, to compare things that are said on here vs things irl,to compare male/female opinions on here vs lsa, and to troll sometimes b/c I don't take this site too seriously. You shouldn't be so worried about my threads/posts. I'm pretty sure you have stupid and/or immature threads on here. Worry about yourself and your own posts.

& You are clearly bothered. lol

This is exactly why I thought you were gay b/c you act super bytchy or super annoying. There is never an in between, nothing that says grown hetero man anywhere in your posts. You're like a pesky teenaged boy. I bet you will continue to go back and forth like the messy little princess you are while most of the other males on here would ignore it and move on.


Good night now :smile:
 

Giselle

**********
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
11,296
Reputation
2,097
Daps
20,428
It is PLUS not Plust. And

doesn't make any legible sense. Mhmm not fun having grammar police around is it?

You keep proving my point by pointing out logical reasons for Hillary to stay, which was my whole original argument in the first place. Who they are and their personalities are not the issue. You are in no position to call them terrible people because you don't know them personally. All that matters is Hillary had a husband that cheated and it made logical sense for her to stay with him because she knew she would gain much more. Whether she is desperate with low self esteem or not, we don't know that either, she did the logical thing to satisfy what she wanted. That is the main point I am making here.

LOL adding an extra letter b/c of a typo isn't the same as using the wrong word b/c you are too stupid to not know the difference between "then" which deals with time/order and "than" wich deals with comparisons. :queen:

& You keep proving my point. Staying with a cheating man or person for money doesn't prove that the cheater is a good man or person (which is what you've been saying). Having money and social connections does not make someone a good man or person. Good people do not cheat. What don't you understand about that?
 

xXOGLEGENDXx

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
9,036
Reputation
7,118
Daps
64,079
LOL adding an extra letter b/c of a typo isn't the same as using the wrong word b/c you are too stupid to not know the difference between "then" which deals with time/order and "than" wich deals with comparisons. :queen:

& You keep proving my point. Staying with a cheating man or person for money doesn't prove that the cheater is a good man or person (which is what you've been saying). Having money and social connections does not make someone a good man or person. Good people do not cheat. What don't you understand about that?
Explain this..
take their half and the stuff the money of his that they stashed.
 

Giselle

**********
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
11,296
Reputation
2,097
Daps
20,428
Explain this..
LOL

I had more there, but deleted it, but I forgot to delete "the stuff".

It is a typo. That is not the same as using the wrong word like you did because you didn't know any better. That also has nothing to do with this nonsense you are trying to pass off as logic in this thread. You're opinion is wrong and stupid.
 

xXOGLEGENDXx

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
9,036
Reputation
7,118
Daps
64,079
LOL

I had more there, but deleted it, but I forgot to delete "the stuff".

It is a typo. That is not the same as using the wrong word like you did because you didn't know any better. That also has nothing to do with this nonsense you are trying to pass off as logic in this thread. You're opinion is wrong and stupid.
still wouldn't make sense.

You can't explain why women benefit more from staying with men other than..."They are weak."
You keep saying it's not all about the money, yet your whole argument is based off of women having money.
You keep assuming that I think a good man is only based upon having money.
You think becoming the president doesn't mean you are smart.
You said women should have their own money, yet insist they stash away some of their man's money.
You think the only reason women stay is because of money and not the other reasons I mentioned.

Look at all those Ls. I could go on for days. I'm guessing your reply to those facts will be something along the lines of character assassination?
 
Top